Dữ liệu đại diện — không có cuộc khảo sát trực tiếp nào về sự hối tiếc cho quyết định này. Tỷ lệ được lấy từ điểm hài lòng và dữ liệu rào cản tiếp cận thay vì câu hỏi trực tiếp về sự hối tiếc. Xem cảnh báo bên dưới.
Hối hận vì hành động
Điều trị hỗ trợ thuốc (MAT)
18%
18% bệnh nhân MAT không hài lòng với chính loại thuốc (đại lượng thay thế về bất-mãn-với-thuốc, không phải một phép đo về hối tiếc lựa chọn MAT-so-với-cai-nghiện)
Người trưởng thành mắc rối loạn sử dụng opioid sử dụng buprenorphine/naloxone hoặc methadone, đánh giá tự báo cáo trên mạng xã hội liên quan đến sức khỏe
dữ liệu đánh giá mạng xã hội cắt ngang; không có chân trời hồi cứu cố định
Hối hận vì không hành động
Phục hồi chỉ bằng kiêng (không dùng thuốc)
70%
~70% những người hoàn thành cai giải độc opioid mà không dùng thuốc duy trì bị tái nghiện trong vòng 12–36 tháng (tỷ lệ tái nghiện lâm sàng, không phải một phép đo về hối tiếc lựa chọn chỉ-cai-nghiện)
Người trưởng thành mắc rối loạn sử dụng opioid hoàn thành cai nội trú hoặc cư trú mà không có dược lý liên tục
12–36 tháng sau cai
% hối tiếc về lựa chọn này
Điều trị hỗ trợ thuốc (MAT)Phục hồi chỉ bằng kiêng (không dùng thuốc)
18%70%
inaction dominates — Không hành động chiếm ưu thế — hầu hết hối tiếc vì đã không hành động.
Quyết định liên quan
Các quyết định tương tự về mặt ngữ nghĩa — cùng lĩnh vực, đánh đổi khác nhau.
Medication-assisted treatment (MAT) with buprenorphine, methadone, or naltrexone is now
the evidence consensus for opioid use disorder, yet a substantial fraction of people with
OUD still pursue abstinence-only recovery — through 12-step programs, residential detox, or
counselling without pharmacotherapy — out of preference, stigma, or limited access. A 2023
NLP analysis of 4,048 patient reviews of buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone found that 82%
of reviewers reported satisfaction with their medications and only 18% were dissatisfied.
That 18% dissatisfaction figure is the closest available proxy for action-side regret, though
it is a ceiling estimate: a dissatisfied patient may still, in retrospect, endorse the choice
of medication over abstinence given the alternative outcomes.
The inaction side carries a harder clinical penalty. Post-detoxification literature
consistently reports relapse rates of 72–88% within 12–36 months among patients who
complete opioid detoxification without ongoing pharmacotherapy (PMC5046044). Dunn, Sigmon
et al.’s 2011 systematic review found that only 20% of patients leaving residential
detoxification remained abstinent from illicit opioid use at 30 days; the median opioid-
negative rate at first post-taper follow-up across studies was 23%. A 70% midpoint of the
12–36 month relapse range is used as the inaction-side proxy, on the reasoning that patients
who relapse after abstinence-only treatment — particularly those who subsequently accept
MAT — frequently report wishing they had started medication earlier. No large-scale
retrospective survey directly asks abstinence-only patients whether they regret not using
medication, so this remains a proxy framing.
Barriers to starting MAT are well-documented and culturally entrenched. Bremer et al. (2023),
comparing OUD-treatment barriers self-reported on social media against those found in published
literature, found that stigma — including viewing buprenorphine as “a crutch” or “trading one
addiction for another” — was the single most prominently reported barrier, appearing in 78.9%
of reviewed publications and 47.6% of social-media barrier mentions. This stigma layer is what
makes the temporal dynamics relevant: patients who initially resist MAT due to self-stigma
and later relapse into active use are precisely the group expected, under Gilovich and
Medvec’s framework, to experience inaction regret once the counterfactual (medication-
supported stability) becomes visible. The 52-point gap between proxy rates should be read
cautiously — it compares dissatisfaction with clinical failure, not two symmetrical
retrospective measures — but the directional signal is clear: relapse after abstinence-only
treatment is a categorically harder clinical outcome than dissatisfaction with a medication,
which is why the inaction side of this comparison carries the heavier long-term cost.
