Persentase orang yang kemudian menyesali setiap pilihan. Diagram batang dan catatan lengkap ditampilkan di bawah.
Lifestyle
Terakhir ditinjau 2026-05-30
Kualitas bukti 4.38/5
Skor tinjauan delapan dimensi terhadap
rubrik kualitas
. Setiap dimensi dinilai 1–5.
D1 Verifikasi sumber
5/5
D2 Otoritas & independensi sumber
5/5
D3 Akurasi tingkat penyesalan
2/5
D4 Keterbandingan sumber
4/5
D5 Pola Gilovich
4/5
D6 Kualitas prosa
5/5
D7 Kelengkapan peringatan
5/5
D8 Kualitas sampel
5/5
Rata-rata4.38/5
Data proksi — tidak ada survei penyesalan langsung untuk keputusan ini. Tingkat diturunkan dari skor kepuasan dan data hambatan akses daripada pertanyaan yang langsung menanyakan tentang penyesalan. Lihat peringatan di bawah.
Penyesalan atas tindakan
Penggunaan pornografi rutin
9,0%
~9% orang dewasa AS saat ini berusaha menghentikan penggunaan pornografi (proxy dari Barna; tidak ada survei penyesalan retrospektif langsung)
Orang dewasa AS 25+, panel online populasi-umum
upaya penghentian saat ini, dilakukan Juli–Agustus 2015
Penyesalan atas kelambanan
Pantang total dari pornografi
3,0%
~3% perkiraan tingkat penyesalan untuk pantang total (tidak ada survei langsung; proxy dari permintaan porno yang terdokumentasi rendah di antara pantang dan kerangka Roese-Summerville)
Orang dewasa AS yang melaporkan tidak pernah atau jarang menonton pornografi
sentimen retrospektif, inferensi tidak langsung
% menyesal dengan pilihan ini
Penggunaan pornografi rutinPantang total dari pornografi
9,0%3,0%
action dominates — Bertindak mendominasi — sebagian besar menyesali karena bertindak.
Keputusan terkait
Keputusan yang serupa secara semantik — area yang sama, kompromi yang berbeda.
Pornography consumption is unusual among regret-pair dilemmas in that the published evidence points to action-side regret exceeding inaction-side regret at the population level — the inverse of the dominant Gilovich-Medvec pattern in most life decisions. Barna Group’s 2015 study of 1,188 US adults aged 25+ (part of a larger N=3,771 multi-instrument design) found that 9% of the general population are currently trying to stop pornography use, 14% would like to use it less, and 18% would rather not use it at all; 18% report “much guilt” about their use while 54% say it does not really bother them. The 9% currently-trying-to-stop figure is the tightest available proxy for action-side regret — it identifies the slice of users whose behavior is dissonant enough with their preferences that they are actively attempting cessation. No published survey directly asks adults “do you regret your pornography use?”, so this active-cessation rate substitutes for the missing regret item. The inaction side is even less directly measured: no large survey asks abstainers whether they regret abstaining, and pornography does not appear as a top long-term regret domain in Roese and Summerville’s 2005 meta-analysis of 11 regret-ranking datasets. The 3% inaction-side rate is an order-of-magnitude estimate anchored on the absence of any documented regret signal among non-users.
The load-bearing caveat is moral incongruence. Grubbs, Perry, Wilt and Reid’s 2019 meta-analysis in Archives of Sexual Behavior (the canonical PPMI model, PMID 30076491) establishes that self-perceived pornography problems — the cluster that includes attempted cessation, guilt, and distress — are predicted far more strongly by the gap between use and personal beliefs about use than by frequency of use itself. Whelan and Brown’s 2021 cross-sectional study of 942 heterosexual men aged 18-44, published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine, makes the same point through a different lens: pornography use alone showed no significant association with erectile dysfunction, premature ejaculation, or sexual dissatisfaction, while self-perceived addiction uniquely predicted all three. The downstream regret signal is generated by the belief that one’s use is problematic, not by the use itself. The 9% Barna headline conflates a religious-conservative subpopulation with high moral-incongruence distress (Barna’s practicing-Christian subsample reports 19% currently trying to stop, 21% wishing to use less, and 40% wanting to stop entirely) with a non-religious population whose use generates near-zero documented distress. Treating the 9% as a single homogeneous regret rate misses the structural fact that the rate is bimodal.
The directional finding — that abstaining from pornography is essentially never regretted in lifetime-regret data while regular use generates a measurable active-cessation signal — should be held loosely on the magnitude side and held firmly on the direction side. The Gilovich-Medvec long-term pattern that dominates most regret-pair entries (84% of biggest-regrets are inactions) does not appear to apply here, because the missed-opportunity mechanism that drives inaction regret in education, career, and romance does not operate symmetrically for pornography: the abstainer who never tried porn does not retrospectively identify a closed window of self-actualization in the way the abstainer who never went to college or never asked someone out does. For occasional users (13-19% of US adults at the 1-2 times per month level, per Barna) the dilemma is less acute than for the regular-user counterfactual modelled here. Cross-national prevalence of problematic-pornography-use criteria ranges from 3.2% to 16.6% across 42 countries in the International Sex Survey (Bőthe et al. PPCS-6 cut-off), so the population denominator for the regret-equivalent group varies substantially by national religious and cultural context, and the 9%/3% US rates should not be transposed directly elsewhere.
