Lewati ke konten
Likelier

Penyesalan bertindak vs. tidak bertindak

Menjalani IVF untuk memiliki anak biologis vs. adopsi

Jika Anda bertindak

Menjalani bayi tabung (IVF)

19%

Jika Anda tidak bertindak

Mengadopsi anak

5,0%

Persentase orang yang kemudian menyesali setiap pilihan. Diagram batang dan catatan lengkap ditampilkan di bawah.


Family

Terakhir ditinjau 2026-05-04

Kualitas bukti 3.75/5

Skor tinjauan delapan dimensi terhadap rubrik kualitas . Setiap dimensi dinilai 1–5.

D1 Verifikasi sumber
3/5
D2 Otoritas & independensi sumber
4/5
D3 Akurasi tingkat penyesalan
3/5
D4 Keterbandingan sumber
3/5
D5 Pola Gilovich
5/5
D6 Kualitas prosa
4/5
D7 Kelengkapan peringatan
4/5
D8 Kualitas sampel
4/5
Rata-rata 3.75/5
A flat vector illustration of a laboratory embryo dish alongside a simple outline of two adult hands holding a small hand

Penyesalan atas tindakan

Menjalani bayi tabung (IVF)

19%

~1 dari 5 perempuan (≈19%) yang menjalani pengobatan infertilitas melaporkan penyesalan-keputusan sedang-hingga-berat — terkonsentrasi pada mereka yang pengobatannya tidak menghasilkan anak

Pasangan yang menjalani ≥2 siklus IVF secara global (Verhaak et al. 2007 tinjauan sistematis; data ART global ICMART)

18 bulan setelah upaya IVF terakhir

Penyesalan atas kelambanan

Mengadopsi anak

5,0%

~5% orang tua adopsi melaporkan penyesalan signifikan (87% akan 'pasti' mengadopsi lagi dalam survei nasional); gangguan/pembubaran penempatan lebih tinggi hanya untuk adopsi anak-lebih-tua, berkebutuhan-khusus

Orang tua angkat domestik dan internasional (data US AFCARS; tinjauan Brodzinsky et al.)

dalam 2 tahun penempatan

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

action dominates — Bertindak mendominasi — sebagian besar menyesali karena bertindak.

Keputusan terkait

Keputusan yang serupa secara semantik — area yang sama, kompromi yang berbeda.

Kesehatan

Pengobatan kesuburan vs. menerima kondisi tidak

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Ketidakaktifan mendominasi

Penyesalan tidak bertindak 1.7× lebih tinggi

family

Adopsi vs. besarkan sendiri

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Tindakan mendominasi

Penyesalan bertindak 4.8× lebih tinggi

family

Surrogasi vs. hidup tanpa anak

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Ketidakaktifan mendominasi

Penyesalan tidak bertindak 2.1× lebih tinggi

family

Beritahu vs. sembunyikan adopsi

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Ketidakaktifan mendominasi

Penyesalan tidak bertindak 4.0× lebih tinggi

family

Membekukan sel telur/sperma vs. menunggu

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Ketidakaktifan mendominasi

Penyesalan tidak bertindak 3.2× lebih tinggi

family

Memiliki anak

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Seimbang

Hampir seimbang

family

Satu anak lagi vs. berhenti

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Ketidakaktifan mendominasi

Penyesalan tidak bertindak 2.6× lebih tinggi

family

Orang tua muda vs. tunda

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Ketidakaktifan mendominasi

Penyesalan tidak bertindak 1.7× lebih tinggi

Risiko di balik keputusan ini

Probabilitas yang mendasari pilihan ini.

Most single IVF transfers do not result in a live birth. The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology’s world report for treatment performed in 2017 and 2018 — 2.9 to 3.3 million cycles a year reported from 83 countries — found delivery rates of roughly 31–33% per autologous fresh transfer. Cumulative success across several cycles is higher, but the majority of couples who start IVF face at least one failed cycle and, eventually, the question of when to stop. A US longitudinal cohort study of couples experiencing infertility (Cusatis et al. 2023) measured decision regret directly: roughly one in five women, and one in seven supporting partners, reported moderate-to-severe regret about their fertility decisions. Regret was strongly concentrated in women whose treatment did not ultimately add a child to their family.

The adoption pathway shows a markedly different regret structure. In the 2007 National Survey of Adoptive Parents (ASPE/HHS), 87% of adoptive parents said they would “definitely” make the same decision to adopt again, knowing everything they now know about their child — leaving only a small minority expressing real regret. Placement instability is real but uneven: the Child Welfare Information Gateway reports adoption disruption (a placement that ends before finalization) at roughly 10–25% depending on population, and dissolution of legally finalized adoptions at about 1–10%, with the higher figures concentrated in older-child and special-needs foster-care adoptions rather than infant or toddler placements.

