Aller au contenu
Likelier

Regret d’agir vs. de ne pas agir

Investir en bourse tôt vs garder son argent sur des comptes d'épargne ou à terme

Si vous agissez

Investir tôt en bourse / sur les marchés

15%

Si vous n’agissez pas

Laisser son argent sur l'épargne / les dépôts à terme

48%

Pourcentage de personnes qui regrettent ensuite chaque choix. Les barres et le registre complet s’affichent ci-dessous.


Financier

Dernière révision 2026-04-26

Qualité des preuves 4.0/5

Score d’évaluation en huit dimensions selon la grille de qualité . Chaque dimension notée de 1 à 5.

D1 Vérification des sources
3/5
D2 Autorité et indépendance des sources
4/5
D3 Précision du taux de regret
3/5
D4 Comparabilité des sources
3/5
D5 Motif de Gilovich
5/5
D6 Qualité de la prose
5/5
D7 Complétude des réserves
5/5
D8 Qualité de l’échantillon
4/5
Moyenne 4.0/5
Two hourglasses side by side, one with coins flowing through, the other with coins stuck at the top.

Regret d'action

Investir tôt en bourse / sur les marchés

15%

~15% des investisseurs regrettent un mouvement actif sur le marché (être sortis)

Adultes américains qui investissent, panel en ligne

rétrospective, l'année passée

Regret d'inaction

Laisser son argent sur l'épargne / les dépôts à terme

48%

48% disent qu'ils auraient dû commencer à épargner/investir plus tôt pour la retraite

Adultes américains, panel en ligne

rétrospective, pas de calendrier fixe

% regrettent ce choix

inaction dominates — L'inaction domine — la plupart regrettent de ne pas avoir agi.

Décisions associées

Décisions sémantiquement similaires — même terrain, compromis différents.

Financier

Investissement

% regrettent ce choix

L'inaction domine

Regret d'inaction 3.2× plus élevé

FinancierDirecte

Épargne retraite

% regrettent ce choix

L'inaction domine

Regret d'inaction 11.0× plus élevé

Financier

Crypto vs. investissement traditionnel

% regrettent ce choix

L'action domine

Regret d'action 2.9× plus élevé

FinancierDirecte

Achat immobilier

% regrettent ce choix

L'inaction domine

Regret d'inaction 5.6× plus élevé

lifestyle

Dépenses de voyage

% regrettent ce choix

L'inaction domine

Regret d'inaction 11.8× plus élevé

Financier

Dettes étudiantes vs. voie moins chère

% regrettent ce choix

L'inaction domine

Regret d'inaction 1.3× plus élevé

Financier

Don pour apport immobilier vs. protéger son

% regrettent ce choix

L'inaction domine

Regret d'inaction 2.3× plus élevé

Financier

Négociation du loyer

% regrettent ce choix

L'inaction domine

Regret d'inaction 1.9× plus élevé

A Clarify Capital survey of 1,000 adults named “not investing earlier in life” as the single biggest financial regret Americans report, and found that nearly half (48%) said they should have started saving for retirement earlier. Respondents estimated their net worth would be $40,000 higher today had they started sooner — and one in three put the figure at $100,000 or more. On the action side, regret about having invested is far rarer and is not directly surveyed: the closest cited measure comes from MagnifyMoney/CNBC, where 38% of investors pulled money out during volatility and 40% of that group regret it — roughly 15% of investors who took an active market move they wish they hadn’t. Bankrate’s own biggest-financial-regret menu (retirement 22%, emergency savings 18%, credit card debt 14%) contains no investment-loss category at all, underscoring how far action-type investing regret sits below the inaction regrets.

The mechanism is compound interest working in reverse as a regret amplifier. A 25-year-old who puts $10,000 into an S&P 500 index fund and leaves it for 30 years at the historical ~10% nominal return ends up with roughly $175,000; the same person waiting until 35 ends up with ~$67,000 — a gap that exists entirely because of the ten lost years, not because of any difference in skill or risk tolerance. Börsch-Supan et al. (2023) confirmed this pattern with peer-reviewed rigor: surveying US adults aged 60-79, they found 58.5% affirm saving regret — the wish to have saved more earlier. Notably, their analysis found that life shocks (unemployment, health crises, divorce) explained more of the variation than procrastination or psychological traits, suggesting that saving regret is partly driven by circumstance rather than pure inaction bias.

The caveat is regime dependence. These surveys were fielded during or shortly after a 13-year US equity bull run in which the S&P 500 returned roughly 15% annualized. Someone who invested early in Japan’s Nikkei in 1989 waited over 30 years to break even; someone who bought US equities in March 2000 was underwater for a decade. The 48% inaction-regret figure is partly a product of hindsight bias magnified by a historically favorable period. In a high-interest-rate environment — such as 2023-2024, when US savings accounts and CDs offered 5%+ — the gap between “invest early” and “keep in term deposits” narrows considerably. The directional finding (timing regret favors starting early) is robust across most long horizons; the magnitude is era-dependent and should not be read as a universal constant.

