Lewati ke konten
Likelier

Penyesalan bertindak vs. tidak bertindak

Bersuara tentang masalah vs diam menghindari konflik

Jika Anda bertindak

Angkat bicara

38%

Jika Anda tidak bertindak

Tetap diam

53%

Persentase orang yang kemudian menyesali setiap pilihan. Diagram batang dan catatan lengkap ditampilkan di bawah.


Career

Terakhir ditinjau 2026-04-26

Kualitas bukti 4.75/5

Skor tinjauan delapan dimensi terhadap rubrik kualitas . Setiap dimensi dinilai 1–5.

D1 Verifikasi sumber
5/5
D2 Otoritas & independensi sumber
5/5
D3 Akurasi tingkat penyesalan
4/5
D4 Keterbandingan sumber
5/5
D5 Pola Gilovich
5/5
D6 Kualitas prosa
5/5
D7 Kelengkapan peringatan
5/5
D8 Kualitas sampel
4/5
Rata-rata 4.75/5
Bukti langsung
Two identical office chairs at a conference table, one pushed back with a microphone in front, the other tucked in with an empty place setting.

Penyesalan atas tindakan

Angkat bicara

38%

38% menyesali berbicara dalam rapat

Pekerja di AS, Inggris, Prancis, Jerman

retrospektif, tidak ada kerangka waktu tetap

Penyesalan atas kelambanan

Tetap diam

53%

53% menyesali tidak berbicara dalam rapat

Pekerja di AS, Inggris, Prancis, Jerman

retrospektif, tidak ada kerangka waktu tetap

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

inaction dominates — Tidak bertindak mendominasi — sebagian besar menyesali karena tidak bertindak.

Keputusan terkait

Keputusan yang serupa secara semantik — area yang sama, kompromi yang berbeda.

career

Ganti karier

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Ketidakaktifan mendominasi

Penyesalan tidak bertindak 1.5× lebih tinggi

careerLangsung

Minta kenaikan gaji

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Ketidakaktifan mendominasi

Penyesalan tidak bertindak 3.0× lebih tinggi

career

Resign

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Ketidakaktifan mendominasi

Penyesalan tidak bertindak 2.2× lebih tinggi

career

Karier vs keseimbangan

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Tindakan mendominasi

Penyesalan bertindak 1.3× lebih tinggi

career

Kejar promosi vs terima peran

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Ketidakaktifan mendominasi

Penyesalan tidak bertindak 1.9× lebih tinggi

lifestyle

Akui kesalahan serius vs. tutupi

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Ketidakaktifan mendominasi

Penyesalan tidak bertindak 2.9× lebih tinggi

career

Memulai bisnis

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Ketidakaktifan mendominasi

Penyesalan tidak bertindak 5.5× lebih tinggi

lifestyle

Protes vs. diam

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Ketidakaktifan mendominasi

Penyesalan tidak bertindak 3.3× lebih tinggi

53% of workers say they have regretted not speaking up in a meeting, compared to 38% who regret having spoken up, according to Resume Now’s International Career Regrets Survey of 1,000 workers across the US, UK, France, and Germany. The gap is real but moderate — a 1.4:1 ratio that puts workplace voice closer to “balanced” than the lopsided inaction dominance seen in domains like travel or career risk-taking. A separate Zety survey of over 1,000 US workers found that 98% harbored some form of career regret, with women regretting not speaking up at a rate 34% higher than men.

The academic underpinning comes from Detert and Edmondson’s 2011 research on implicit voice theories — the taken-for-granted beliefs employees hold about when speaking up is risky or futile. Across 190 interviews and follow-up survey studies, they documented five distinct self-censorship rules that suppress voice even when the message would benefit the organization. The mechanism is straightforward: people default to silence because the social cost of speaking up (embarrassing a manager, being labeled a troublemaker) feels immediate and concrete, while the cost of silence (a problem festers, an opportunity evaporates) is diffuse and delayed. Gilovich and Medvec’s temporal pattern predicts exactly this: the sting of having spoken up fades as people rationalize or forget, but the nagging sense of “I should have said something” compounds over time.

