Saltar al contenido
Likelier

Arrepentimiento por actuar o por no actuar

Hacerse un aumento de senos vs no hacérselo

Si actúas

Hacerse un aumento de senos

7,0%

Si no actúas

No hacerse un aumento de senos

5,0%

Porcentaje de quienes luego se arrepienten de cada elección. Las barras y el registro completo aparecen abajo.


Salud

Última revisión 2026-05-10

Calidad de la evidencia 4.25/5

Puntuación de revisión en ocho dimensiones según la rúbrica de calidad . Cada dimensión puntuada de 1 a 5.

D1 Verificación de fuentes
4/5
D2 Autoridad e independencia de las fuentes
5/5
D3 Precisión de la tasa de arrepentimiento
3/5
D4 Comparabilidad de las fuentes
3/5
D5 Patrón de Gilovich
4/5
D6 Calidad de la prosa
5/5
D7 Completitud de las advertencias
5/5
D8 Calidad de la muestra
5/5
Media 4.25/5
Two identical silhouettes side by side, one with a small surgical consent form resting beneath it, the other bare, on a neutral surface.

Arrepentimiento por acción

Hacerse un aumento de senos

7,0%

~7% se arrepiente del procedimiento (rango 5,1-9,1% entre estudios)

Pacientes de aumento mamario cosmético, revisión sistemática

retrospectivo, típicamente 1-5 años post-procedimiento

Arrepentimiento por inacción

No hacerse un aumento de senos

5,0%

~5% (estimación proxy — no existe encuesta directa de arrepentimiento por inacción)

Mujeres adultas estadounidenses que consideran pero no persiguen procedimientos cosméticos

retrospectivo, sin marco temporal fijo

% que se arrepienten de esta elección

balanced — Equilibrio aproximado — ambas opciones conllevan un arrepentimiento similar.

Decisiones relacionadas

Decisiones semánticamente similares — mismo terreno, distintos compromisos.

Salud

Cirugía estética

% que se arrepienten de esta elección

Equilibrado

Aproximadamente equilibrado

Salud

Brazilian Butt Lift (BBL)

% que se arrepienten de esta elección

Equilibrado

Aproximadamente equilibrado

Salud

Mastectomía preventiva vs. vigilancia

% que se arrepienten de esta elección

Equilibrado

Aproximadamente equilibrado

Salud

Piercing corporal

% que se arrepienten de esta elección

Acción dominante

Arrepentimiento por acción 4.0× mayor

Salud

Corea: cirugía estética vs. rechazar

% que se arrepienten de esta elección

Acción dominante

Arrepentimiento por acción 4.0× mayor

Salud

Trasplante capilar

% que se arrepienten de esta elección

Inacción dominante

Arrepentimiento por inacción 5.0× mayor

Salud

Vasectomía

% que se arrepienten de esta elección

Equilibrado

Aproximadamente equilibrado

lifestyle

Tatuaje

% que se arrepienten de esta elección

Acción dominante

Arrepentimiento por acción 1.6× mayor

Breast augmentation has one of the lowest regret rates in elective cosmetic surgery. A 2024 systematic review in the American Journal of Surgery — the most comprehensive available, covering regret across surgical subspecialties — places the breast-augmentation-specific range at 5.1—9.1%, with a midpoint around 7%. This is substantially lower than body contouring (11—33%) and far lower than many non-cosmetic elective procedures. A separate 2024 meta-analysis of 18,322 patients using the validated BREAST-Q instrument found large post-operative improvements in psychosocial well-being, sexual well- being, and breast satisfaction — domain gains that explain why regret remains modest despite the physical risks of the procedure.

The complication picture is more sobering than the regret rate suggests. Capsular contracture — abnormal scar tissue that hardens around the implant — is a well-documented long-term risk: the Sientra 10-year cohort reported a 10.8% Kaplan-Meier rate. Implant rupture occurs in approximately 7.8% of patients at 10 years. Both complications can require revision surgery; the FDA maintains a Breast Implant Registry to track long-term outcomes. Among patients who later underwent explant for implant illness, a multicenter longitudinal study of 156 patients found that 83.3% reported retroactive regret about the original augmentation decision — though this population is a small, highly selected subset with unusually severe complications.