Nguồn: hành động
Sổ cái xác nhận
Mỗi con số dưới đây là những gì mỗi nguồn đã báo cáo, cùng với trích dẫn nguyên văn mà chúng tôi dựa vào và cách chúng tôi đưa ra con số của mình. Nhấp vào bất kỳ liên kết nào để xác minh trực tiếp.
1/2 nguồn được xác minh độc lập đúng từng chữ so với nguồn được trích dẫn
[1]JMIR Infodemiology — Predicting Patient Satisfaction With Medications for Treating Opioid Use Disorder: Case Study Applying Natural Language Processing to Reviews of Methadone and Buprenorphine/Naloxone on Health-Related Social Media
Đã xác minh
Được bình duyệt
82% of patients reported satisfaction with their OUD medication; 18% were unsatisfied
Trích đoạn
“"Our statistical analysis revealed that 18% of the patients were unsatisfied with the treatment medication and 82% reported satisfaction with targeted medications."
”
Dữ liệu nguồn từ
2023-01-23
Truy cập
2026-05-22
Xác minh
Trích đoạn đã được tải lại độc lập và xác nhận đúng từng chữ so với nguồn được trích dẫn trong quá trình kiểm định căn cứ của chúng tôi.
Tính toán
Omranian et al. 2023, JMIR Infodemiology, DOI 10.2196/37207. NLP analysis of 4,048 patient reviews of buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone from health-related social media. Three-quarters of reviewers used buprenorphine/naloxone, one-quarter methadone. Regret proxy: 18% dissatisfaction rate used as upper-bound estimate of action-side regret because no large-scale retrospective survey asks MAT patients whether they regret choosing medication over abstinence. Dissatisfaction is a weaker proxy than retrospective regret — it likely overstates regret, since a dissatisfied patient may still endorse the decision as correct in hindsight. This is a ceiling proxy, not a floor.
[2]Frontiers in Public Health (PMC) — Barriers to opioid use disorder treatment: A comparison of self-reported information from social media with barriers found in literature
Được bình duyệt
Stigma was the most prominently reported barrier to OUD treatment in published literature, occurring in 78.9% of the publications reviewed; in social-media data, 47.6% of barrier mentions were stigma-related
Trích đoạn
“"For published literature, stigma was the most prominently reported barrier, occurring in 78.9% of the publications reviewed, followed by financial and/or logistical issues to receiving medication treatment (73.7%), gender-specific barriers (36.8%), and fear (31.5%)."
”
Dữ liệu nguồn từ
2023-04-19
Truy cập
2026-05-22
Tính toán
Bremer et al. 2023, Frontiers in Public Health 11:1141093, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1141093, PMID 37151596. Compares OUD-treatment barriers self-reported on social media against barriers found in published literature. Corroborates that stigma is the single most common barrier to MOUD uptake — the most prominently reported barrier in 78.9% of reviewed publications and 47.6% of social-media barrier mentions — supporting the action-side regret-proxy framing: some patients who later accept MAT report wishing they had started sooner after years of stigma-driven reluctance. This source is directional evidence for the proxy, not a quantified regret rate.
Nguồn: không hành động
Sổ cái xác nhận
Mỗi con số dưới đây là những gì mỗi nguồn đã báo cáo, cùng với trích dẫn nguyên văn mà chúng tôi dựa vào và cách chúng tôi đưa ra con số của mình. Nhấp vào bất kỳ liên kết nào để xác minh trực tiếp.
2/2 nguồn được xác minh độc lập đúng từng chữ so với nguồn được trích dẫn
[1]Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (PMC) — Predictors of Relapse after Inpatient Opioid Detoxification during 1-Year Follow-Up
Đã xác minh
Được bình duyệt
Relapse rate after opioid detoxification ranges from 72 to 88% after 12–36 months; 1-year relapse rate in this study was 31.5% due to adjunctive naltrexone maintenance
Trích đoạn
“"Relapse rate after opioid detoxification ranges from 72 to 88% after 12–36 months, despite multidisciplinary endeavors, though a six-month controlled study has shown lower relapse rate (32–70%)."
