Zum Inhalt springen
Likelier

Reue durch Handeln vs. Nichthandeln

IVF anstreben, um ein biologisches Kind zu bekommen, vs. adoptieren

Wenn du handelst

Künstliche Befruchtung verfolgen

19%

Wenn du nicht handelst

Ein Kind adoptieren

5,0%

Anteil derer, die jede Entscheidung später bereuen. Balken und vollständige Datengrundlage erscheinen unten.


Familie

Zuletzt überprüft 2026-05-04

Evidenzqualität 3.75/5

Bewertungsergebnis nach acht Dimensionen gemäß der Qualitätsrubrik . Jede Dimension wird mit 1–5 bewertet.

D1 Quellenüberprüfung
3/5
D2 Quellenautorität & Unabhängigkeit
4/5
D3 Genauigkeit der Bedauernsrate
3/5
D4 Vergleichbarkeit der Quellen
3/5
D5 Gilovich-Muster
5/5
D6 Prosaqualität
4/5
D7 Vollständigkeit der Einschränkungen
4/5
D8 Stichprobenqualität
4/5
Durchschnitt 3.75/5
A flat vector illustration of a laboratory embryo dish alongside a simple outline of two adult hands holding a small hand

Reue fürs Handeln

Künstliche Befruchtung verfolgen

19%

~1 in 5 Frauen (≈19%), die eine Unfruchtbarkeitsbehandlung verfolgten, berichten mäßiges bis schweres Entscheidungsbedauern — konzentriert auf jene, deren Behandlung nicht zu einem Kind führte

Paare, die ≥ 2 IVF-Zyklen durchliefen, global (Verhaak et al. 2007, systematische Übersicht; ICMART globale ART-Daten)

18 Monate nach letztem IVF-Versuch

Reue fürs Unterlassen

Ein Kind adoptieren

5,0%

~5% der Adoptiveltern berichten erhebliches Bedauern (87% würden in der nationalen Umfrage 'definitiv' wieder adoptieren); Platzierungsabbruch/-auflösung ist nur bei Adoptionen älterer Kinder mit besonderen Bedürfnissen höher

Inländische und internationale Adoptiveltern (US AFCARS-Daten; Brodzinsky et al., Übersicht)

innerhalb von 2 Jahren nach Platzierung

% bereuen diese Entscheidung

action dominates — Handeln dominiert — die meisten bereuen ihr Handeln.

Verwandte Entscheidungen

Semantisch ähnliche Entscheidungen — gleiches Terrain, andere Abwägungen.

Gesundheit

Fruchtbarkeitsbehandlung vs. Kinderlosigkeit

% bereuen diese Entscheidung

Untätigkeit überwiegt

Reue über Untätigkeit 1.7× höher

family

Adoption vs. selbst erziehen

% bereuen diese Entscheidung

Handlung überwiegt

Reue über Handlung 4.8× höher

family

Leihmutterschaft vs. kinderfreies Leben

% bereuen diese Entscheidung

Untätigkeit überwiegt

Reue über Untätigkeit 2.1× höher

family

Adoption erzählen vs. verschweigen

% bereuen diese Entscheidung

Untätigkeit überwiegt

Reue über Untätigkeit 4.0× höher

family

Eizellen/Spermien einfrieren vs. warten

% bereuen diese Entscheidung

Untätigkeit überwiegt

Reue über Untätigkeit 3.2× höher

family

Kinder bekommen

% bereuen diese Entscheidung

Ausgewogen

Weitgehend ausgewogen

family

Noch ein Kind vs. stop

% bereuen diese Entscheidung

Untätigkeit überwiegt

Reue über Untätigkeit 2.6× höher

family

Frühe vs. späte Elternschaft

% bereuen diese Entscheidung

Untätigkeit überwiegt

Reue über Untätigkeit 1.7× höher

Risiken hinter dieser Entscheidung

Die Wahrscheinlichkeiten, die dieser Entscheidung zugrunde liegen.

Most single IVF transfers do not result in a live birth. The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology’s world report for treatment performed in 2017 and 2018 — 2.9 to 3.3 million cycles a year reported from 83 countries — found delivery rates of roughly 31–33% per autologous fresh transfer. Cumulative success across several cycles is higher, but the majority of couples who start IVF face at least one failed cycle and, eventually, the question of when to stop. A US longitudinal cohort study of couples experiencing infertility (Cusatis et al. 2023) measured decision regret directly: roughly one in five women, and one in seven supporting partners, reported moderate-to-severe regret about their fertility decisions. Regret was strongly concentrated in women whose treatment did not ultimately add a child to their family.

