Lewati ke konten
Likelier

Penyesalan bertindak vs. tidak bertindak

Melahirkan secara caesar atau persalinan pervaginam

Jika Anda bertindak

Persalinan caesar

19%

Jika Anda tidak bertindak

Persalinan normal

7,0%

Persentase orang yang kemudian menyesali setiap pilihan. Diagram batang dan catatan lengkap ditampilkan di bawah.


Family

Terakhir ditinjau 2026-05-04

Kualitas bukti 4.38/5

Skor tinjauan delapan dimensi terhadap rubrik kualitas . Setiap dimensi dinilai 1–5.

D1 Verifikasi sumber
5/5
D2 Otoritas & independensi sumber
4/5
D3 Akurasi tingkat penyesalan
3/5
D4 Keterbandingan sumber
3/5
D5 Pola Gilovich
5/5
D6 Kualitas prosa
5/5
D7 Kelengkapan peringatan
5/5
D8 Kualitas sampel
5/5
Rata-rata 4.38/5
Two abstract door-like shapes side by side, one clinical and angular, one organic and rounded, flat vector in muted tones.

Penyesalan atas tindakan

Persalinan caesar

19%

19% wanita yang melahirkan caesar tidak puas dengan pengalaman kelahiran (proksi ketidakpuasan)

Wanita yang melahirkan dengan operasi caesar di Skotlandia, direkrut melalui survei pos (terencana dan tidak terencana campuran)

retrospektif, waktu bervariasi sejak persalinan

Penyesalan atas kelambanan

Persalinan normal

7,0%

7% wanita memiliki pengalaman kelahiran negatif pada 1 tahun pascapersalinan (proksi pengalaman negatif)

Wanita Swedia direkrut di semua klinik antenatal nasional, dinilai 1 tahun setelah persalinan (sebagian besar kelahiran vaginal mengingat tingkat C-section nasional ~15%)

1 tahun setelah persalinan

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

action dominates — Bertindak mendominasi — sebagian besar menyesali karena bertindak.

Keputusan terkait

Keputusan yang serupa secara semantik — area yang sama, kompromi yang berbeda.

family

Adopsi vs. besarkan sendiri

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Tindakan mendominasi

Penyesalan bertindak 4.8× lebih tinggi

family

ASI vs susu formula

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Ketidakaktifan mendominasi

Penyesalan tidak bertindak 4.5× lebih tinggi

family

Memiliki anak

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Seimbang

Hampir seimbang

KesehatanLangsung

Keputusan aborsi

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Seimbang

Hampir seimbang

Kesehatan

Ligasi tuba

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Tindakan mendominasi

Penyesalan bertindak 1.4× lebih tinggi

family

Orang tua muda vs. tunda

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Ketidakaktifan mendominasi

Penyesalan tidak bertindak 1.7× lebih tinggi

family

Di rumah vs bekerja

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Tindakan mendominasi

Penyesalan bertindak 1.3× lebih tinggi

family

Mediasi keluarga vs. litigasi

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Ketidakaktifan mendominasi

Penyesalan tidak bertindak 3.1× lebih tinggi

Cesarean delivery carries roughly three times the negative-experience rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery across the available survey and outcomes literature: 19% of cesarean-delivery women in a large Scottish postal study reported dissatisfaction with their birth (Porter et al. 2007, n=1,661), compared to 7% of women in a national Swedish cohort who rated their birth — predominantly vaginal — as a negative experience one year later (Waldenström et al. 2004, n=2,541). The PTSD literature corroborates the direction: spontaneous vaginal birth produces the lowest postpartum PTSD rates of any delivery mode (1.8% at 6+ months, Ginter 2022 integrative review), while emergency cesarean sits at the top (4.8%), with elective cesarean and instrumental vaginal between them.

The critical within-group caveat is that unplanned cesareans drive most of the negative signal. Konheim-Kalkstein & Miron-Shatz (2021) found 73% regret among 227 US women with unplanned cesareans as their only birth — but the regret was predominantly inaction-flavored, centering on not having advocated for themselves during labor, rather than regretting the surgical procedure itself. Women who chose a planned elective cesarean fared far better: Coates et al. (2021) found 85% were satisfied with their decision-making process. The 19% average action-side rate masks wide within-group variation: planned/elective cesarean carries markedly less dissatisfaction than unplanned cesarean, where Konheim-Kalkstein & Miron-Shatz found 73% regret — depending almost entirely on whether the procedure was chosen or imposed by circumstances.

The direction is consistent with the Gilovich inaction-versus-action pattern: the shorter-term satisfaction advantage of elective cesarean (control, predictability, pain management) reflects known short-horizon benefits, while the negative-experience and PTSD data above suggest the psychological costs of operative delivery are what compound rather than fade. Long-term, decade-scale survey data directly comparing fulfillment or regret by delivery mode remains sparse in the literature — an evidence gap rather than a null finding. The absence of direct “regret about not having a cesarean” survey data from vaginal-delivery populations is itself informative: the construct is rarely studied because the experience is relatively rarely reported.

