Aller au contenu
Likelier

Regret d’agir vs. de ne pas agir

Discipliner par les cris et les fessées vs une parentalité douce et de faible intensité

Si vous agissez

Cris et fessées comme discipline

42%

Si vous n’agissez pas

Céder / discipline douce de faible intensité

35%

Pourcentage de personnes qui regrettent ensuite chaque choix. Les barres et le registre complet s’affichent ci-dessous.


Famille

Dernière révision 2026-05-24

Qualité des preuves 4.5/5

Score d’évaluation en huit dimensions selon la grille de qualité . Chaque dimension notée de 1 à 5.

D1 Vérification des sources
5/5
D2 Autorité et indépendance des sources
5/5
D3 Précision du taux de regret
3/5
D4 Comparabilité des sources
3/5
D5 Motif de Gilovich
5/5
D6 Qualité de la prose
5/5
D7 Complétude des réserves
5/5
D8 Qualité de l’échantillon
5/5
Moyenne 4.5/5
A wooden spoon and a soft cloth bear sitting side by side on a kitchen counter, both still and unused.

Regret d'action

Cris et fessées comme discipline

42%

42 % des parents américains de jeunes enfants déclarent ne pas vouloir crier ou hausser le ton aussi vite qu'ils le font

Parents américains d'enfants âgés de 0 à 5 ans, enquête en ligne

auto-déclaration sur la parentalité actuelle, collectée en octobre 2015

Regret d'inaction

Céder / discipline douce de faible intensité

35%

35 % des parents américains déclarent qu'ils ont tendance à céder trop vite lorsque leurs enfants leur demandent quelque chose

Parents américains d'enfants de moins de 18 ans, panel représentatif au niveau national

auto-déclaration sur la parentalité actuelle, collectée en septembre-octobre 2022

% regrettent ce choix

action dominates — L'action domine — la plupart regrettent d'avoir agi.

Décisions associées

Décisions sémantiquement similaires — même terrain, compromis différents.

family

Discipline vs permissivité

% regrettent ce choix

L'inaction domine

Regret d'inaction 2.4× plus élevé

family

Gâter vs. modérer les cadeaux

% regrettent ce choix

L'action domine

Regret d'action 2.9× plus élevé

family

Intervenir vs. laisser chercher

% regrettent ce choix

L'action domine

Regret d'action 1.2× plus élevé

family

Activités vs jeu libre

% regrettent ce choix

L'action domine

Regret d'action 2.6× plus élevé

family

Liberté vs surprotection

% regrettent ce choix

L'action domine

Regret d'action 2.3× plus élevé

family

Taille de la famille

% regrettent ce choix

L'inaction domine

Regret d'inaction 2.6× plus élevé

family

Privé vs public

% regrettent ce choix

L'inaction domine

Regret d'inaction 3.2× plus élevé

family

Parent au foyer vs actif

% regrettent ce choix

L'action domine

Regret d'action 1.3× plus élevé

Approximately 42% of US parents of young children say they do not want to yell or raise their voice as quickly as they do, and 30% of those who use physical discipline report spanking even though they do not feel okay about it. The Zero to Three / Bezos Family Foundation National Parent Survey of 2,200 US parents of children aged 0-5 anchored these figures in 2015; Gershoff and Grogan-Kaylor’s 2016 meta-analysis in the Journal of Family Psychology, pooling 75 studies and 160,927 children, established that the long-asserted compliance benefits of spanking do not exist — spanking was linked to 13 of 17 detrimental child outcomes, with effect sizes statistically indistinguishable from physical abuse. On the other side, 35% of US parents of children under 18 say they tend to give in too quickly when their kids ask for things, a near-symmetric 30% acknowledging the opposite tendency of sticking to their guns too much, drawn from Pew Research Center’s 2023 nationally representative survey of 3,757 US parents. Parental self-criticism is roughly evenly distributed across the discipline axis, with a modest tilt toward harshness regret.

The small action-leaning delta — 42% versus 35% — sits inside a broader pattern documented by Pew across two waves of its Parenting in America series. In 2015, 44% of US parents said they sometimes criticized their kids too much against 33% saying they offered too much praise; fathers were more likely than mothers to acknowledge over-rigidity (50% versus 38%). By 2022 the absolute rates had compressed (20% over-criticism, 26% over-praise) and the tilt had reversed: parents were slightly more likely to admit over-praising than over-criticizing, the opposite of the 2015 pattern. The psychological reading is that disciplinary regret runs in both directions because parents are calibrating against an implicit ideal of measured firmness, and most miss in one direction or the other on any given day. The discipline axis as a whole is more visible to parents than the warmth axis: parents readily report whether they criticize or indulge too much, but no representative survey asks whether they show their children enough affection.