Sources : action

Registre des sources

Chaque chiffre ci-dessous correspond à ce que la source a rapporté, avec la citation textuelle sur laquelle nous nous sommes appuyés et la méthode de calcul. Cliquez sur un lien pour vérifier directement.

  1. [1] CNBC / MagnifyMoney — Nearly 40% of investors who pulled money out of markets in the last year regret it
    Nearly 40% of investors who pulled money out of markets in the last year regret it
    Statistique
    38% of investors pulled money from the stock market due to current events; of those, 40% wish they had stayed invested (≈15% of investors)
    Extrait
    “"38 percent of investors said they sold stocks last year due to a current event, and of that group, 40 percent said they wish they'd kept their money invested." ”
    Données source de
    2022-05-16
    Consulté le
    2026-04-26
    Calcul
    MagnifyMoney/CNBC: 38% of investors pulled money out of the market due to current events, and 40% of that group now regret it. That implies roughly 0.38 × 0.40 ≈ 15% of investors took an active market move they regret. We use this ≈15% as the action-regret rate, because among people who acted on their investments the regret overwhelmingly runs toward wishing they had stayed in the market — not toward wishing they had never invested. The predominant action-regret is about exiting, not entering; no reached survey reports a clean "regret investing early" rate, so this exit-regret figure is the closest cited action-regret measure.
  2. [2] Bankrate — Survey: 2 In 5 Americans Regret Not Saving Enough For Retirement Or Emergencies
    Survey: 2 In 5 Americans Regret Not Saving Enough For Retirement Or Emergencies
    Statistique
    Bankrate's biggest-financial-regret menu is led by inaction-type regrets (retirement 22%, emergencies 18%, credit card debt 14%); investment losses are not among the top listed categories
    Extrait
    “"22% of Americans said not saving for retirement early enough is their top financial regret. 18% of Americans said they regretted not socking away enough money to cover emergency expenses. Other financial regrets included incurring too much credit card debt (14%) and buying more house than they could afford (2%)." ”
    Données source de
    2024-08-20
    Consulté le
    2026-04-26
    Calcul
    Bankrate commissioned YouGov to survey US adults in July 2024, nationally representative via non-probability sample with quotas. The top financial regrets are retirement saving (22%), emergency savings (18%), and credit card debt (14%) — all inaction-type regrets. "Investment losses" or "poor investment decisions" is not a listed top category, which is context that action-side (regret-having-invested) rates are low; Bankrate does not itself supply the action rate.

Sources : inaction

Registre des sources

Chaque chiffre ci-dessous correspond à ce que la source a rapporté, avec la citation textuelle sur laquelle nous nous sommes appuyés et la méthode de calcul. Cliquez sur un lien pour vérifier directement.

1/3 sources vérifiées de manière indépendante, mot pour mot, par rapport à la source citée

  1. [1] Clarify Capital — The Financial Regrets Report: What Americans Wish They Did Differently
    The Financial Regrets Report: What Americans Wish They Did Differently

    See all 2 Likelier entries citing this source →

    Statistique
    Nearly half (48%) of Americans say they should have started saving for retirement earlier; not investing earlier in life ranked as the single biggest financial regret, with respondents estimating $40,000 higher net worth had they started sooner
    Extrait
    “"Americans' biggest financial regrets were not investing earlier in life, overspending, and taking on too much debt. On average, they estimated their net worth would be $40,000 higher today if they had avoided their biggest financial mistake, while 1 in 3 believed they'd have $100,000 more in their accounts. Retirement accounts topped the list of investments Americans regretted not making sooner. Nearly half (48%) said they should have started saving earlier, including 56% of Gen X, 51% of baby boomers, and 35% of Gen Z." ”
    Données source de
    2023-06-15
    Consulté le
    2026-04-26
    Calcul
    Clarify Capital surveyed 1,000 Americans (average age 41). The survey names "not investing earlier in life" as the top-ranked biggest financial regret but attaches no single headline percentage to that rank; the closest stated figure for the timing dimension is that "nearly half (48%) said they should have started saving earlier" for retirement. We use that verbatim 48% as the inaction-regret rate. The $40K net-worth gap (and 1 in 3 estimating $100,000 more) is self-estimated and likely conservative for those who kept money in term deposits during a prolonged equity bull market. Verified against the archived snapshot (web.archive.org/web/20250607215536).
  2. [2] Bankrate — Survey: 2 In 5 Americans Regret Not Saving Enough For Retirement Or Emergencies
    Survey: 2 In 5 Americans Regret Not Saving Enough For Retirement Or Emergencies
    Statistique
    22% of Americans say not saving for retirement early enough is their No. 1 financial regret — the top regret for six of seven years Bankrate has tracked it
    Extrait
    “"Not saving for retirement early enough has been the No. 1 regret among Americans for six out of the seven years Bankrate has asked about financial regrets. 22 percent cited it as their top regret in 2024. Only 15 percent of people with a financial regret have made significant progress on it in the last 12 months." ”
    Données source de
    2024-08-20
    Consulté le
    2026-04-26
    Calcul
    Bankrate's 22% figure uses a different framing — "not saving for retirement early enough" — which captures the same timing regret but in a broader financial-regret menu. The lower figure reflects competition with other regret categories (debt, emergencies), not weaker sentiment. The persistence across seven annual surveys confirms this is not a one-year anomaly.
  3. [3] Journal of Economic Psychology / Börsch-Supan, Bucher-Koenen, Hurd & Rohwedder — Saving regret and procrastination Vérifié
    Saving regret and procrastination