Sumber: tindakan

Buku besar klaim

Setiap angka di bawah ini adalah apa yang dilaporkan masing-masing sumber, dengan kutipan kata demi kata yang kami andalkan dan bagaimana kami sampai pada angka kami. Klik tautan mana saja untuk memverifikasi langsung.

3/3 sumber diverifikasi secara independen kata demi kata terhadap sumber terkutip

  1. [1] Birth / Porter, van Teijlingen, Yip & Bhattacharya — Satisfaction with cesarean section: qualitative analysis of open-ended questions in a large postal survey Terverifikasi
    Satisfaction with cesarean section: qualitative analysis of open-ended questions in a large postal survey
    Statistik
    81% of cesarean-delivery women were satisfied with the birth experience; 19% were not satisfied
    Kutipan
    “"Eighty-one percent of women were satisfied with the experience. Thirty-six percent rated at least one aspect of their caesarean section as distressing. Forty-two percent provided written descriptions of distressing experiences, of which 66% described psychological or communication-related issues." ”
    Data sumber dari
    2007-06-01
    Diakses
    2026-05-04
    Verifikasi
    Kutipan diambil ulang secara independen dan dikonfirmasi kata demi kata terhadap sumber terkutip selama audit pendasaran kami.
    Perhitungan
    Porter et al. (2007) conducted a postal survey of all women in Grampian, Scotland who delivered by cesarean in a 2-year period; 1,661 responded (75% response rate). Satisfaction item was binary; 81% reported satisfied, leaving 19% as the dissatisfied/negative-experience proportion used as the regret proxy. Mixed planned and unplanned cesareans; emergency cesarean carries substantially higher dissatisfaction rates (see Konheim-Kalkstein below for unplanned-only data). The 19% figure is the primary action-side rate because it covers the full cesarian population, not only emergency cases.
    Independensi
    Population-based postal survey in Scotland; independent of the US-based Konheim-Kalkstein study below.
  2. [2] Journal of Health Psychology / Konheim-Kalkstein & Miron-Shatz — 'If only I had . . .': Regrets from women with an unplanned cesarean delivery Terverifikasi
    'If only I had . . .': Regrets from women with an unplanned cesarean delivery
    Statistik
    73% of women with unplanned cesarean as their only birth reported regret; regret centered on inaction, particularly not advocating for the self
    Kutipan
    “"Seventy-three percent of women reported regret which mostly centered on inaction, particularly not advocating for the self. Those with regrets reported lower birth satisfaction (t(220) = 4.84, p < .001). Only emotional support was associated with lower likelihood of experiencing regret (p < .001)." ”
    Data sumber dari
    2019-12-03
    Diakses
    2026-05-04
    Verifikasi
    Kutipan diambil ulang secara independen dan dikonfirmasi kata demi kata terhadap sumber terkutip selama audit pendasaran kami.
    Perhitungan
    Konheim-Kalkstein & Miron-Shatz (2021) surveyed 227 US women with unplanned cesarean as their only birth. The 73% regret rate is specific to unplanned cesareans; the regret was predominantly inaction-flavored (wishing they had advocated for themselves differently, not necessarily regretting the surgical procedure per se). This rate is cited as secondary context for within-group variation — emergency/unplanned cesareans carry a far higher regret burden than the 19% mixed-sample figure. The action-side regret_rate uses 0.19 (Porter 2007) as the more representative overall population figure.
    Independensi
    Separate US online survey study; independent of Porter's Scottish postal survey in population, country, timing, and methodology.
  3. [3] Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology / Coates, Donnolley, Thirukumar, Lainchbury, Spear & Henry — Women's experiences of decision-making and beliefs in relation to planned caesarean section: A survey study Terverifikasi
    Women's experiences of decision-making and beliefs in relation to planned caesarean section: A survey study
    Statistik
    85% of women were satisfied with the decision-making process for a planned cesarean section, regardless of whether the CS was perceived as requested or recommended
    Kutipan
    “"The majority (85%) of women appeared satisfied with the decision-making process, regardless of whether they perceived their CS as requested or recommended." ”
    Data sumber dari
    2021-02-01
    Diakses
    2026-07-03
    Verifikasi
    Kutipan diambil ulang secara independen dan dikonfirmasi kata demi kata terhadap sumber terkutip selama audit pendasaran kami.
    Perhitungan
    Coates, Donnolley, Thirukumar, Lainchbury, Spear & Henry (2021), Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 61(1):106-115 (published online 2020-09-22). PMID 32964450. Survey of women who had a planned (elective) cesarean section specifically. Cited as within-group context: the 19% dissatisfaction figure used as the primary action-side regret proxy (Porter 2007) mixes planned and unplanned cesareans; this source shows planned/elective cesarean alone carries much higher decision satisfaction (85%) than the mixed sample, corroborating the caveat that regret concentrates in unplanned/emergency cesareans. Not used in regret_rate arithmetic.
    Independensi
    Australian survey study; independent of Porter (Scotland), Konheim-Kalkstein (US), and Waldenström (Sweden) in population, country, and methodology.