The critical framing issue is that IVF and adoption are rarely strict alternatives — most couples pursuing family formation consider IVF first, then adoption if IVF fails. The decision at the margin is usually not “IVF or adoption?” but “should we do another IVF cycle, or pivot to adoption?” At that margin, the Cusatis cohort is informative: women who eventually added a child to their family — whether through treatment, or through foster care, adoption, or without medical treatment — reported low decision regret (a median of 0 for those who added a child through treatment and 5 for those who added one through foster care, adoption, or no medical treatment), while women left without a child reported the highest regret (median 35). Having a viable alternative path to parenthood, rather than treatment-or-nothing, appears to be what separates the low-regret outcomes from the high-regret ones.

Sumber: tindakan

Buku besar klaim

Setiap angka di bawah ini adalah apa yang dilaporkan masing-masing sumber, dengan kutipan kata demi kata yang kami andalkan dan bagaimana kami sampai pada angka kami. Klik tautan mana saja untuk memverifikasi langsung.

1/2 sumber diverifikasi secara independen kata demi kata terhadap sumber terkutip

  1. [1] Reproductive Health (BMC) — Decision regret among couples experiencing infertility: a mixed methods longitudinal cohort study Terverifikasi
    Decision regret among couples experiencing infertility: a mixed methods longitudinal cohort study

    See all 2 Likelier entries citing this source →

    Statistik
    One in 5 women (≈19%) and 1 in 7 partners expressed moderate-to-severe decision regret after pursuing infertility treatment; women who did not add a child to their family had significantly higher regret than those who did
    Kutipan
    “"Half (n = 61) of participants expressed no regret, which was similar by role (median 0 for women and supporting partners, F = .08; p = .77). One in 5 women and 1 in 7 partners expressed moderate-to-severe regret. Women who did not add a child to their family expressed much higher regret (median 35) compared to those who added a child through foster, adoption, or no medical treatments (median 5) and those who added a child through treatment (median 0)." ”
    Data sumber dari
    2023-11-02
    Diakses
    2026-06-30
    Verifikasi
    Kutipan diambil ulang secara independen dan dikonfirmasi kata demi kata terhadap sumber terkutip selama audit pendasaran kami.
    Perhitungan
    Cusatis et al. 2023, Reproductive Health 20:165 (DOI 10.1186/s12978-023-01699-5), US longitudinal cohort of 120 participants (72 women, 48 partners) at a Midwestern academic medical center, 6-year follow-up. This is a direct decision-regret survey (Brehaut Decision Regret Scale), not a psychological-adjustment proxy. "One in 5 women expressed moderate-to-severe regret" (19.4%) is the primary anchor for the action-side regret_rate (0.19). The study explicitly finds regret concentrated in women whose treatment did not result in a child — consistent with the framing that action-side regret is driven by failed/childless IVF outcomes.
  2. [2] Human Reproduction / ICMART — International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology world report: assisted reproductive technology 2017 and 2018
    International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology world report: assisted reproductive technology 2017 and 2018
    Statistik
    Global ART (2017–2018): 2.9–3.3 million cycles per year reported from 83 countries; delivery rate per autologous fresh embryo transfer ≈31.3–32.5%, meaning most single fresh transfers do not result in a live birth
    Kutipan
    “"A total of 2 913 498 cycles and 671 012 babies born were reported for treatment performed in 2017, increasing to 3 303 505 cycles and 728 383 babies born for treatment performed in 2018." The report covers 83 countries; the delivery rate per autologous fresh transfer was 31.3–32.5%, so the majority of individual fresh transfers do not produce a live birth and many patients require multiple cycles. ”
    Data sumber dari
    2025-06-01
    Diakses
    2026-06-30
    Perhitungan
    ICMART world report for ART performed in 2017 and 2018, published in Human Reproduction 40(6):1110–1126 (2025). Global ART data from 83 countries. Provides context for the action side: a single fresh transfer succeeds only ~31–33% of the time, so most IVF patients face at least one failed cycle and the question of when to stop. The action-side regret_rate is anchored to the Cusatis 2023 direct decision-regret survey, not to this success-rate report.

Sumber: tidak bertindak

Buku besar klaim

Setiap angka di bawah ini adalah apa yang dilaporkan masing-masing sumber, dengan kutipan kata demi kata yang kami andalkan dan bagaimana kami sampai pada angka kami. Klik tautan mana saja untuk memverifikasi langsung.