The modest delta here deserves a caveat the flashier regret pairs do not need. Speaking up at work is not costless — 43% of employees fear retaliation for voicing concerns, and research shows that frequent or low-quality voice can lower status and performance ratings. This is one of the few domains where action regret holds non-trivial ground because the consequences of speaking up (a damaged relationship, a lost promotion) can be concrete and lasting. The directional finding still favors action, consistent with the broader regret literature, but the margin is narrow enough that blanket advice to “always speak up” would overstate what the data support.

Sumber: tindakan

Buku besar klaim

Setiap angka di bawah ini adalah apa yang dilaporkan masing-masing sumber, dengan kutipan kata demi kata yang kami andalkan dan bagaimana kami sampai pada angka kami. Klik tautan mana saja untuk memverifikasi langsung.

1/2 sumber diverifikasi secara independen kata demi kata terhadap sumber terkutip

  1. [1] Resume Now — The Road Not Taken: Greatest Career Regrets Revealed Terverifikasi
    The Road Not Taken: Greatest Career Regrets Revealed

    See all 8 Likelier entries citing this source →

    Statistik
    38% of workers have regretted speaking up in a meeting
    Kutipan
    “"53% have regretted not speaking up in a meeting, compared to 38% who have regretted speaking up in a meeting." ”
    Data sumber dari
    2025-01-10
    Diakses
    2026-04-26
    Verifikasi
    Kutipan diambil ulang secara independen dan dikonfirmasi kata demi kata terhadap sumber terkutip selama audit pendasaran kami.
    Perhitungan
    Resume Now International Career Regrets Survey of 1,000 workers across four countries (US, UK, France, Germany), fielded January 2024. The 38% figure represents those who specifically regretted having voiced an opinion in a meeting. Used directly as action- side regret rate.
  2. [2] Journal of Management Studies — An Exploratory Study of Employee Silence: Issues that Employees Don't Communicate Upward and Why
    An Exploratory Study of Employee Silence: Issues that Employees Don't Communicate Upward and Why
    Statistik
    85% of employees reported situations where they felt unable to raise an issue to a supervisor despite believing it was important; the most frequent reason was fear of being labeled negatively
    Kutipan
    “"85% of respondents said they had been in situations where they felt unable to raise an issue to a supervisor even though they felt the issue was important. The most frequently mentioned reason for remaining silent was the fear of being viewed or labeled negatively, and as a consequence, damaging valued relationships." ”
    Data sumber dari
    2003-09-01
    Diakses
    2026-04-26
    Perhitungan
    Milliken, Morrison & Hewlin (2003), Journal of Management Studies 40(6), 1453-1476. Interviewed 40 full-time employees across diverse industries. The 85% figure establishes that the vast majority of employees have experienced the voice/silence dilemma. The fear of negative labeling explains why action regret (38%) is non-trivially high in this domain — speaking up carries real social risk that does not fade easily.

Sumber: tidak bertindak

Buku besar klaim

Setiap angka di bawah ini adalah apa yang dilaporkan masing-masing sumber, dengan kutipan kata demi kata yang kami andalkan dan bagaimana kami sampai pada angka kami. Klik tautan mana saja untuk memverifikasi langsung.

2/4 sumber diverifikasi secara independen kata demi kata terhadap sumber terkutip

  1. [1] Resume Now — The Road Not Taken: Greatest Career Regrets Revealed Terverifikasi
    The Road Not Taken: Greatest Career Regrets Revealed