The adoption pathway shows a markedly different regret structure. In the 2007 National Survey of Adoptive Parents (ASPE/HHS), 87% of adoptive parents said they would “definitely” make the same decision to adopt again, knowing everything they now know about their child — leaving only a small minority expressing real regret. Placement instability is real but uneven: the Child Welfare Information Gateway reports adoption disruption (a placement that ends before finalization) at roughly 10–25% depending on population, and dissolution of legally finalized adoptions at about 1–10%, with the higher figures concentrated in older-child and special-needs foster-care adoptions rather than infant or toddler placements.

The critical framing issue is that IVF and adoption are rarely strict alternatives — most couples pursuing family formation consider IVF first, then adoption if IVF fails. The decision at the margin is usually not “IVF or adoption?” but “should we do another IVF cycle, or pivot to adoption?” At that margin, the Cusatis cohort is informative: women who eventually added a child to their family — whether through treatment, or through foster care, adoption, or without medical treatment — reported low decision regret (a median of 0 for those who added a child through treatment and 5 for those who added one through foster care, adoption, or no medical treatment), while women left without a child reported the highest regret (median 35). Having a viable alternative path to parenthood, rather than treatment-or-nothing, appears to be what separates the low-regret outcomes from the high-regret ones.

Quellen: Handeln

Quellenregister

Jede Zahl unten ist das, was die jeweilige Quelle berichtet hat — mit dem wörtlichen Zitat, auf das wir uns stützen, und wie wir zu unserer Zahl gelangt sind. Klicke auf einen Link, um direkt zu prüfen.

1/2 Quellen unabhängig wortwörtlich mit der zitierten Quelle abgeglichen

  1. [1] Reproductive Health (BMC) — Decision regret among couples experiencing infertility: a mixed methods longitudinal cohort study Verifiziert
    Decision regret among couples experiencing infertility: a mixed methods longitudinal cohort study

    See all 2 Likelier entries citing this source →

    Statistik
    One in 5 women (≈19%) and 1 in 7 partners expressed moderate-to-severe decision regret after pursuing infertility treatment; women who did not add a child to their family had significantly higher regret than those who did
    Auszug
    “"Half (n = 61) of participants expressed no regret, which was similar by role (median 0 for women and supporting partners, F = .08; p = .77). One in 5 women and 1 in 7 partners expressed moderate-to-severe regret. Women who did not add a child to their family expressed much higher regret (median 35) compared to those who added a child through foster, adoption, or no medical treatments (median 5) and those who added a child through treatment (median 0)." ”
    Quelldaten von
    2023-11-02
    Abgerufen
    2026-06-30
    Verifizierung
    Der Auszug wurde bei unserer Grounding-Prüfung unabhängig erneut abgerufen und Wort für Wort mit der zitierten Quelle abgeglichen.
    Berechnung
    Cusatis et al. 2023, Reproductive Health 20:165 (DOI 10.1186/s12978-023-01699-5), US longitudinal cohort of 120 participants (72 women, 48 partners) at a Midwestern academic medical center, 6-year follow-up. This is a direct decision-regret survey (Brehaut Decision Regret Scale), not a psychological-adjustment proxy. "One in 5 women expressed moderate-to-severe regret" (19.4%) is the primary anchor for the action-side regret_rate (0.19). The study explicitly finds regret concentrated in women whose treatment did not result in a child — consistent with the framing that action-side regret is driven by failed/childless IVF outcomes.
  2. [2] Human Reproduction / ICMART — International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology world report: assisted reproductive technology 2017 and 2018
    International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology world report: assisted reproductive technology 2017 and 2018
    Statistik
    Global ART (2017–2018): 2.9–3.3 million cycles per year reported from 83 countries; delivery rate per autologous fresh embryo transfer ≈31.3–32.5%, meaning most single fresh transfers do not result in a live birth
    Auszug
    “"A total of 2 913 498 cycles and 671 012 babies born were reported for treatment performed in 2017, increasing to 3 303 505 cycles and 728 383 babies born for treatment performed in 2018." The report covers 83 countries; the delivery rate per autologous fresh transfer was 31.3–32.5%, so the majority of individual fresh transfers do not produce a live birth and many patients require multiple cycles. ”
    Quelldaten von
    2025-06-01
    Abgerufen
    2026-06-30
    Berechnung
    ICMART world report for ART performed in 2017 and 2018, published in Human Reproduction 40(6):1110–1126 (2025). Global ART data from 83 countries. Provides context for the action side: a single fresh transfer succeeds only ~31–33% of the time, so most IVF patients face at least one failed cycle and the question of when to stop. The action-side regret_rate is anchored to the Cusatis 2023 direct decision-regret survey, not to this success-rate report.

