Porcentagem de quem mais tarde se arrepende de cada escolha. As barras e o registro completo aparecem abaixo.
Estilo de vida
Última revisão 2026-04-26
Qualidade das evidências 3.75/5
Pontuação de revisão em oito dimensões segundo a
grelha de qualidade
. Cada dimensão pontuada de 1 a 5.
D1 Verificação das fontes
4/5
D2 Autoridade e independência das fontes
3/5
D3 Precisão da taxa de arrependimento
2/5
D4 Comparabilidade das fontes
3/5
D5 Padrão de Gilovich
5/5
D6 Qualidade da prosa
5/5
D7 Completude das ressalvas
5/5
D8 Qualidade da amostra
3/5
Média3.75/5
Dados proxy — não existe nenhuma pesquisa direta sobre arrependimento para esta decisão. As taxas são derivadas de pontuações de satisfação e dados de barreiras de acesso em vez de perguntas que perguntavam diretamente sobre arrependimento. Veja advertências abaixo.
Arrependimento por ação
Permanecer nas redes sociais
45%
45% arrependem-se do uso intenso das redes sociais em anos mais jovens
Adultos na Ásia-Pacífico, painel online (usuários ativos de redes sociais)
retrospectivo, sem prazo fixo
Arrependimento por omissão
Apagar as contas de redes sociais
14%
~14% de quem eliminou o Facebook relatou nenhuma mudança na felicidade (0% ficaram menos felizes) — um teto neutro de satisfação, não arrependimento medido
Adultos nos EUA que deletaram ou desativaram o Facebook
retrospectivo, sem prazo fixo
% se arrependem desta escolha
Permanecer nas redes sociaisApagar as contas de redes sociais
45%14%
action dominates — A acção domina — a maioria arrepende-se de ter agido.
Decisões relacionadas
Decisões semanticamente semelhantes — mesmo terreno, compromissos diferentes.
Nearly 45% of adults who are active on social media say they regret
how much they used it when they were younger, according to a Kaspersky
survey of 1,240 working professionals across six Asia-Pacific countries
(Australia, India, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Vietnam). On the
other side, Security.org’s survey of 1,012 US adults found that roughly
14% of those who deleted Facebook reported no change in happiness
afterward, 86% described themselves as happier, and 0% said they were
less happy. That survey never asks “do you regret deleting?”, so the
true deletion-regret rate it implies is closer to zero than to 14% — the
~14% is the satisfaction-neutral group, a conservative ceiling rather
than a measured regret rate. The implied ratio favors
deletion, but the comparison is imprecise: one survey measures
retrospective volume regret among current users, the other measures
post-deletion mood among a self-selected group of quitters.
The strongest experimental evidence comes from Hunt, Marx, Lipson, and
Young (2018) at the University of Pennsylvania. In a randomized
controlled trial, 143 undergraduates were assigned to either limit
Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat to 10 minutes per platform per day or
use social media as usual for three weeks. The limited-use group showed
significant reductions in loneliness and depression compared to
controls over the three weeks. This is one of the few studies
establishing a causal (not merely correlational) link between social
media reduction and improved well-being.
The main weakness in framing this as a clean action-vs-inaction pair is
that “deleting social media” is rarely a permanent, total act. Many
deleters migrate to other platforms, reactivate after a few months, or
simply reduce usage without full deletion. The Security.org survey
focused exclusively on Facebook, not all social media. The Kaspersky
figure applies to Asia-Pacific professionals, not a globally
representative sample. What the data does suggest, directionally, is that
sustained heavy use generates more stated regret than leaving does —
a finding corroborated by Hunt et al.’s experimental evidence that
reduction causes genuine well-being improvement.
Fontes: acção
Registro de evidências
Cada número abaixo é o que cada fonte relatou, com a citação literal em que nos baseamos e como chegamos ao nosso valor. Clique em qualquer link para verificar diretamente.
1/2 fontes verificadas de forma independente palavra por palavra em relação à fonte citada
[1]Cyber Magazine / Kaspersky — 45% of people regret using social media in younger years
Verificado
Fonte de referência
45% of respondents regret using social media as much as they did when they were younger
Trecho
“"45 percent of people regret using social media as much as they did when they were younger. Old social posts can present challenges with job applications and progression."
”
Dados da fonte de
2020-09-15
Acessado
2026-04-26
Verificação
Trecho obtido novamente de forma independente e confirmado palavra por palavra em relação à fonte citada durante nossa auditoria de fundamentação.
