Zum Inhalt springen
Likelier

Reue durch Handeln vs. Nichthandeln

Gemeinsam als Familie essen vs getrennt und hastig essen

Wenn du handelst

Regelmäßige Familienmahlzeiten

9,0%

Wenn du nicht handelst

Getrennt oder in Eile essen

62%

Anteil derer, die jede Entscheidung später bereuen. Balken und vollständige Datengrundlage erscheinen unten.


Familie

Zuletzt überprüft 2026-04-26

Evidenzqualität 4.13/5

Bewertungsergebnis nach acht Dimensionen gemäß der Qualitätsrubrik . Jede Dimension wird mit 1–5 bewertet.

D1 Quellenüberprüfung
5/5
D2 Quellenautorität & Unabhängigkeit
4/5
D3 Genauigkeit der Bedauernsrate
2/5
D4 Vergleichbarkeit der Quellen
3/5
D5 Gilovich-Muster
5/5
D6 Prosaqualität
5/5
D7 Vollständigkeit der Einschränkungen
5/5
D8 Stichprobenqualität
4/5
Durchschnitt 4.13/5
A dining table set for a family meal on one side, a counter with a lone takeout container on the other.

Reue fürs Handeln

Regelmäßige Familienmahlzeiten

9,0%

9 % der Eltern empfinden Familienessen nicht als stressmindernd (Näherung)

US-Erwachsene, national repräsentativ

retrospektiv, kein fester Zeitraum

Reue fürs Unterlassen

Getrennt oder in Eile essen

62%

62 % der Eltern wünschten häufigere Familienabendessen (Wunsch-Lücken-Näherung)

US-Eltern mit Kindern unter 18

retrospektiv, kein fester Zeitraum

% bereuen diese Entscheidung

inaction dominates — Nichthandeln dominiert — die meisten bereuen, nicht gehandelt zu haben.

Verwandte Entscheidungen

Semantisch ähnliche Entscheidungen — gleiches Terrain, andere Abwägungen.

family

Privat vs öffentlich

% bereuen diese Entscheidung

Untätigkeit überwiegt

Reue über Untätigkeit 3.2× höher

family

Zuhause vs berufstätig

% bereuen diese Entscheidung

Handlung überwiegt

Reue über Handlung 1.3× höher

family

Eingreifen vs. selbst lösen lassen

% bereuen diese Entscheidung

Handlung überwiegt

Reue über Handlung 1.2× höher

family

Disziplin vs. Nachsicht

% bereuen diese Entscheidung

Untätigkeit überwiegt

Reue über Untätigkeit 2.4× höher

lifestyle

Häufiges Snacken

% bereuen diese Entscheidung

Untätigkeit überwiegt

Reue über Untätigkeit 1.8× höher

family

Strukturiert vs freies Spiel

% bereuen diese Entscheidung

Handlung überwiegt

Reue über Handlung 2.6× höher

family

Familiengröße

% bereuen diese Entscheidung

Untätigkeit überwiegt

Reue über Untätigkeit 2.6× höher

family

Pflegeheim vs. Heimpflege

% bereuen diese Entscheidung

Handlung überwiegt

Reue über Handlung 2.3× höher

A YouGov poll found that 62% of parents with children under 18 wish they had family dinners more often — the dominant inaction-side signal in this entry. On the action side, a 2022 American Heart Association survey of 1,000 US adults found that 9% of parents do not report stress reduction from regular family meals — and 84% wish they could share meals more often. The resulting 7:1 ratio between inaction-side aspiration and action-side dissatisfaction is striking but relies on asymmetric measurements — one asks about stress relief, the other about aspirational frequency — so the exact magnitude should be handled with caution.

The downstream associations of infrequent family meals are better documented than the regret itself. Harrison et al.’s systematic review of 14 studies confirmed inverse associations between family meal frequency and depression, substance use, and suicidal ideation in adolescents. These are correlational findings subject to obvious confounding — families that manage regular dinners differ socioeconomically and structurally from those that don’t — but the consistency across studies and populations makes the direction of effect reasonably secure. The aspiration gap (wanting more family meals) likely reflects both genuine awareness of these benefits and cultural messaging about what “good families” do.

The counterweight is real but poorly quantified. A 2025 BMC Public Health review argued that the “family dinner ideal” places uneven pressure on low-income, single-parent, and shift-working households, and that evidence for what specifically about the shared meal produces benefits — as opposed to the general family stability it proxies — remains thin. Quality of interaction appears to matter more than mere co-presence at a table. The aspiration gap here likely reflects genuine loss when connection opportunities are forfeited, but some of the 62% who wish for more dinners may be responding to cultural expectation rather than lived deprivation. Neither rate is a direct regret measure, and both are flagged as proxies accordingly.

Quellen: Handeln

Quellenregister

Jede Zahl unten ist das, was die jeweilige Quelle berichtet hat — mit dem wörtlichen Zitat, auf das wir uns stützen, und wie wir zu unserer Zahl gelangt sind. Klicke auf einen Link, um direkt zu prüfen.