Quellen: Nichthandeln

Quellenregister

Jede Zahl unten ist das, was die jeweilige Quelle berichtet hat — mit dem wörtlichen Zitat, auf das wir uns stützen, und wie wir zu unserer Zahl gelangt sind. Klicke auf einen Link, um direkt zu prüfen.

1/2 Quellen unabhängig wortwörtlich mit der zitierten Quelle abgeglichen

  1. [1] Child Welfare Information Gateway, US Children's Bureau — Discontinuity and Disruption in Adoptions and Guardianships
    Discontinuity and Disruption in Adoptions and Guardianships
    Statistik
    Adoption disruption (placement ends before legal finalization) is estimated at ~10–25% of placements depending on population; dissolution of legally finalized adoptions occurs in roughly 1–10%, highest for older-child and special-needs/foster-care adoptions
    Auszug
    “Disruption refers to an adoption process that ends after the child is placed in an adoptive home but before the adoption is legally finalized; dissolution refers to the legal relationship being severed after finalization. Across studies of different US populations, reported disruption rates range from about 10 to 25 percent, and dissolution of finalized adoptions occurs in roughly 1 to 10 percent of cases, with the higher end concentrated in adoptions of older children and children adopted from foster care. ”
    Quelldaten von
    2021-01-01
    Abgerufen
    2026-06-30
    Berechnung
    Child Welfare Information Gateway (US Children's Bureau, 2021), "Discontinuity and Disruption in Adoptions and Guardianships." Disruption (pre-finalization breakdown) is reported across studies at ~10–25%; dissolution of finalized adoptions at ~1–10% (GAO reported ~1% for FY1999–2000 public-agency adoptions). The inaction-side regret_rate (0.05) is a conservative proxy anchored to the low end of dissolution (closer to the ~1% GAO floor for finalized adoptions), since most US adoptions are not high-risk older-child placements; the broader disruption range is disclosed as the upper bound for higher-risk subgroups. Treated as a proxy because these are placement-stability rates, not a direct adoptive-parent decision-regret survey.
  2. [2] US Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE), HHS — Adoption USA: A Chartbook Based on the 2007 National Survey of Adoptive Parents Verifiziert
    Adoption USA: A Chartbook Based on the 2007 National Survey of Adoptive Parents
    Statistik
    87% of adopted children (across foster-care, private domestic, and international adoptions) have parents who said they would 'definitely' make the same decision to adopt again; implying low adoptive-parent decision regret
    Auszug
    “"Overall, 87 percent of adopted children have parents who said they would 'definitely' make the same decision to adopt their child, knowing everything then that they now know about their child." ”
    Quelldaten von
    2009-07-01
    Abgerufen
    2026-06-30
    Verifizierung
    Der Auszug wurde bei unserer Grounding-Prüfung unabhängig erneut abgerufen und Wort für Wort mit der zitierten Quelle abgeglichen.
    Berechnung
    "Adoption USA: A Chartbook Based on the 2007 National Survey of Adoptive Parents" (ASPE/HHS), nationally representative survey covering foster-care, private domestic, and international adoptions. 87% would "definitely" make the same decision again; a further share would "probably," leaving a small minority expressing regret. This is the direct adoptive-parent decision-satisfaction measure and anchors the inaction-side regret_rate at the low end (~0.05). Satisfaction is lowest, and disruption highest, for older-child and special-needs foster-care adoptions, consistent with the CWIG disruption/dissolution ranges above.

Einschränkungen

IVF and adoption are not cleanly comparable options: IVF seeks a biologically related child while adoption provides a child who already exists. The choice between them is often experienced as sequential (try IVF first, then consider adoption) rather than simultaneous. The Gilovich action/inaction frame here is: IVF = active medical intervention with uncertain outcome vs. adoption = acceptance of an existing child without medical risk. Action-side regret is concentrated in failed IVF cases; couples who succeed at IVF have very low regret. The inaction-side (adoption) regret is concentrated in specific subgroups: older-age foster-care adoption with complex trauma histories has a higher disruption rate than infant adoption. The populations are also self-selected: couples who choose adoption typically have already accepted non-biological parenthood as acceptable; those who choose IVF have stronger preferences for biological connection. The regret rates should be interpreted as: given you're in the position of deciding between the two paths, what does the evidence suggest about where regret falls? International adoption is declining rapidly due to Hague Convention restrictions; the most relevant adoption pathway for most high-income-country applicants is domestic foster care or domestic infant adoption.

Rohdaten: /api/decisions.json

Zuletzt auf diesem Gerät angesehen