The main caveat is that these are real-time tendency acknowledgments rather than retrospective lifetime regret of parenting style. A parent saying “I tend to yell more than I want to” is reporting an in-the-moment mismatch between intended and actual behavior, not a settled evaluation of how they raised their child. The Zero to Three age range (parents of children 0-5) biases the action-side number toward early-childhood parents, when yelling and physical discipline are most common; comparable lifetime rates for parents of older children and teenagers are not measured in any large public dataset. Neither survey isolates the emotional-warmth dimension that runs orthogonal to discipline intensity. The discipline axis is well-charted; the warmth axis remains, in survey terms, dark.

Sources : action

Registre des sources

Chaque chiffre ci-dessous correspond à ce que la source a rapporté, avec la citation textuelle sur laquelle nous nous sommes appuyés et la méthode de calcul. Cliquez sur un lien pour vérifier directement.

3/3 sources vérifiées de manière indépendante, mot pour mot, par rapport à la source citée

  1. [1] Zero to Three / Bezos Family Foundation — National Parent Survey: Overview and Key Insights Vérifié
    National Parent Survey: Overview and Key Insights
    Statistique
    42% of US parents say they do not want to yell or raise their voice as quickly as they do; 35% say they do not want to lose their temper so fast; 30% say they spank even though they do not feel okay about it
    Extrait
    “"Forty-two percent of parents reported that they do not want to yell or raise their voice as quickly as they do, 35% do not want to lose their temper so fast, and 30% of parents who use spanking as a form of discipline reported that they spank even though they don't feel okay about it." ”
    Données source de
    2016-06-06
    Consulté le
    2026-05-24
    Vérification
    Extrait récupéré et confirmé de manière indépendante, mot pour mot, par rapport à la source citée lors de notre audit de vérification.
    Calcul
    Zero to Three / Bezos Family Foundation National Parent Survey: online survey of 2,200 US parents of children aged 0-5, fielded October 2015, weighted to be representative of US parents in that age band. The 42% figure is the direct percentage of parents acknowledging that their actual disciplinary behavior is harsher than the behavior they want — the closest survey measure to harsh-discipline regret. This captures real-time discrepancy between intended and actual behavior, not a retrospective lifetime evaluation of parenting style. The 30% spanking-with-discomfort subset is a tighter measure of regretted physical discipline among the subset who spank at all.
  2. [2] Journal of Family Psychology (Gershoff & Grogan-Kaylor) — Spanking and Child Outcomes: Old Controversies and New Meta-Analyses Vérifié
    Spanking and Child Outcomes: Old Controversies and New Meta-Analyses

    See all 2 Likelier entries citing this source →

    Statistique
    Meta-analysis of 75 studies and 160,927 children found spanking significantly linked with 13 of 17 detrimental outcomes; effect sizes did not differ substantially between spanking and physical abuse
    Extrait
    “"Thirteen of 17 mean effect sizes were significantly different from zero and all indicated a link between spanking and increased risk for detrimental child outcomes. Effect sizes did not substantially differ between spanking and physical abuse or by study design characteristics. Spanking was not associated with more immediate or long-term compliance." ”
    Données source de
    2016-06-01
    Consulté le
    2026-05-24
    Vérification
    Extrait récupéré et confirmé de manière indépendante, mot pour mot, par rapport à la source citée lors de notre audit de vérification.
    Calcul
    Gershoff & Grogan-Kaylor (2016) meta-analysis in the Journal of Family Psychology pooled 75 studies and 160,927 children to test whether spanking produces the compliance benefits often claimed by its defenders. It does not. Used here as the evidence base supporting parental discomfort with spanking: parents who report spanking with discomfort (the 30% in Zero to Three) are reading the same outcome pattern this meta-analysis confirms.
  3. [3] Pew Research Center — Parenting in America: Parenting Approaches and Concerns Vérifié
    Parenting in America: Parenting Approaches and Concerns
    Statistique
    44% of US parents say they sometimes criticize their kids too much (49% of fathers, 39% of mothers); 38% of mothers and 50% of fathers say they sometimes stick to their guns too much
    Extrait
    “"More also say they criticize their kids too much than say they offer too much praise (44% vs. 33%). Among parents of children younger than 18, 38% of mothers and 50% of fathers say they sometimes stick to their guns too much when they should give more ground." ”
    Données source de
    2015-12-17
    Consulté le
    2026-05-24
    Vérification
    Extrait récupéré et confirmé de manière indépendante, mot pour mot, par rapport à la source citée lors de notre audit de vérification.
    Calcul
    Pew Research Center "Parenting in America" survey of 1,807 US parents of children under 18, fielded September 15 - October 13, 2015. The 44% over-criticism and 38-50% over-rigidity figures corroborate the Zero to Three finding that a substantial minority of parents recognize their disciplinary intensity as harsher than intended. Used as cross-source confirmation of the harsh-discipline regret pattern.