Cálculo
Kaspersky Digital Reputation Economy survey conducted by YouGov in November 2020 across six Asia-Pacific countries (Australia, India, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Vietnam), n = 1,240 working professionals who use social media at least 1 hour/day. The 45% figure captures retrospective regret about volume of past social media use, not current-session regret. Population is Asia-Pacific, not global — earlier descriptions of this as a "global" survey were inaccurate.
[2]Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology — No More FOMO: Limiting Social Media Decreases Loneliness and Depression
Revisado por pares
Limiting social media to 30 minutes/day significantly reduced loneliness and depression over 3 weeks compared to unrestricted use
Trecho
“"The limited use group showed significant reductions in loneliness and depression over three weeks compared to the control group."
”
Dados da fonte de
2018-11-01
Acessado
2026-04-26
Cálculo
Hunt, Marx, Lipson & Young (2018), University of Pennsylvania. 143 undergraduates randomized to limit Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat to 10 min each/day vs use-as-usual for 3 weeks. Limited-use group showed significant reductions in loneliness and depression. Provides experimental evidence that reduced use improves well-being, supporting the action-side regret finding. Does not provide a binary regret rate itself.
Fontes: inacção
Registro de evidências
Cada número abaixo é o que cada fonte relatou, com a citação literal em que nos baseamos e como chegamos ao nosso valor. Clique em qualquer link para verificar diretamente.
1/2 fontes verificadas de forma independente palavra por palavra em relação à fonte citada
[1]Security.org — Detailing the Delete Facebook Phenomenon
Verificado
Fonte de referência
Of those who deleted/deactivated Facebook: 45.6% significantly happier, 40.5% slightly happier, 13.9% neither more nor less happy, 0% less happy. The survey measures happiness change, not regret.
Trecho
“"Nearly half of them (46 percent) said they were significantly happier after getting rid of Facebook, while 41 percent said it made them slightly happier."
”
Dados da fonte de
2021-01-15
Acessado
2026-04-26
Verificação
Trecho obtido novamente de forma independente e confirmado palavra por palavra em relação à fonte citada durante nossa auditoria de fundamentação.
Cálculo
Security.org surveyed 1,012 US adults who had ever held a Facebook account. Among those who deleted or deactivated, the happiness breakdown was: 45.6% significantly happier, 40.5% slightly happier (86% happier total), 13.9% neither more nor less happy, and 0% less happy (0% slightly less + 0% significantly less). The survey asks ONLY about happiness change — it never asks "do you regret deleting?" Because 0% reported being less happy, the true deletion-regret rate implied by this data is near zero, not 14%. The ~14% we surface is the satisfaction-NEUTRAL group used as a conservative ceiling on the share who felt no benefit — a proxy, not a measured regret rate (hence proxy_only: true). Note: article was updated/republished in 2025 but original data collection was 2021.
[2]University of Michigan / Michigan Medicine — Many young people recognize negative impact of social media and have considered deleting accounts
Estudo primário
More than half of 14-24-year-olds have deleted or thought about deleting social media accounts due to bullying, misinformation, safety risks, and distressing content
Trecho
“"More than half of respondents ages 14-24 said they've deleted or thought about deleting accounts. Reasons include bullying, misinformation, safety risks, fakeness and distressing content."
”
Dados da fonte de
2022-11-01
Acessado
2026-04-26
Cálculo
University of Michigan C.S. Mott Children's Hospital National Poll on Children's Health, November 2022. Over 50% of young people have deleted or considered deleting accounts. Corroborates that deletion intent is common and driven by negative experiences, not impulsive decisions likely to generate regret.
Ressalvas
The action and inaction figures come from different surveys with different populations and different operationalizations of "regret." The Kaspersky 45% measures retrospective regret about past usage volume among Asia-Pacific working professionals (not "global" as previously described — the survey was conducted by YouGov in six Asia-Pacific countries in November 2020). The Security.org ~14% is an imputed ceiling: it is the satisfaction-neutral group ("neither more nor less happy", 13.9%) from a happiness measure among US Facebook deleters — not a direct regret question. Critically, 0% of deleters said they were less happy, so the true deletion-regret rate implied by the data is near zero; the ~14% is a conservative upper bound on the share who felt no benefit, carried as a proxy (proxy_only: true). These are different constructs (stated regret about volume vs happiness change after deletion) measured on different populations (Asia-Pacific professionals vs US Facebook users). Hunt et al. (2018, U Penn, n=143) provides the strongest experimental evidence: randomly limiting social media to 30 min/day significantly reduced depression and loneliness, suggesting that heavy use genuinely causes harm rather than merely correlating with it. Facebook deletion is not equivalent to deleting all social media; people who leave one platform often migrate to another. The roughly 3:1 ratio should be read as directionally suggestive — those who stay are more likely to express regret than those who leave — but the precise magnitude is weakly grounded.
