Saltar al contenido
Likelier

Arrepentimiento por actuar o por no actuar

Elegir una hipoteca de tasa fija versus una hipoteca de tasa ajustable

Si actúas

Hipoteca a tipo variable

43%

Si no actúas

Hipoteca a tipo fijo

12%

Porcentaje de quienes luego se arrepienten de cada elección. Las barras y el registro completo aparecen abajo.


Financiero

Última revisión 2026-05-13

Calidad de la evidencia 3.88/5

Puntuación de revisión en ocho dimensiones según la rúbrica de calidad . Cada dimensión puntuada de 1 a 5.

D1 Verificación de fuentes
4/5
D2 Autoridad e independencia de las fuentes
3/5
D3 Precisión de la tasa de arrepentimiento
3/5
D4 Comparabilidad de las fuentes
2/5
D5 Patrón de Gilovich
5/5
D6 Calidad de la prosa
5/5
D7 Completitud de las advertencias
5/5
D8 Calidad de la muestra
4/5
Media 3.88/5
Two house keys on a table, one on a stable flat surface, one balanced on a tilting surface.

Arrepentimiento por acción

Hipoteca a tipo variable

43%

43% de los prestatarios ARM se arrepiente de haber elegido una hipoteca a tasa ajustable

Propietarios estadounidenses con hipoteca a tasa ajustable, panel en línea

encuestado en diciembre 2022, después de que comenzaran los aumentos de tasas de la Reserva Federal

Arrepentimiento por inacción

Hipoteca a tipo fijo

12%

~12% de los tenedores de hipotecas a tasa fija se arrepiente de aspectos relacionados con la tasa hipotecaria de su compra de vivienda

Propietarios estadounidenses, muestra en línea representativa a nivel nacional

encuestado en abril 2025

% que se arrepienten de esta elección

action dominates — Domina la acción — la mayoría se arrepiente de actuar.

Decisiones relacionadas

Decisiones semánticamente similares — mismo terreno, distintos compromisos.

FinancieroDirecta

Justo vs. de más

% que se arrepienten de esta elección

Acción dominante

Arrepentimiento por acción 1.6× mayor

Financiero

Renovación del hogar

% que se arrepienten de esta elección

Acción dominante

Arrepentimiento por acción 2.3× mayor

FinancieroDirecta

Comprar casa

% que se arrepienten de esta elección

Inacción dominante

Arrepentimiento por inacción 5.6× mayor

Financiero

Negociación del alquiler

% que se arrepienten de esta elección

Inacción dominante

Arrepentimiento por inacción 1.9× mayor

Financiero

Negociar el precio del coche

% que se arrepienten de esta elección

Inacción dominante

Arrepentimiento por inacción 1.6× mayor

Financiero

Renunciar a inspección del inmueble

% que se arrepienten de esta elección

Acción dominante

Arrepentimiento por acción 3.1× mayor

Financiero

Seguro a término vs. seguro de vida entera

% que se arrepienten de esta elección

Inacción dominante

Arrepentimiento por inacción 6.4× mayor

Financiero

Cripto vs. inversión tradicional

% que se arrepienten de esta elección

Acción dominante

Arrepentimiento por acción 2.9× mayor

Forty-three percent of US homeowners with an adjustable-rate mortgage reported regretting their choice in a December 2022 survey of 1,203 ARM holders conducted by PureSpectrum for U.S. News & World Report, the larger and earlier-fielded of the two ARM-regret surveys cited here. The primary driver, cited by 44% of regretters, was that their interest rate had adjusted to a higher level than they anticipated. A follow-up survey by Point in January 2024, drawing on 332 ARM holders, placed the regret rate at 70%, consistent with the pattern of escalating regret as further Federal Reserve rate increases pushed variable payments well above their initial levels. By contrast, the fixed-rate regret rate — proxied from Bankrate’s 2025 general homeowner survey (n=1,363), where roughly 90% of respondents hold fixed-rate loans — runs substantially lower: approximately 12%, reflecting owners who locked in at elevated 2022-2024 rates and carry payment regret without regretting the choice of a fixed product over a variable one.