On the inaction side, no published survey directly measures regret among women who considered but chose not to get breast augmentation. The ASDS consumer survey (70% of Americans considering some cosmetic procedure) and the Ipsos body-dissatisfaction figure (37% feel dissatisfied whenever they look in the mirror) are too broad to function as inaction-regret proxies: both conflate general appearance concern with surgical-specific regret. The 5% inaction estimate is a constructed placeholder — a conservative downward adjustment reflecting that persistent, surgery-specific regret is far less common than diffuse body dissatisfaction. The delta (0.02) should be read as “roughly balanced with a slight action tilt,” not as a precise quantitative claim. Unlike most life decisions, where inaction regret dominates over time, breast augmentation joins the small class of decisions — tattoos, cosmetic surgery broadly — where action regret is at least as common as inaction regret, held up by the physical permanence of the result.

Fuentes: acción

Registro de evidencia

Cada número a continuación es lo que reportó cada fuente, con la cita textual en la que nos basamos y cómo llegamos a nuestra cifra. Haz clic en cualquier enlace para verificarlo directamente.

  1. [1] The American Journal of Surgery — A systematic review of patient regret after surgery
    A systematic review of patient regret after surgery

    See all 2 Likelier entries citing this source →

    Estadística
    Regret after breast augmentation: 5.1–9.1%
    Extracto
    “"Regret after elective plastic surgery operations is significantly higher compared to gender-affirming surgery. The percentage of patients reporting regret ranged from 0 to 47.1% in breast reconstruction, 5.1–9.1% in breast augmentation, and 10.82–33.3% in body contouring." ”
    Datos de la fuente de
    2024-04-30
    Accedido
    2026-05-10
    Cálculo
    2024 AJS systematic review of patient regret across surgical subspecialties. Breast augmentation-specific subrange: 5.1–9.1%. We use 7% as the approximate midpoint. This is the most procedure-specific regret figure available in the peer-reviewed literature for cosmetic breast augmentation.
  2. [2] Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery — Quality of life and satisfaction after breast augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Breast-Q patient-reported outcomes
    Quality of life and satisfaction after breast augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Breast-Q patient-reported outcomes
    Estadística
    Significant improvements across all BREAST-Q domains post-augmentation (39 studies, 18,322 patients): psychosocial well-being +38.10, sexual well-being +40.20, satisfaction with breast +47.88
    Extracto
    “"[Paraphrase from abstract -- full text paywalled] The pairwise meta-analysis of 39 studies comprising 53 patient cohorts and 18,322 patients revealed significant improvements in patient-reported psychosocial well-being (MD +38.10), sexual well-being (MD +40.20), and satisfaction with breast (MD +47.88) after breast augmentation (all p < 0.00001). BREAST-Q scores increased from 37.2, 31.1, and 26.3 to 75.0, 70.6, and 72.7 respectively." ”
    Datos de la fuente de
    2024-06-01
    Accedido
    2026-05-10
    Cálculo
    2024 systematic review and meta-analysis of BREAST-Q outcomes. The high post-operative satisfaction scores (medians in the 70s on a 100-point scale) are consistent with the relatively low 7% regret rate. The large magnitude of improvement across psychosocial and sexual well-being domains explains why regret remains modest despite the risks of complications. Used as corroborating context, not the primary regret rate source.
  3. [3] Brazilian Journal of Plastic Surgery (RBCP) — Breast silicone explant: a multicenter longitudinal study
    Breast silicone explant: a multicenter longitudinal study
    Estadística
    83.3% of patients who underwent breast implant explantation reported regret about the original augmentation decision (n=156)
    Extracto
    “"Of the patients evaluated, 83.3% reported regret having had the implant surgery, while 0.6% regretted having had the explant surgery." ”
    Datos de la fuente de
    2022-01-01
    Accedido
    2026-07-03
    Cálculo
    Multicenter longitudinal observational study of 156 patients who underwent breast silicone explantation (Rev Bras Cir Plast 2022;37, DOI 10.5935/2177-1235.2022RBCP0026). Cited in body prose as context for the explant-for-illness subgroup: patients who progress to explant report very high retroactive regret about the original augmentation decision, but this is a small, highly selected, severe-complication subset, not representative of the general augmentation population used for the 5.1-9.1% action-regret range above. Not used to compute the action_side regret_rate (0.07), which remains anchored to the AJS systematic review.