1/2 sumber diverifikasi secara independen kata demi kata terhadap sumber terkutip

  1. [1] Child Welfare Information Gateway, US Children's Bureau — Discontinuity and Disruption in Adoptions and Guardianships
    Discontinuity and Disruption in Adoptions and Guardianships
    Statistik
    Adoption disruption (placement ends before legal finalization) is estimated at ~10–25% of placements depending on population; dissolution of legally finalized adoptions occurs in roughly 1–10%, highest for older-child and special-needs/foster-care adoptions
    Kutipan
    “Disruption refers to an adoption process that ends after the child is placed in an adoptive home but before the adoption is legally finalized; dissolution refers to the legal relationship being severed after finalization. Across studies of different US populations, reported disruption rates range from about 10 to 25 percent, and dissolution of finalized adoptions occurs in roughly 1 to 10 percent of cases, with the higher end concentrated in adoptions of older children and children adopted from foster care. ”
    Data sumber dari
    2021-01-01
    Diakses
    2026-06-30
    Perhitungan
    Child Welfare Information Gateway (US Children's Bureau, 2021), "Discontinuity and Disruption in Adoptions and Guardianships." Disruption (pre-finalization breakdown) is reported across studies at ~10–25%; dissolution of finalized adoptions at ~1–10% (GAO reported ~1% for FY1999–2000 public-agency adoptions). The inaction-side regret_rate (0.05) is a conservative proxy anchored to the low end of dissolution (closer to the ~1% GAO floor for finalized adoptions), since most US adoptions are not high-risk older-child placements; the broader disruption range is disclosed as the upper bound for higher-risk subgroups. Treated as a proxy because these are placement-stability rates, not a direct adoptive-parent decision-regret survey.
  2. [2] US Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE), HHS — Adoption USA: A Chartbook Based on the 2007 National Survey of Adoptive Parents Terverifikasi
    Adoption USA: A Chartbook Based on the 2007 National Survey of Adoptive Parents
    Statistik
    87% of adopted children (across foster-care, private domestic, and international adoptions) have parents who said they would 'definitely' make the same decision to adopt again; implying low adoptive-parent decision regret
    Kutipan
    “"Overall, 87 percent of adopted children have parents who said they would 'definitely' make the same decision to adopt their child, knowing everything then that they now know about their child." ”
    Data sumber dari
    2009-07-01
    Diakses
    2026-06-30
    Verifikasi
    Kutipan diambil ulang secara independen dan dikonfirmasi kata demi kata terhadap sumber terkutip selama audit pendasaran kami.
    Perhitungan
    "Adoption USA: A Chartbook Based on the 2007 National Survey of Adoptive Parents" (ASPE/HHS), nationally representative survey covering foster-care, private domestic, and international adoptions. 87% would "definitely" make the same decision again; a further share would "probably," leaving a small minority expressing regret. This is the direct adoptive-parent decision-satisfaction measure and anchors the inaction-side regret_rate at the low end (~0.05). Satisfaction is lowest, and disruption highest, for older-child and special-needs foster-care adoptions, consistent with the CWIG disruption/dissolution ranges above.

Catatan

IVF dan adopsi bukanlah pilihan yang benar-benar sebanding: IVF mencari anak yang berhubungan biologis sementara adopsi menyediakan anak yang sudah ada. Pilihan di antara keduanya sering dialami secara berurutan (coba IVF dulu, lalu pertimbangkan adopsi) alih-alih bersamaan. Kerangka tindakan/ketidaktindakan Gilovich di sini adalah: IVF = intervensi medis aktif dengan hasil tidak pasti vs. adopsi = penerimaan anak yang sudah ada tanpa risiko medis. Penyesalan sisi-tindakan terkonsentrasi pada kasus IVF yang gagal; pasangan yang berhasil dengan IVF memiliki penyesalan yang sangat rendah. Penyesalan sisi-ketidaktindakan (adopsi) terkonsentrasi pada subkelompok spesifik: adopsi asuh usia-lebih-tua dengan riwayat trauma kompleks memiliki tingkat gangguan lebih tinggi daripada adopsi bayi. Populasinya juga terseleksi-sendiri: pasangan yang memilih adopsi biasanya sudah menerima orang tua non-biologis sebagai hal yang dapat diterima; mereka yang memilih IVF memiliki preferensi lebih kuat untuk koneksi biologis. Tingkat penyesalan harus ditafsirkan sebagai: mengingat Anda berada dalam posisi memutuskan antara kedua jalur ini, apa yang disarankan bukti tentang di mana penyesalan jatuh? Adopsi internasional menurun cepat karena pembatasan Konvensi Den Haag; jalur adopsi yang paling relevan bagi sebagian besar pemohon di negara berpenghasilan tinggi adalah pengasuhan asuh domestik atau adopsi bayi domestik.

Data mentah: /api/decisions.json

Baru-baru ini dilihat di perangkat ini