The evidence base is asymmetric. Both ARM surveys asked a direct regret question to ARM holders specifically; the fixed-rate figure is a cross-survey proxy, not a head-to-head comparison. No published study has asked matched samples of ARM and fixed-rate borrowers the same regret question in the same instrument. The direction of the asymmetry is nonetheless robust: the ARM regret rate climbed from 43% to 70% between the two survey waves as the rate environment deteriorated, while fixed-rate holders’ payment complaints remained bounded by the absence of unexpected rate changes. In the US context, the fixed-rate mortgage is the dominant default (over 90% of originations since 2010), so choosing an ARM represents an active deviation from that default — a bet that rates would stay low. Borrowers who took that bet during 2019-2022 and then faced resets into a 7%-rate environment bear the hallmarks of action regret: a counterfactual (the fixed product they passed up) that is concrete, specific, and visible in every mortgage statement.

The survey timing matters for interpretation. Both ARM surveys were fielded during or shortly after a historically rapid rate-tightening cycle (2022-2023), creating a period of maximum regret exposure. ARM regret in a falling-rate environment would likely be far lower, since resets would land at or below the initial rate rather than well above it, and fixed-rate holders might then experience their own form of regret for not capturing the lower variable rates. The 43% figure (the more conservative primary estimate) is a rate-cycle-specific snapshot, not a structural truth about the product. What is structural is the uncertainty asymmetry: fixed-rate borrowers know their payment in advance; ARM borrowers do not. That uncertainty is the proximate cause of regret in both surveys, not the product category per se.

Fuentes: acción

Registro de evidencia

Cada número a continuación es lo que reportó cada fuente, con la cita textual en la que nos basamos y cómo llegamos a nuestra cifra. Haz clic en cualquier enlace para verificarlo directamente.

  1. [1] U.S. News & World Report / PureSpectrum — ARM Borrowers Gamble Short-Term Savings on Long-Term Risk
    ARM Borrowers Gamble Short-Term Savings on Long-Term Risk
    Estadística
    43% of ARM borrowers regret choosing an adjustable-rate mortgage; the most common reason was that their interest rate adjusted to a higher rate than expected (44% of regretters)
    Extracto
    “"Forty-three percent of survey respondents regret choosing an ARM. Among them, the most common reason was that their interest rate adjusted to a higher rate than expected." ”
    Datos de la fuente de
    2022-12-20
    Accedido
    2026-05-13
    Cálculo
    U.S. News & World Report commissioned PureSpectrum to conduct a nationwide online survey of 1,203 homeowners who currently hold an adjustable-rate mortgage, fielded December 14-20, 2022. Only ARM holders participated. The 43% regret rate is a direct self-report and is used here as the action-side regret rate without adjustment. The survey was conducted at the peak of the 2022 Federal Reserve tightening cycle, when the federal funds rate had risen from near-zero to 4.25-4.50% in under 12 months, so the 43% figure reflects rate-hike conditions and may understate regret relative to the longer-run reset exposure faced by 3/1 and 5/1 ARM holders who originated in 2019-2021.
  2. [2] Point / SurveyMonkey — 70% of Homeowners with an Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Regret It
    70% of Homeowners with an Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Regret It
    Estadística
    70% of homeowners who have taken out an adjustable-rate mortgage in the past 10 years regret it (January 2024, n=332)
    Extracto
    “"70% of homeowners who have taken out an adjustable-rate mortgage in the past 10 years regret it." ”
    Datos de la fuente de
    2024-01-20
    Accedido
    2026-05-13
    Cálculo
    Point (a home equity investment platform) commissioned a SurveyMonkey online panel survey of 332 homeowners who obtained an ARM within the prior 10 years, fielded January 20, 2024. The 70% regret rate is the primary reported finding. The sample is smaller (332) and the platform is an industry participant with a commercial interest in home equity products, so this figure is treated as a corroborating upper-bound estimate rather than the primary rate. The primary rate used in regret_rate is 0.43 (U.S. News/PureSpectrum, n=1,203), which has a larger sample, an independent research firm, and was fielded closer to the moment of rate shock. The Point figure (70%, n=332, 13 months later) is consistent with escalating regret as further rate resets occurred through 2023.

Fuentes: inacción

Registro de evidencia

Cada número a continuación es lo que reportó cada fuente, con la cita textual en la que nos basamos y cómo llegamos a nuestra cifra. Haz clic en cualquier enlace para verificarlo directamente.

