Aller au contenu
Likelier

Regret d’agir vs. de ne pas agir

Accouchement par césarienne ou par voie vaginale

Si vous agissez

Accouchement par césarienne

19%

Si vous n’agissez pas

Accouchement par voie basse

7,0%

Pourcentage de personnes qui regrettent ensuite chaque choix. Les barres et le registre complet s’affichent ci-dessous.


Famille

Dernière révision 2026-05-04

Qualité des preuves 4.38/5

Score d’évaluation en huit dimensions selon la grille de qualité . Chaque dimension notée de 1 à 5.

D1 Vérification des sources
5/5
D2 Autorité et indépendance des sources
4/5
D3 Précision du taux de regret
3/5
D4 Comparabilité des sources
3/5
D5 Motif de Gilovich
5/5
D6 Qualité de la prose
5/5
D7 Complétude des réserves
5/5
D8 Qualité de l’échantillon
5/5
Moyenne 4.38/5
Two abstract door-like shapes side by side, one clinical and angular, one organic and rounded, flat vector in muted tones.

Regret d'action

Accouchement par césarienne

19%

19% des femmes ayant accouché par césarienne étaient insatisfaites de l'expérience de naissance (proxy d'insatisfaction)

Femmes ayant accouché par césarienne en Écosse, recrutées par enquête postale (mélange planifié et non planifié)

rétrospective, durée variable depuis l'accouchement

Regret d'inaction

Accouchement par voie basse

7,0%

7% des femmes ont eu une expérience de naissance négative à 1 an post-partum (proxy d'expérience négative)

Femmes suédoises recrutées dans toutes les cliniques anténatales au niveau national, évaluées 1 an après l'accouchement (majoritairement des naissances vaginales étant donné le taux national de césariennes de ~15%)

1 an après l'accouchement

% regrettent ce choix

action dominates — L'action domine — la plupart regrettent d'avoir agi.

Décisions associées

Décisions sémantiquement similaires — même terrain, compromis différents.

family

Adoption vs élever soi-même

% regrettent ce choix

L'action domine

Regret d'action 4.8× plus élevé

family

Sein vs biberon

% regrettent ce choix

L'inaction domine

Regret d'inaction 4.5× plus élevé

family

Avoir des enfants

% regrettent ce choix

Équilibré

À peu près équilibré

SantéDirecte

Décision d'avortement

% regrettent ce choix

Équilibré

À peu près équilibré

Santé

Ligature des trompes

% regrettent ce choix

L'action domine

Regret d'action 1.4× plus élevé

family

Parentalité précoce vs tardive

% regrettent ce choix

L'inaction domine

Regret d'inaction 1.7× plus élevé

family

Parent au foyer vs actif

% regrettent ce choix

L'action domine

Regret d'action 1.3× plus élevé

family

Médiation familiale vs. contentieux

% regrettent ce choix

L'inaction domine

Regret d'inaction 3.1× plus élevé

Cesarean delivery carries roughly three times the negative-experience rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery across the available survey and outcomes literature: 19% of cesarean-delivery women in a large Scottish postal study reported dissatisfaction with their birth (Porter et al. 2007, n=1,661), compared to 7% of women in a national Swedish cohort who rated their birth — predominantly vaginal — as a negative experience one year later (Waldenström et al. 2004, n=2,541). The PTSD literature corroborates the direction: spontaneous vaginal birth produces the lowest postpartum PTSD rates of any delivery mode (1.8% at 6+ months, Ginter 2022 integrative review), while emergency cesarean sits at the top (4.8%), with elective cesarean and instrumental vaginal between them.

The critical within-group caveat is that unplanned cesareans drive most of the negative signal. Konheim-Kalkstein & Miron-Shatz (2021) found 73% regret among 227 US women with unplanned cesareans as their only birth — but the regret was predominantly inaction-flavored, centering on not having advocated for themselves during labor, rather than regretting the surgical procedure itself. Women who chose a planned elective cesarean fared far better: Coates et al. (2021) found 85% were satisfied with their decision-making process. The 19% average action-side rate masks wide within-group variation: planned/elective cesarean carries markedly less dissatisfaction than unplanned cesarean, where Konheim-Kalkstein & Miron-Shatz found 73% regret — depending almost entirely on whether the procedure was chosen or imposed by circumstances.

The direction is consistent with the Gilovich inaction-versus-action pattern: the shorter-term satisfaction advantage of elective cesarean (control, predictability, pain management) reflects known short-horizon benefits, while the negative-experience and PTSD data above suggest the psychological costs of operative delivery are what compound rather than fade. Long-term, decade-scale survey data directly comparing fulfillment or regret by delivery mode remains sparse in the literature — an evidence gap rather than a null finding. The absence of direct “regret about not having a cesarean” survey data from vaginal-delivery populations is itself informative: the construct is rarely studied because the experience is relatively rarely reported.

Sources : action

Registre des sources

Chaque chiffre ci-dessous correspond à ce que la source a rapporté, avec la citation textuelle sur laquelle nous nous sommes appuyés et la méthode de calcul. Cliquez sur un lien pour vérifier directement.