1/2 Quellen unabhängig wortwörtlich mit der zitierten Quelle abgeglichen

  1. [1] American Heart Association / Wakefield Research — New survey: 91% of parents say their family is less stressed when they eat together
    New survey: 91% of parents say their family is less stressed when they eat together
    Statistik
    91% of parents say their family is less stressed when they regularly connect over a meal; 84% wish they could share a meal together more often
    Auszug
    “"91 percent of parents notice their family is less stressed when they regularly connect over a meal. The survey also found that 84% of adults say they wish they could eat more meals with others." ”
    Quelldaten von
    2022-10-10
    Abgerufen
    2026-04-26
    Berechnung
    Wakefield Research for AHA, 1,000 nationally representative US adults ages 18+, September 14–20 2022, online survey. MOE +/-3.1pp at 95% CI. The 9% who do not report stress reduction is the complement of the 91% headline. We use this as an upper-bound proxy for action-regret: among parents who do eat together, a small minority find no benefit. This is a satisfaction complement, not a regret measure — flagged as "(proxy)".
  2. [2] BMC Public Health — Unpacking family meals: state-of-the-art review critiquing the Western ideals, positioning and promotion of family meals Verifiziert
    Unpacking family meals: state-of-the-art review critiquing the Western ideals, positioning and promotion of family meals
    Statistik
    Family meal promotion reinforces unrealistic expectations on resource-pressured families; evidence on what specifically helps is limited
    Auszug
    “"Evidence surrounding what specifically about the family meal offers health benefits is limited, and family meals carry a level of moral value, evoking pressure for parents to 'achieve' a family meal ideal, unattainable for many." ”
    Quelldaten von
    2025-02-11
    Abgerufen
    2026-04-26
    Verifizierung
    Der Auszug wurde bei unserer Grounding-Prüfung unabhängig erneut abgerufen und Wort für Wort mit der zitierten Quelle abgeglichen.
    Berechnung
    Narrative review, not a prevalence study. Included to establish that the action side is not costless: logistical burden and social pressure are real downsides for some families. Does not supply its own regret percentage.

Quellen: Nichthandeln

Quellenregister

Jede Zahl unten ist das, was die jeweilige Quelle berichtet hat — mit dem wörtlichen Zitat, auf das wir uns stützen, und wie wir zu unserer Zahl gelangt sind. Klicke auf einen Link, um direkt zu prüfen.

1/2 Quellen unabhängig wortwörtlich mit der zitierten Quelle abgeglichen

  1. [1] YouGov — Most parents wish they were having family dinners more often
    Most parents wish they were having family dinners more often
    Statistik
    62% of parents with children under 18 wish they could have family dinners 'much more often' or 'somewhat more often'
    Auszug
    “"Roughly six in 10 (62%) parents with children under 18 say they would like to have family dinners 'much more often' or 'somewhat more often.' Parents of children and teenagers (87%) are especially likely to say they have a family dinner with all members of their home at least once a week." ”
    Quelldaten von
    2019-10-28
    Abgerufen
    2026-04-26
    Berechnung
    YouGov online survey, 1,220 US adults (938 sharing a household), October 21–22 2019, weighted to be nationally representative. The 62% is among parents with children under 18 who wish dinners happened more often. This measures aspiration gap (wanting more of something you believe is good), not classical retrospective regret. Flagged as "(aspiration-gap proxy)".
  2. [2] Canadian Family Physician (Harrison et al.) — Systematic review of the effects of family meal frequency on psychosocial outcomes in youth Verifiziert
    Systematic review of the effects of family meal frequency on psychosocial outcomes in youth
    Statistik
    Frequent family meals are inversely associated with substance use, depression, suicidal ideation, and violent behaviour in adolescents
    Auszug
    “"Overall, results show that frequent family meals are inversely associated with disordered eating, alcohol and substance use, violent behaviour, and feelings of depression or thoughts of suicide in adolescents, and there is a positive relationship between frequent family meals and increased self-esteem and school success." ”
    Quelldaten von
    2015-02-01
    Abgerufen
    2026-04-26
    Verifizierung
    Der Auszug wurde bei unserer Grounding-Prüfung unabhängig erneut abgerufen und Wort für Wort mit der zitierten Quelle abgeglichen.
    Berechnung
    Systematic review of 14 studies from MEDLINE and PsycINFO (searches 1948–2011). Not a prevalence figure; included to establish the consequence basis for why parents aspire to more family meals — the downstream associations are well documented, though correlational and subject to confounding.

Einschränkungen

Neither figure is a direct regret measurement — both are explicitly flagged as proxies in regret_display. The 9% action-side figure is the complement of parents who report stress reduction from family meals — a satisfaction-inversion proxy, not a measure of anyone saying "I regret eating together." The 62% inaction-side figure captures wishing for more dinners (aspiration gap), which is closer to cultural expectation than classical retrospective regret. No large-scale survey directly asks "do you regret not eating together as a family?" The AHA 2022 survey also found 84% wish they could share meals more often, corroborating the YouGov direction. The YouGov sample includes parents who already eat together regularly but want more, inflating the inaction rate relative to true never-did-it regret. The Harrison et al. systematic review on teen substance use (infrequent diners more likely to use tobacco) is correlational and subject to confounding: families that eat together differ from those that don't in ways beyond the meal itself. The BMC Public Health review notes that the "family dinner ideal" places disproportionate pressure on low-income and single-parent households, so the aspiration gap may partly reflect cultural norming rather than evidence of net harm from missed meals. The 7:1 ratio between inaction and action rates is directionally robust but overstates the true regret asymmetry given the weak proxy on the action side.

Rohdaten: /api/decisions.json

Zuletzt auf diesem Gerät angesehen