本文へスキップ
Likelier

行動 vs. 不行動の後悔

仕事を辞めるか、今の会社に残るか

行動した場合

仕事を辞める

26%

行動しなかった場合

今の会社に留まる

58%

それぞれの選択を後で後悔した人の割合。バーと完全な記録は下に表示されます。


キャリア

最終確認 2026-04-26

証拠の質 4.25/5

8次元のレビュー評価。基準は 品質ルーブリック 。各次元は1〜5で評価。

D1 出典の検証
5/5
D2 出典の権威性と独立性
4/5
D3 後悔率の正確性
3/5
D4 出典の比較可能性
3/5
D5 ギロヴィッチ・パターン
5/5
D6 文章の質
5/5
D7 注意事項の完全性
5/5
D8 サンプルの質
4/5
平均 4.25/5
Two desk chairs side by side, one pushed back from an empty desk, the other tucked in with a coffee mug on the desk.

行動への後悔

仕事を辞める

26%

仕事を辞めた人の26%がその決定を後悔している

2022年に退職した米国求職者、オンラインパネル

遡及的、2022年第2-第4四半期調査

不作為への後悔

今の会社に留まる

58%

58%が、悪い仕事に長く留まりすぎたことをキャリア上の最大の後悔の一つに挙げている(辞めたことを挙げるのは38%)

米国、英国、フランス、ドイツの労働者

遡及的、2025年1月調査

この選択を後悔した割合

inaction dominates — 不作為が優勢 — 多くは行動しなかったことを後悔しています。

関連する決断

意味的に類似する決断 — 同じ領域、異なるトレードオフ。

career

転職

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が1.5倍高い

career

起業

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が5.5倍高い

career直接

昇給を求める

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が3.0倍高い

career

給与交渉

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が1.2倍高い

career

日本:終身雇用 vs. 転職

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が2.4倍高い

career直接

声を上げる

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が1.4倍高い

career

フリーランス vs 会社員

この選択を後悔した割合

行動が優勢

行動の後悔が1.3倍高い

career

昇進追求 vs 役割受容

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が1.9倍高い

Resume Now’s 2025 survey of 1,000 workers across four countries found that 58% named “staying in a bad job too long” as their biggest career regret — outranking not asking for a promotion, not speaking up, and not pursuing further education. Only 38% said quitting was their top regret. Bankrate’s 2025 Jobs & Pay Report independently corroborates the underlying dissatisfaction: 48% of workers are likely to look for a new job in the next 12 months (down from 56% in 2023, as “job hugging” takes hold in a weaker market), while 69% worry about their job security and pay raises have fallen to a multi-year low. The convergence from two independent sources strengthens the inaction-regret signal.

On the action side, Joblist surveyed over 15,000 US job seekers and found that 26% of those who quit their previous job regretted the decision. This is substantially lower than the widely cited Paychex figure of 80%, which specifically targeted Great Resignation quitters surveyed in October 2022 — a historically anomalous cohort driven by pandemic restlessness and social contagion. The Joblist sample, drawn from a broader population over a longer window, better represents normal-conditions quitting regret.

The revised framing resolves the earlier contradiction. Under normal labor conditions, quitting regret runs around 25-30% (Joblist), not 80% (Paychex). The 80% was an artifact of a specific, unusual period where many people quit impulsively into a market that cooled faster than expected. Over time, per Gilovich’s temporal pattern, quitting regret fades (the new job improves, or you quit again) while staying regret compounds (another year passes, the resume stagnates). The steady-state pattern is inaction-dominates, consistent with the broader career-regret literature.