3/3 sources vérifiées de manière indépendante, mot pour mot, par rapport à la source citée

  1. [1] Birth / Porter, van Teijlingen, Yip & Bhattacharya — Satisfaction with cesarean section: qualitative analysis of open-ended questions in a large postal survey Vérifié
    Satisfaction with cesarean section: qualitative analysis of open-ended questions in a large postal survey
    Statistique
    81% of cesarean-delivery women were satisfied with the birth experience; 19% were not satisfied
    Extrait
    “"Eighty-one percent of women were satisfied with the experience. Thirty-six percent rated at least one aspect of their caesarean section as distressing. Forty-two percent provided written descriptions of distressing experiences, of which 66% described psychological or communication-related issues." ”
    Données source de
    2007-06-01
    Consulté le
    2026-05-04
    Vérification
    Extrait récupéré et confirmé de manière indépendante, mot pour mot, par rapport à la source citée lors de notre audit de vérification.
    Calcul
    Porter et al. (2007) conducted a postal survey of all women in Grampian, Scotland who delivered by cesarean in a 2-year period; 1,661 responded (75% response rate). Satisfaction item was binary; 81% reported satisfied, leaving 19% as the dissatisfied/negative-experience proportion used as the regret proxy. Mixed planned and unplanned cesareans; emergency cesarean carries substantially higher dissatisfaction rates (see Konheim-Kalkstein below for unplanned-only data). The 19% figure is the primary action-side rate because it covers the full cesarian population, not only emergency cases.
    Indépendance
    Population-based postal survey in Scotland; independent of the US-based Konheim-Kalkstein study below.
  2. [2] Journal of Health Psychology / Konheim-Kalkstein & Miron-Shatz — 'If only I had . . .': Regrets from women with an unplanned cesarean delivery Vérifié
    'If only I had . . .': Regrets from women with an unplanned cesarean delivery
    Statistique
    73% of women with unplanned cesarean as their only birth reported regret; regret centered on inaction, particularly not advocating for the self
    Extrait
    “"Seventy-three percent of women reported regret which mostly centered on inaction, particularly not advocating for the self. Those with regrets reported lower birth satisfaction (t(220) = 4.84, p < .001). Only emotional support was associated with lower likelihood of experiencing regret (p < .001)." ”
    Données source de
    2019-12-03
    Consulté le
    2026-05-04
    Vérification
    Extrait récupéré et confirmé de manière indépendante, mot pour mot, par rapport à la source citée lors de notre audit de vérification.
    Calcul
    Konheim-Kalkstein & Miron-Shatz (2021) surveyed 227 US women with unplanned cesarean as their only birth. The 73% regret rate is specific to unplanned cesareans; the regret was predominantly inaction-flavored (wishing they had advocated for themselves differently, not necessarily regretting the surgical procedure per se). This rate is cited as secondary context for within-group variation — emergency/unplanned cesareans carry a far higher regret burden than the 19% mixed-sample figure. The action-side regret_rate uses 0.19 (Porter 2007) as the more representative overall population figure.
    Indépendance
    Separate US online survey study; independent of Porter's Scottish postal survey in population, country, timing, and methodology.
  3. [3] Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology / Coates, Donnolley, Thirukumar, Lainchbury, Spear & Henry — Women's experiences of decision-making and beliefs in relation to planned caesarean section: A survey study Vérifié
    Women's experiences of decision-making and beliefs in relation to planned caesarean section: A survey study
    Statistique
    85% of women were satisfied with the decision-making process for a planned cesarean section, regardless of whether the CS was perceived as requested or recommended
    Extrait
    “"The majority (85%) of women appeared satisfied with the decision-making process, regardless of whether they perceived their CS as requested or recommended." ”
    Données source de
    2021-02-01
    Consulté le
    2026-07-03
    Vérification
    Extrait récupéré et confirmé de manière indépendante, mot pour mot, par rapport à la source citée lors de notre audit de vérification.
    Calcul
    Coates, Donnolley, Thirukumar, Lainchbury, Spear & Henry (2021), Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 61(1):106-115 (published online 2020-09-22). PMID 32964450. Survey of women who had a planned (elective) cesarean section specifically. Cited as within-group context: the 19% dissatisfaction figure used as the primary action-side regret proxy (Porter 2007) mixes planned and unplanned cesareans; this source shows planned/elective cesarean alone carries much higher decision satisfaction (85%) than the mixed sample, corroborating the caveat that regret concentrates in unplanned/emergency cesareans. Not used in regret_rate arithmetic.
    Indépendance
    Australian survey study; independent of Porter (Scotland), Konheim-Kalkstein (US), and Waldenström (Sweden) in population, country, and methodology.

Sources : inaction

Registre des sources

Chaque chiffre ci-dessous correspond à ce que la source a rapporté, avec la citation textuelle sur laquelle nous nous sommes appuyés et la méthode de calcul. Cliquez sur un lien pour vérifier directement.