Fuentes: inacción

Registro de evidencia

Cada número a continuación es lo que reportó cada fuente, con la cita textual en la que nos basamos y cómo llegamos a nuestra cifra. Haz clic en cualquier enlace para verificarlo directamente.

  1. [1] American Society for Dermatologic Surgery (ASDS) — ASDS Survey: Seven Out of Ten Consumers Considering Cosmetic Procedures
    ASDS Survey: Seven Out of Ten Consumers Considering Cosmetic Procedures
    Estadística
    70% of consumers considering a cosmetic dermatologic procedure
    Extracto
    “"Seven out of ten consumers are considering cosmetic procedures, according to the ASDS consumer survey. The consideration rate has risen steadily over the past decade." ”
    Datos de la fuente de
    2025-03-01
    Accedido
    2026-05-10
    Cálculo
    ASDS annual consumer survey. The 70% figure encompasses all cosmetic procedures including minimally invasive (Botox, fillers), not surgical augmentation specifically. No published survey directly asks women who chose not to pursue breast augmentation whether they regret that inaction. The 5% is a conservative proxy: interest in cosmetic procedures is high, but converting curiosity into sustained inaction regret specific to breast augmentation is much rarer. This is an order-of-magnitude placeholder, not a measured finding.
  2. [2] Ipsos — Most Americans Experience Feeling Dissatisfied with How Their Body Looks from Time to Time
    Most Americans Experience Feeling Dissatisfied with How Their Body Looks from Time to Time

    See all 3 Likelier entries citing this source →

    Estadística
    37% of Americans feel dissatisfied with their body whenever they look in the mirror
    Extracto
    “"Most Americans experience feeling dissatisfied with how their body looks from time to time, including nearly two in five who feel this way whenever they look in the mirror." ”
    Datos de la fuente de
    2018-01-10
    Accedido
    2026-05-10
    Cálculo
    Ipsos nationally representative survey of 1,005 US adults. The 37% body dissatisfaction figure is a broad measure of appearance distress, not a breast-augmentation-specific regret measure. A small fraction of women with persistent chest-related body dissatisfaction who never pursue augmentation may carry lasting inaction regret, but this sub-fraction has not been measured. The 5% proxy is a downward adjustment from 37%, accounting for the fact that body dissatisfaction is far more common than regret specifically about not pursuing surgery.

Advertencias

Los dos lados no son metodológicamente comparables. La estimación del 7% de arrepentimiento por acción se extrae del subrango 5,1-9,1% en una revisión sistemática AJS 2024 — datos genuinos revisados por pares con granularidad específica del procedimiento. La estimación del 5% de inacción es un proxy construido: ninguna encuesta de muestra grande ha preguntado nunca a mujeres que eligieron no hacerse un aumento de senos si se arrepienten de esa decisión. La tasa de consideración cosmética del ASDS (70%) y la tasa de insatisfacción corporal de Ipsos (37%) son demasiado amplias para funcionar como medidas directas de arrepentimiento por inacción. La verdadera tasa de inacción es desconocida y podría ser mayor o menor al 5%. Varios factores también complican la tasa por acción: los estudios con seguimiento más largo tienden a mostrar mayor arrepentimiento a medida que se acumulan las complicaciones (las tasas de contractura capsular alcanzan el 10,8% a los 10 años según la cohorte Sientra, y la ruptura de implante alcanza el 7,8% a los 10 años), mientras que los estudios a 1-2 años reportan tasas de satisfacción superiores al 90%. El delta (0,02) refleja un perfil Gilovich aproximadamente balanceado, con un ligero sesgo hacia el arrepentimiento por acción — lo cual es una verdadera inversión del patrón típico de dominio de inacción. Las tasas de arrepentimiento no deben extrapolarse a poblaciones fuera de los Estados Unidos o a cirugía mamaria no electiva (reconstrucción, reducción), que conllevan perfiles de arrepentimiento muy diferentes.

Datos brutos: /api/decisions.json

Vistos recientemente en este dispositivo