出典: 行動

根拠台帳

以下の各数値は各出典が報告した内容であり、引用した原文の抜粋と算出方法を記載しています。リンクをクリックして直接確認できます。

1/2 件の出典が引用元と一字一句一致することを独立して検証済み

  1. [1] Joblist — Q2 2022 United States Job Market Report 検証済み
    Q2 2022 United States Job Market Report
    統計値
    26% of people who quit their previous job regret their decision
    抜粋
    “"Over one in four people who quit their previous job (26%) regret their decision." ”
    出典データ
    2022-07-15
    アクセス日
    2026-04-26
    検証
    グラウンディング監査の際、抜粋を引用元から独立して再取得し、原文と一字一句一致することを確認しました。
    計算過程
    Joblist surveyed 15,158 US job seekers; of those, 628 had quit their previous job. The 26% regret rate is measured among actual quitters (n=628). This is an independent source from Paychex and covers a broader time window than the Great Resignation-specific Paychex sample. The lower rate (26% vs Paychex's 80%) likely reflects a less sensational survey framing and a broader population beyond pandemic-era impulse quits.
  2. [2] Paychex — Employee Regret After the Great Resignation
    Employee Regret After the Great Resignation
    統計値
    80% of professionals who quit during the Great Resignation regret their decision
    抜粋
    “"Eight in 10 professionals who left their jobs regret their decision. Professionals swapping industries are 25% more likely than those who stayed within their industry to feel this way. Those who left during the Great Resignation are only 11% more likely to be satisfied with their new salaries than their previous earnings." ”
    出典データ
    2022-12-15
    アクセス日
    2026-04-26
    計算過程
    Paychex surveyed 825 employees and 354 employers in October 2022. The 80% figure specifically targets Great Resignation quitters — a historically anomalous cohort. We use the Joblist 26% as the headline rate because it is less period-specific and comes from a larger sample. The Paychex 80% represents the upper bound under unusual market conditions.

出典: 不作為

根拠台帳

以下の各数値は各出典が報告した内容であり、引用した原文の抜粋と算出方法を記載しています。リンクをクリックして直接確認できます。

1/2 件の出典が引用元と一字一句一致することを独立して検証済み

  1. [1] Resume Now — The Road Not Taken: Greatest Career Regrets Revealed 検証済み
    The Road Not Taken: Greatest Career Regrets Revealed

    See all 8 Likelier entries citing this source →

    統計値
    58% of workers say staying in a bad job too long is their biggest career regret
    抜粋
    “"58% of people say their biggest career regret is staying in a bad job too long — compared with just 38% who say they regret quitting a job. Workers regret 'job hugging' more than not speaking up in meetings, not asking for a promotion, or not getting a college degree." ”
    出典データ
    2025-01-15
    アクセス日
    2026-04-26
    検証
    グラウンディング監査の際、抜粋を引用元から独立して再取得し、原文と一字一句一致することを確認しました。
    計算過程
    Resume Now polled 1,000 workers across the US, UK, France, and Germany in January 2025. The 58% is the share naming "staying too long" as their single biggest career regret from a list of options. This is a "biggest regret" ranking, not a binary stayed/didn't-stay question, so it captures intensity rather than simple prevalence.
  2. [2] Bankrate — Bankrate's 2025 Jobs & Pay Report
    Bankrate's 2025 Jobs & Pay Report
    統計値
    48% of workers are likely to look for a new job in the next 12 months (down from 56% in 2023) amid wage stagnation and 'job hugging'
    抜粋
    “"Look for a new job": 48 percent. "Back in 2023, 56 percent of workers said they planned to look for a new job." "Less than 3 in 5 workers (57 percent) have received a pay increase over the past 12 months, the lowest share since polling began in 2022." "most workers (69 percent) say they are worried about their job security." ”
    出典データ
    2025-08-01
    アクセス日
    2026-07-01
    計算過程
    Bankrate's nationally representative survey (KnowledgePanel, probability-based). In 2025, 48% of workers are likely to look for a new job in the next 12 months — down from the 56% who planned to in 2023, a decline Bankrate attributes to "job hugging" in a weaker labor market. Intent to leave is not identical to regret about staying, but the persistent active dissatisfaction (69% worried about job security, wage stagnation at a multi-year low) corroborates the Resume Now finding that staying can breed regret. The earlier version of this entry misattributed the historical 2023 figure (56%) as the current headline; corrected to the 2025 figure (48%).

注意事項

The action and inaction figures now come from independent sources (Joblist vs Resume Now) but answer different questions: Joblist asks quitters whether they regret quitting (binary, specific), while Resume Now asks all workers what their biggest career regret is (ranking from a list, general). The 26% action-regret rate from Joblist is far lower than the Paychex 80%, reflecting the difference between a period-specific Great Resignation sample and a broader population. The 58% inaction figure is the share naming staying as their top regret among several options — not a yes/no question about their current job. Both figures inform the direction (inaction regret exceeds action regret in the long run) but the precise delta of 0.32 compares non-identical instruments. The Paychex finding remains relevant as evidence that quitting regret can spike dramatically under specific market conditions, even if it fades over time per Gilovich's temporal pattern.

生データ: /api/decisions.json

このデバイスで最近見た項目