    See all 8 Likelier entries citing this source →

    Statistik
    53% of workers have regretted not speaking up in a meeting
    Kutipan
    “"53% have regretted not speaking up in a meeting, compared to 38% who have regretted speaking up in a meeting." ”
    Data sumber dari
    2025-01-10
    Diakses
    2026-04-26
    Verifikasi
    Kutipan diambil ulang secara independen dan dikonfirmasi kata demi kata terhadap sumber terkutip selama audit pendasaran kami.
    Perhitungan
    Same Resume Now survey as the action side. The 53% figure represents those who specifically regretted remaining silent in a meeting when they had something to say. Used directly as inaction-side regret rate.
  2. [2] Academy of Management Journal — Implicit Voice Theories: Taken-for-Granted Rules of Self-Censorship at Work
    Implicit Voice Theories: Taken-for-Granted Rules of Self-Censorship at Work
    Statistik
    Employees hold five distinct implicit theories that systematically suppress workplace voice even when speaking up would be pro-organizational
    Kutipan
    “"Qualitative data from 190 interviews conducted in a knowledge-intensive multinational corporation suggest that fine-grained implicit theories underlie reluctance to voice even pro-organizational suggestions. Survey measures across subsequent studies establish that these implicit voice theories are widely held and significantly augment explanation of workplace silence." ”
    Data sumber dari
    2011-06-01
    Diakses
    2026-04-26
    Perhitungan
    Detert & Edmondson (2011), Academy of Management Journal 54(3), 461-488. This peer-reviewed study does not provide a single regret percentage but establishes the psychological mechanism behind self-censorship at work. It documents that employees routinely silence themselves based on taken-for-granted beliefs about hierarchy, even when speaking up would benefit the organization. Used as the theoretical anchor for why inaction regret in this domain is so prevalent.
  3. [3] Crucial Learning (formerly VitalSmarts) — Costly Conversations: How Lack of Communication is Costing Organizations Thousands in Revenue Terverifikasi
    Costly Conversations: How Lack of Communication is Costing Organizations Thousands in Revenue
    Statistik
    43% of 1,100 employees estimate wasting two weeks or more ruminating about unresolved workplace problems; 1 in 3 estimate silence cost their organization at least $25,000
    Kutipan
    “"43 percent of respondents estimate they waste two weeks or more ruminating about an unresolved problem at work. 1 in 3 employees estimate their inability to speak up in a crucial moment has cost their organization at least $25,000." ”
    Data sumber dari
    2022-02-15
    Diakses
    2026-04-26
    Verifikasi
    Kutipan diambil ulang secara independen dan dikonfirmasi kata demi kata terhadap sumber terkutip selama audit pendasaran kami.
    Perhitungan
    Crucial Learning (formerly VitalSmarts) survey of 1,100 employees, December 2021 (follow-up to 2016 study). The 43% rumination figure and the financial cost estimates demonstrate that workplace silence generates significant ongoing regret and cognitive burden. Independently sourced from the Resume Now survey, corroborating the high inaction-regret pattern.
  4. [4] Zety — Biggest Career Regrets Revealed: Learn from Others' Mistakes
    Biggest Career Regrets Revealed: Learn from Others' Mistakes
    Statistik
    98% of 1,000+ respondents experienced career regret; women regretted not speaking up at work at a rate 34% higher than men
    Kutipan
    “"Female respondents most frequently lamented not speaking up about a problem at work, at a rate of 34 percent more than men. Just 2 percent reported they had no career regrets." ”
    Data sumber dari
    2019-10-01
    Diakses
    2026-04-26
    Perhitungan
    Zety survey of 1,000+ US workers. The 98% figure refers to overall career regret, not speaking-up regret specifically. The 34% gender gap highlights that not speaking up is disproportionately regretted by women. Used as corroborating evidence for the inaction-regret pattern.

Catatan

Tingkat tindakan dan non-tindakan inti (38% dan 53%) berasal dari survei Resume Now yang sama, yang merupakan kekuatan untuk perbandingan langsung tetapi keterbatasan karena sampel adalah pengguna situs karier yang dipilih sendiri — kemungkinan lebih terlibat karier daripada populasi umum. Pertanyaan menanyakan tentang rapat secara khusus, bukan semua keheningan tempat kerja; penyesalan tentang diam pada masalah etika atau keselamatan mungkin secara substansial lebih tinggi. Konfirmasi independen datang dari tiga sumber tambahan: Milliken, Morrison & Hewlin (2003) menemukan 85% karyawan telah mengalami dilema suara/keheningan; survei Crucial Learning 2021 dari 1.100 karyawan menemukan 43% membuang dua minggu atau lebih merenungkan masalah yang tidak terpecahkan. Rasio 1,4:1 sederhana menurut standar pasangan-penyesalan; suara tempat kerja adalah salah satu dari sedikit domain di mana penyesalan tindakan secara non-trivial tinggi.

Data mentah: /api/decisions.json

Baru-baru ini dilihat di perangkat ini