Sources : inaction

Registre des sources

Chaque chiffre ci-dessous correspond à ce que la source a rapporté, avec la citation textuelle sur laquelle nous nous sommes appuyés et la méthode de calcul. Cliquez sur un lien pour vérifier directement.

1/2 sources vérifiées de manière indépendante, mot pour mot, par rapport à la source citée

  1. [1] Pew Research Center — Parenting in America Today Vérifié
    Parenting in America Today

    See all 2 Likelier entries citing this source →

    Statistique
    35% of US parents of children under 18 say they tend to give in too quickly; 30% say they tend to stick to their guns too much
    Extrait
    “"Somewhat larger shares say they tend to give in too quickly (35%) rather than stick to their guns too much (30%)." ”
    Données source de
    2023-01-24
    Consulté le
    2026-05-24
    Vérification
    Extrait récupéré et confirmé de manière indépendante, mot pour mot, par rapport à la source citée lors de notre audit de vérification.
    Calcul
    Pew Research Center "Parenting in America Today" nationally representative survey of 3,757 US parents of children under 18, fielded September 20 - October 2, 2022. The 35% figure is the direct counterpart to the harsh-discipline measure on the action side: parents acknowledging that their disciplinary tendency runs softer than they want it to. Like the action-side rate, this is a real-time tendency acknowledgment, not a retrospective lifetime evaluation. The 35%/30% near-symmetry of the give-in / hold-firm self-criticism rates is one of the cleanest two-sided anchors available in US parenting research.
  2. [2] Pew Research Center — Parenting in America: Parenting Approaches and Concerns
    Parenting in America: Parenting Approaches and Concerns
    Statistique
    33% of US parents say they sometimes offer their kids too much praise
    Extrait
    “"More also say they criticize their kids too much than say they offer too much praise (44% vs. 33%)." ”
    Données source de
    2015-12-17
    Consulté le
    2026-05-24
    Calcul
    Pew 2015 over-praise figure (33%) is the closest 2015-vintage analogue to the 2023 "give in too quickly" rate (35%). Cross-time consistency at roughly one-third of US parents acknowledging excessive permissiveness or indulgence supports treating 35% as a stable inaction-side anchor rather than a one-survey artifact.

Réserves

Les deux côtés rapportent des reconnaissances de tendances en temps réel plutôt qu'un regret rétrospectif sur l'ensemble de la vie concernant le style parental. Le taux de 42 % du côté dur (Zero to Three 2015) et celui de 35 % du côté doux (Pew 2023) proviennent d'enquêtes différentes, d'années différentes et de populations légèrement différentes : Zero to Three a interrogé spécifiquement les parents d'enfants de 0 à 5 ans, tandis que Pew a interrogé les parents de tous les enfants de moins de 18 ans. Les deux enquêtes ne sont pas des comparaisons directes. L'écart étroit de 7 points de pourcentage doit être lu comme un schéma faible mais cohérent — les parents reconnaissent des tendances dures marginalement plus souvent que des tendances permissives — plutôt que comme une marge précise. La tranche d'âge de Zero to Three biaise le chiffre du côté action vers les parents plus jeunes, lorsque les cris et la discipline physique sont plus courants ; les taux comparables sur la durée de vie parmi les parents d'adolescents pourraient être encore plus élevés. Aucune enquête n'isole la dimension de la chaleur émotionnelle, qui est orthogonale à l'intensité disciplinaire : un parent peut être dur et chaleureux, dur et froid, doux et chaleureux, ou doux et froid, et ces quatre quadrants comportent probablement des profils de regret très différents que la base d'enquêtes actuelle ne peut pas résoudre.

Données brutes : /api/decisions.json

Récemment consultés sur cet appareil