Sumber: tidak bertindak

Buku besar klaim

Setiap angka di bawah ini adalah apa yang dilaporkan masing-masing sumber, dengan kutipan kata demi kata yang kami andalkan dan bagaimana kami sampai pada angka kami. Klik tautan mana saja untuk memverifikasi langsung.

1/2 sumber diverifikasi secara independen kata demi kata terhadap sumber terkutip

  1. [1] Birth / Waldenström, Hildingsson, Rubertsson & Rådestad — A Negative Birth Experience: Prevalence and Risk Factors in a National Sample Terverifikasi
    A Negative Birth Experience: Prevalence and Risk Factors in a National Sample
    Statistik
    7% of women had a negative birth experience assessed at 1 year postpartum; risk factors included emergency operative delivery, induction, pain, and lack of control
    Kutipan
    “"Seven percent of the women had a negative birth experience. Risk factors for a negative birth experience included not being treated with respect, lack of emotional support from midwives, emergency cesarean section, instrumental delivery, induction, too much pain, and labor complications." ”
    Data sumber dari
    2004-03-01
    Diakses
    2026-05-04
    Verifikasi
    Kutipan diambil ulang secara independen dan dikonfirmasi kata demi kata terhadap sumber terkutip selama audit pendasaran kami.
    Perhitungan
    Waldenström et al. (2004) recruited 3,061 women at all Swedish antenatal clinics over one calendar year; 2,541 completed the 1-year postal follow-up. At the time of the study, Sweden's national cesarean rate was approximately 15%, meaning the vast majority of participants (approximately 85%) delivered vaginally. The 7% negative-birth-experience rate is therefore broadly representative of vaginal delivery experience. "Negative birth experience" was measured by a validated single-item scale at 1 year; this is a proxy for regret rather than a direct measure of it. Risk factors list emergency cesarean as a distinct category, confirming the vaginal-birth sample dominates the non-negative group.
    Independensi
    National population-based Swedish cohort; fully independent of the UK Porter survey and US Konheim-Kalkstein study in country, era, and methodology.
  2. [2] International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health / Ginter et al. — The Impact of Mode of Birth on Childbirth-Related PTSD Symptoms beyond 6 Months Postpartum: An Integrative Review
    The Impact of Mode of Birth on Childbirth-Related PTSD Symptoms beyond 6 Months Postpartum: An Integrative Review
    Statistik
    Spontaneous vaginal delivery PTSD rate ~1.8% at 6+ months postpartum; emergency cesarean 4.8%; forceps 4.2%
    Kutipan
    “"CB-PTS/D rates by mode at ≥6 months postpartum from the largest cohort included: spontaneous vaginal 1.8%, operative vaginal 4.2%, elective cesarean 3.1%, emergency cesarean 4.8%." ”
    Data sumber dari
    2022-07-11
    Diakses
    2026-05-04
    Perhitungan
    Ginter et al. (2022) integrative review of 26 quantitative and 2 qualitative studies on childbirth-related PTSD by mode of delivery. Spontaneous vaginal birth consistently showed the lowest PTSD rate (1.8%), substantially below emergency cesarean (4.8%) and even elective cesarean (3.1%). These rates support the directional finding that vaginal delivery results in fewer negative psychological outcomes than cesarean (especially emergency) delivery. The PTSD rate (1.8%) is lower than the Waldenström negative-birth-experience rate (7%) because PTSD is a more restrictive clinical construct than general negative experience; both are cited to triangulate the inaction-side estimate.
    Independensi
    Systematic integrative review of 28 studies spanning multiple countries and decades; independent of Waldenström, Porter, and Konheim-Kalkstein.

Catatan

Kedua sisi entri ini mengukur konstruksi terkait tetapi berbeda di berbagai populasi dan era: sisi tindakan menggunakan "ketidakpuasan" dari survei pos Skotlandia caesar terencana/tidak terencana campuran (Porter 2007); sisi non-tindakan menggunakan "pengalaman kelahiran negatif" dari kohort prospektif nasional Swedia (Waldenström 2004). Ini adalah proksi untuk penyesalan, bukan pengukuran skala penyesalan langsung. Arah celah 19% vs 7% konsisten dengan literatur PTSD (Ginter 2022). Peringatan kunci dalam kelompok adalah bahwa caesar yang tidak direncanakan/darurat mendorong sinyal pengalaman negatif: Konheim-Kalkstein (2021) menemukan 73% penyesalan khusus di kalangan wanita dengan caesar yang tidak direncanakan — jauh lebih tinggi dari rata-rata caesar campuran 19%. Kepuasan caesar elektif terencana secara substansial lebih tinggi (~85%, Coates 2021). Delta penyesalan 0,12 mewakili kesenjangan rata-rata populasi, yang menutupi variasi subkelompok yang signifikan. Sampel Swedia Waldenström dari awal 2000-an mungkin tidak sepenuhnya mewakili pengalaman obstetrik negara berpenghasilan tinggi saat ini.

Data mentah: /api/decisions.json

Baru-baru ini dilihat di perangkat ini