  1. [1] Bankrate / YouGov — Bankrate's 2025 Home Affordability Report
    Bankrate's 2025 Home Affordability Report
    Estadística
    10% of homeowners specifically regret not getting the best mortgage rate; 16% regret that their mortgage payment is too high; nearly half (45%) of homeowners overall have at least one regret about their home purchase
    Extracto
    “"Among homeowners with regrets, the most common complaints included maintenance and other hidden costs being more expensive than anticipated (42%), mortgage payment being too high (16%), and not getting the best mortgage rate (10%)." ”
    Datos de la fuente de
    2025-06-01
    Accedido
    2026-05-13
    Cálculo
    Bankrate's 2025 Home Affordability Report surveyed 2,487 adults (1,363 current homeowners) via YouGov online panel (April 2-4, 2025), with demographic quotas for representativeness. The survey did not separately ask fixed-rate vs. ARM holders about their mortgage-type choice; it asked all homeowners about homeownership regrets broadly. The inaction-side regret rate of 0.12 is derived as follows: nearly half (45%) of homeowners report at least one regret; within that group, mortgage-rate-related items total approximately 16% (payment too high) + 10% (didn't get best rate) = 26% of regretters cite mortgage-rate issues, giving 0.45 × 0.26 ≈ 0.117 (rounded to 0.12). Because ~90% of US mortgages originated since 2010 are fixed-rate (FHFA data), the vast majority of this homeowner sample holds fixed-rate loans, so this share is used as a proxy for the fixed-rate side. This is a proxy estimate; no survey directly asks fixed-rate holders whether they regret not choosing an ARM.
  2. [2] National Mortgage News — Adjustable-rate mortgage borrowers express regret over loans
    Adjustable-rate mortgage borrowers express regret over loans
    Estadística
    Approximately 70% of ARM holders say they now regret their choice, driven by interest-rate rises since 2022 to more than two-decade highs (Point survey, January)
    Extracto
    “"Approximately 70% of ARM holders, including homeowners in both the introductory and variable-rate phase, said they now regret their choice. The rise of interest rates since 2022 to more than two-decade highs drove the sentiment, as ARM borrowers find a substantially different financial environment today versus the last 10 years." ”
    Datos de la fuente de
    2024-01-20
    Accedido
    2026-05-13
    Cálculo
    National Mortgage News coverage of the Point (SurveyMonkey) ARM-regret survey fielded in January 2024. Reports the same headline finding as the Point source above (~70% of ARM holders regret their choice), attributing the sentiment to the 2022 onward rate rises. Used here as a second, independent outlet corroborating the elevated ARM-regret level that underpins the action-vs-inaction asymmetry. No independent new data beyond the Point survey it reports.

Advertencias

Las cifras lado acción y lado inacción no provienen de una sola encuesta comparativa. Ningún estudio publicado ha preguntado a muestras emparejadas de prestatarios ARM y a tasa fija la misma pregunta de arrepentimiento en la misma ola de encuesta. La tasa de arrepentimiento ARM (43%) proviene de una encuesta limitada exclusivamente a tenedores de ARM (U.S. News/PureSpectrum, diciembre 2022, n=1.203); la tasa de arrepentimiento a tasa fija (12%) es un proxy derivado de una encuesta general de propietarios (Bankrate/YouGov, abril 2025, n=1.363 propietarios) que no segmentó por tipo de hipoteca. Debido a que aproximadamente el 90% de las hipotecas estadounidenses son a tasa fija, la muestra Bankrate está dominada por tenedores de tasa fija, haciéndola un comparador razonable si impreciso. Ambas encuestas se realizaron durante un entorno de tasas elevadas (2022-2025), lo que amplifica el arrepentimiento ARM y también puede inflar el arrepentimiento de pago a tasa fija entre quienes bloquearon al 6-7% en 2022-2024. La asimetría del arrepentimiento es direccionalmente robusta entre dos encuestas ARM independientes con fechas de campo y muestras diferentes (43% en diciembre 2022; 70% en enero 2024), pero el delta preciso es incierto. En el contexto estadounidense, la hipoteca a tasa fija es el predeterminado dominante (más del 90% de las originaciones desde 2010), por lo que elegir un ARM representa una desviación activa — una apuesta de que las tasas se mantendrían bajas — haciendo del ARM el lado acción y la tasa fija el lado inacción según el marco de Gilovich.

Datos brutos: /api/decisions.json

Vistos recientemente en este dispositivo