    See all 3 Likelier entries citing this source →

    Statistique
    58% of US adults aged 60-79 affirm saving regret — the wish in hindsight to have saved more earlier in life
    Extrait
    “"We defined saving regret as the wish in hindsight to have saved more earlier in life, and measured this along with possible determinants in a survey of U.S. households where respondents were aged 60–79. We found high levels of saving regret: approximately 58% of respondents affirmed it. Married, older, healthier and wealthier respondents were less likely to report saving regret." ”
    Données source de
    2023-02-01
    Consulté le
    2026-04-26
    Vérification
    Extrait récupéré et confirmé de manière indépendante, mot pour mot, par rapport à la source citée lors de notre audit de vérification.
    Calcul
    Börsch-Supan et al. (2023), Journal of Economic Psychology 94. Peer-reviewed study using a nationally representative US sample of adults aged 60-79. The paper's preferred estimate is 58.5%; its abstract states "approximately 58% of respondents affirmed it." This corroborates the survey-based timing-regret findings (Clarify Capital 48%, Bankrate 22%) with a stronger methodology. The higher rate likely reflects that older adults have more hindsight and larger realized opportunity costs. Shocks (unemployment, health, divorce) explained more variation than procrastination, suggesting saving regret is partly driven by life events rather than pure inaction bias.

Réserves

Le taux d'inaction de 48% (Clarify Capital) et le taux d'action de ~15% (MagnifyMoney/CNBC) proviennent d'enquêtes différentes avec des structures de questions différentes, et mesurent des construits liés mais non identiques. L'enquête Clarify Capital a désigné « ne pas avoir investi plus tôt dans la vie » comme le plus grand regret financier le plus cité, mais n'a attaché aucun pourcentage phare à ce rang ; le 48% que nous utilisons est son chiffre de timing le plus proche cité — « près de la moitié (48%) a dit qu'elle aurait dû commencer à épargner plus tôt » pour la retraite — de sorte que le taux d'inaction est un regret sur le moment d'épargner/investir, pas strictement un taux de « j'aurais aimé investir en bourse ». Le chiffre d'action de ~15% est dérivé du regret de sortie (38% des investisseurs ont vendu pendant la volatilité et 40% d'entre eux le regrettent), car aucune enquête consultée ne rapporte un taux net de « regret d'avoir investi tôt » — le regret d'avoir investi n'est pas mesuré directement, et le menu de regrets de Bankrate (retraite 22%, urgences 18%, dette de carte de crédit 14%) ne contient aucune catégorie de pertes d'investissement. L'écart de valeur nette de 40 000 $ est auto-estimé, pas actuariellement calculé — les gens s'ancrent sur des nombres ronds et peuvent surestimer ou sous-estimer le vrai coût d'opportunité. Les trois enquêtes d'inaction ont été menées pendant ou peu après un marché haussier d'actions américain historiquement fort (2009-2022, S&P 500 ~15% annualisé). Dans un marché baissier prolongé ou un régime de stagnation (Japon post-1989, États-Unis 2000-2010), le regret d'inaction serait significativement plus bas et le regret d'action plus élevé. Les détenteurs de dépôts à terme dans des environnements à intérêts élevés (par exemple, taux de 5%+ en 2023-2024) peuvent avoir moins de regret que ces enquêtes ne le suggèrent. La conclusion évaluée par les pairs de Börsch-Supan et al. (58% de regret d'épargne chez les 60-79 ans) confirme le schéma directionnel avec une méthodologie plus forte mais montre également que les chocs de vie, pas seulement la procrastination, conduisent une grande partie de la variation. Le delta de 0,33 est modéré et dépendant du régime. Les données d'enquête sont tirées exclusivement d'échantillons des États-Unis ; les taux de satisfaction et de regret dans les pays avec des structures institutionnelles différentes — marchés financiers, structures de comptes à avantages fiscaux et régimes de gains en capital — peuvent différer substantiellement.

Données brutes : /api/decisions.json

Récemment consultés sur cet appareil