Skip to content
Likelier
Peer-reviewed Canadian Journal of Clinical Pharmacology — Goh, Verjee & Koren (Motherisk, Hospital for Sick Children), 2010

Alcohol content in declared non- or low alcoholic beverages: implications to pregnancy

Cited in 2 Likelier entries (2 risks, 0 decisions).

Used in 2 entries

For each citing entry, the verbatim excerpt and Likelier's calculation notes (how the source's number was converted to the lifetime-probability framing) are shown below. Click through to read the full claim ledger.

  1. Statistic
    Of 45 beverages labeled non- or low-alcohol tested by gas chromatography, 13 (29%) contained ethanol above the concentration declared on the label; 6 products claiming to contain no alcohol were found to contain more than 1% ethanol
    “"Pregnant women seeking replacement to alcoholic beverages may be misled by these labels, unknowingly exposing themselves and their unborn babies to ethanol."”
    Calculation notes
    The load-bearing number for this entry: 13 of 45 (29%) declared non-/low-alcohol beverages measured higher ethanol than their label stated, and 6 of the 45 that claimed to contain no alcohol exceeded 1% ethanol — double the 0.5% legal ceiling for the non-alcoholic class. This is a per-product label-accuracy failure rate, not a lifetime harm probability, which is one reason the entry carries no normalized figure. Used to support the claim that the concrete hazard is label unreliability rather than the labeled dose. Canadian market, 2010; brand mix and QC have likely shifted since, so the exact 29% should be read as order-of-magnitude, not current.
    

    Source date: 2010-01-01 · Accessed: 2026-08-01

  2. Statistic
    Of 45 beverages labeled non- or low-alcohol, 6 that claimed to contain no alcohol were found to contain greater than 1% ethanol; 13 of 45 (29%) exceeded their declared alcohol content
    “"Six beverages claiming to contain no alcohol were found to contain greater than 1% ethanol."”
    Calculation notes
    The more recent corroboration, and the sharper one: six products that claimed to contain no alcohol tested above 1% ABV. At 1% v/v a 12 fl oz serving is 355 × 0.01 × 0.789 = 2.8 g ethanol ≈ 1/5 of a standard drink — so a "no alcohol" label spanned, in testing, from genuinely negligible to a fifth of a real drink. Establishes that the zero-claim label class is the one testing catches above zero, which is the entry's core point. Canadian market, 2010; read as order-of-magnitude, not a current rate. See also the sibling entry [[non-alcoholic-beer-pregnancy]] for the under-0.5% "non-alcoholic" class.
    

    Source date: 2010-01-01 · Accessed: 2026-08-01

Also cited in these entries

HealthDirect

NA beer while pregnant

What are the odds that a non-alcoholic beer (under 0.5%, not zero) harms a baby during pregnancy or breastfeeding?

HealthDirect

0.0% beer while pregnant

Is a "0.0%" (alcohol-free) beer truly zero alcohol, and safe during pregnancy or breastfeeding?

Recently viewed on this device