1/2 sources vérifiées de manière indépendante, mot pour mot, par rapport à la source citée

  1. [1] Birth / Waldenström, Hildingsson, Rubertsson & Rådestad — A Negative Birth Experience: Prevalence and Risk Factors in a National Sample Vérifié
    A Negative Birth Experience: Prevalence and Risk Factors in a National Sample
    Statistique
    7% of women had a negative birth experience assessed at 1 year postpartum; risk factors included emergency operative delivery, induction, pain, and lack of control
    Extrait
    “"Seven percent of the women had a negative birth experience. Risk factors for a negative birth experience included not being treated with respect, lack of emotional support from midwives, emergency cesarean section, instrumental delivery, induction, too much pain, and labor complications." ”
    Données source de
    2004-03-01
    Consulté le
    2026-05-04
    Vérification
    Extrait récupéré et confirmé de manière indépendante, mot pour mot, par rapport à la source citée lors de notre audit de vérification.
    Calcul
    Waldenström et al. (2004) recruited 3,061 women at all Swedish antenatal clinics over one calendar year; 2,541 completed the 1-year postal follow-up. At the time of the study, Sweden's national cesarean rate was approximately 15%, meaning the vast majority of participants (approximately 85%) delivered vaginally. The 7% negative-birth-experience rate is therefore broadly representative of vaginal delivery experience. "Negative birth experience" was measured by a validated single-item scale at 1 year; this is a proxy for regret rather than a direct measure of it. Risk factors list emergency cesarean as a distinct category, confirming the vaginal-birth sample dominates the non-negative group.
    Indépendance
    National population-based Swedish cohort; fully independent of the UK Porter survey and US Konheim-Kalkstein study in country, era, and methodology.
  2. [2] International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health / Ginter et al. — The Impact of Mode of Birth on Childbirth-Related PTSD Symptoms beyond 6 Months Postpartum: An Integrative Review
    The Impact of Mode of Birth on Childbirth-Related PTSD Symptoms beyond 6 Months Postpartum: An Integrative Review
    Statistique
    Spontaneous vaginal delivery PTSD rate ~1.8% at 6+ months postpartum; emergency cesarean 4.8%; forceps 4.2%
    Extrait
    “"CB-PTS/D rates by mode at ≥6 months postpartum from the largest cohort included: spontaneous vaginal 1.8%, operative vaginal 4.2%, elective cesarean 3.1%, emergency cesarean 4.8%." ”
    Données source de
    2022-07-11
    Consulté le
    2026-05-04
    Calcul
    Ginter et al. (2022) integrative review of 26 quantitative and 2 qualitative studies on childbirth-related PTSD by mode of delivery. Spontaneous vaginal birth consistently showed the lowest PTSD rate (1.8%), substantially below emergency cesarean (4.8%) and even elective cesarean (3.1%). These rates support the directional finding that vaginal delivery results in fewer negative psychological outcomes than cesarean (especially emergency) delivery. The PTSD rate (1.8%) is lower than the Waldenström negative-birth-experience rate (7%) because PTSD is a more restrictive clinical construct than general negative experience; both are cited to triangulate the inaction-side estimate.
    Indépendance
    Systematic integrative review of 28 studies spanning multiple countries and decades; independent of Waldenström, Porter, and Konheim-Kalkstein.

Réserves

Les deux côtés de cette entrée mesurent des constructions liées mais distinctes dans différentes populations et époques : le côté action utilise « l'insatisfaction » d'une enquête postale écossaise sur des césariennes mixtes planifiées/non planifiées (Porter 2007) ; le côté inaction utilise « l'expérience de naissance négative » d'une cohorte prospective nationale suédoise (Waldenström 2004). Ce sont des proxies pour le regret, pas des mesures d'échelle de regret direct. La direction de l'écart 19% vs 7% est cohérente avec la littérature sur le PTSD (Ginter 2022 : césarienne d'urgence 4,8%, vaginale spontanée 1,8%), avec un soutien supplémentaire de la méta-analyse Carter et al. (2022) Birth montrant que la césarienne entraîne une plus grande charge de PTSD. La mise en garde clé au sein du groupe est que la césarienne non planifiée/d'urgence stimule le signal d'expérience négative : Konheim-Kalkstein (2021) a constaté 73% de regret spécifiquement chez les femmes ayant subi une césarienne non planifiée — bien plus élevé que la moyenne mixte de 19% pour les césariennes. La satisfaction de la césarienne élective planifiée est substantiellement plus élevée (~85% satisfaites de la décision, Coates 2021). Le regret_delta de 0,12 représente l'écart moyen au niveau de la population, qui masque une variation de sous-groupe significative. L'échantillon suédois de Waldenström du début des années 2000 peut ne pas refléter pleinement l'expérience obstétricale actuelle des pays à revenu élevé étant donné les changements dans la gestion de la douleur, la prise de décision partagée et les soins de soutien. Notamment, un suivi à long terme de 2017 (Tully et al., AJOG) a constaté qu'à 10+ ans, les femmes ayant accouché par voie vaginale rapportaient un plus grand accomplissement et moins de détresse que celles ayant accouché par césarienne, cohérent avec le schéma d'inaction-dominance dans les délais plus longs.

Données brutes : /api/decisions.json

Récemment consultés sur cet appareil