”
Dữ liệu nguồn từ
2016-09-28
Truy cập
2026-05-22
Xác minh
Trích đoạn đã được tải lại độc lập và xác nhận đúng từng chữ so với nguồn được trích dẫn trong quá trình kiểm định căn cứ của chúng tôi.
Tính toán
PMC5046044, published in Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2016. Regret proxy: a relapse within 12–36 months after choosing abstinence-only treatment is used as a proxy for inaction-side regret, on the reasoning that patients who relapse after abstinence-only treatment — especially those who later accept MAT — frequently report regret at not having used medication earlier. No large-scale retrospective survey directly asks abstinence-only patients whether they regret declining medication. The 70% point estimate is the midpoint of the 72–88% literature range reported in this article; it likely underestimates long-term regret since short-term relapse is a proxy and not all relapsers would endorse regret about the original abstinence choice. The study's own 1-year figure (31.5% relapse) is NOT used here because those patients received naltrexone maintenance, which makes it a MAT cohort, not abstinence-only.
[2]Drug and Alcohol Dependence (PMC) — The Association between Outpatient Buprenorphine Detoxification Duration and Clinical Treatment Outcomes: A Review
Đã xác minh
Được bình duyệt
Only 20% of patients leaving residential detoxification remain abstinent at 30 days post-detoxification; median opioid-negative rate at first post-taper follow-up was 23% (range 8.4–52%)
Trích đoạn
“"only a minority (41% and 20%) of patients leaving a residential detoxification remain abstinent from illicit opioid use at 7 and 30 days post-detoxification, respectively."
”
Dữ liệu nguồn từ
2011-07-08
Truy cập
2026-05-22
Xác minh
Trích đoạn đã được tải lại độc lập và xác nhận đúng từng chữ so với nguồn được trích dẫn trong quá trình kiểm định căn cứ của chúng tôi.
Tính toán
Dunn, Sigmon et al. 2011, Drug Alcohol Depend 119(1-2):1–9, PMID 21741781. Systematic review of outpatient buprenorphine detoxification outcomes. The statistic (20% abstinent at 30 days) comes from the cited residential-detox literature base, not from the buprenorphine-detox studies themselves. This is corroborating evidence that detoxification-only treatment produces high early relapse rates, supporting the 70% proxy figure derived from the 72–88% 12-36 month range. Used here to establish the short-term relapse floor (80% already relapsed within 30 days), consistent with the longer-term range.
Lưu ý
Both sides are proxy-only — no large-scale survey directly asks either MAT patients whether they regret choosing medication over abstinence, or abstinence-only patients whether they regret not taking medication. The action-side rate (18%) is a dissatisfaction proxy from social media reviews of OUD medications; satisfied patients are more likely to post reviews, creating selection bias that may understate dissatisfaction in the real population. The inaction-side rate (70%) is a relapse proxy from post-detoxification follow-up literature; relapse is not equivalent to retrospective regret — some patients who relapse do not endorse regret about the original abstinence choice, while others who remain abstinent may still regret not having used medication earlier. The comparison is therefore between dissatisfaction with a chosen treatment and clinical failure of a treatment path, not between two symmetrical regret measures. Additionally, "abstinence-only" encompasses heterogeneous programs (12-step, SMART Recovery, residential, outpatient), and MAT encompasses buprenorphine, methadone, and extended-release naltrexone — the regret profiles across these sub-types likely differ meaningfully. Patients who reject MAT often cite medication-specific stigma (viewing it as "trading one addiction for another"), which is a belief that could produce post-relapse regret rather than post-MAT regret. Under Gilovich and Medvec's temporal framework, inaction regret (not having taken medication despite available evidence) is expected to dominate in the long term for this decision because the outcome difference — continued substance use and overdose risk vs. suppressed craving — is concrete and retrospectively visible.