Sumber: tindakan
Buku besar klaim
Setiap angka di bawah ini adalah apa yang dilaporkan masing-masing sumber, dengan kutipan kata demi kata yang kami andalkan dan bagaimana kami sampai pada angka kami. Klik tautan mana saja untuk memverifikasi langsung.
1/2 sumber diverifikasi secara independen kata demi kata terhadap sumber terkutip
[1]Barna Group — Porn in the Digital Age: New Research Reveals 10 Trends
Terverifikasi
Sumber referensi
9% of the general adult population currently say they are trying to stop pornography use; 14% say they want to use porn less; 18% would rather not use it at all; 18% report 'much guilt' about their use
Kutipan
“"Nine percent of the general population agree they are currently trying to stop. Fourteen percent say they want to use porn less, and 18 percent would rather not use it all. Only about one in five adults overall (18%) report feeling much guilt; a majority of adults (54%) say it doesn't really bother them."
”
Data sumber dari
2016-04-06
Diakses
2026-05-30
Verifikasi
Kutipan diambil ulang secara independen dan dikonfirmasi kata demi kata terhadap sumber terkutip selama audit pendasaran kami.
Perhitungan
Barna Group's "The Porn Phenomenon" study, fielded July-August 2015 across five online surveys with a total N=3,771; the general-adult subsample of 1,188 US adults aged 25+ carries a margin of error of plus/minus 2.8 points at 95% confidence. The 9% currently-trying-to-stop figure is the tightest available proxy for action-side regret: it identifies adults whose behavior (porn use) is dissonant enough with their preferences that they are actively attempting cessation. The 14% wish-to-use- less and 18% would-rather-not-use-it-at-all figures bound the soft-regret population. No published survey directly asks "do you regret your pornography use?" so the 9% figure is used as the lower-bound active-regret proxy rather than the 14%/18% sentiment indicators.
[2]Archives of Sexual Behavior (Grubbs, Perry, Wilt & Reid) — Pornography Problems Due to Moral Incongruence: An Integrative Model with a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis↗ 1 other entry
Telaah sejawat
Meta-analysis finds self-perceived pornography addiction is more strongly predicted by moral incongruence (the gap between use and beliefs about use) than by use frequency itself
Kutipan
“"[Paraphrase from abstract — full text paywalled] Pornography- related problems—particularly feelings of addiction to pornography—may be, in many cases, better construed as functions of discrepancies—moral incongruence—between pornography-related beliefs and pornography-related behaviors. The systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates support for this model: religiousness and moral disapproval of pornography use consistently predict self-reported addiction and distress, while use frequency is a much weaker predictor."
”
Data sumber dari
2019-02-01
Diakses
2026-05-30
Perhitungan
Grubbs, Perry, Wilt & Reid (2019), Archives of Sexual Behavior 48(2), 397-415. PMID 30076491. Peer-reviewed systematic review and meta-analysis. Used here to establish the load-bearing caveat: action-side regret is heavily mediated by religiosity and moral incongruence, not by use frequency. The 9% Barna figure conflates two distinct populations — religious or morally conflicted users with high distress, and non-religious users whose use generates little subjective distress. The Grubbs meta-analysis is theoretical scaffolding for why the headline rate hides population heterogeneity rather than a direct rate measurement.
Sumber: tidak bertindak
Buku besar klaim
Setiap angka di bawah ini adalah apa yang dilaporkan masing-masing sumber, dengan kutipan kata demi kata yang kami andalkan dan bagaimana kami sampai pada angka kami. Klik tautan mana saja untuk memverifikasi langsung.
1/2 sumber diverifikasi secara independen kata demi kata terhadap sumber terkutip
[1]Barna Group — Porn in the Digital Age: New Research Reveals 10 Trends
Sumber referensi
49% of US adults say they never intentionally seek out pornography; 18% of all adults (and 40% of practicing Christians who use it) would 'rather not use it at all'
Kutipan
“"Nearly half of all adults (49%) say they never intentionally seek out porn... Eighteen percent [of US adults overall] would rather not use it all. Among practicing Christians who use it, 40 percent want to stop entirely."
”
Data sumber dari
2016-04-06
Diakses
2026-05-30
Perhitungan
Same Barna study. The 49% never-intentionally-seek-it-out figure establishes the size of the de facto abstainer population. No survey item asks abstainers whether they regret abstaining — the regret rate is unmeasurable directly. The 3% inaction-side estimate is constructed from two facts: (a) the share of non-using adults who report wishing they used porn is essentially absent from published surveys, suggesting near-zero revealed-preference demand among abstainers; (b) the most likely abstainer profile is religious-conservative, where porn-positive attitudes are systematically rare. The 3% rate should be read as an order-of-magnitude estimate rather than a measurement, and the absence of any direct abstinence-regret survey is itself the finding: the dilemma is asymmetric — action carries documented distress, abstinence carries no documented regret signal.
[2]Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (Roese & Summerville) — What We Regret Most ... and Why
Terverifikasi
↗ 13 other entries
Telaah sejawat
Long-term retrospective regret concentrates in education, career, and romance domains, where the common thread is missed opportunity for self-actualization in high-importance life areas
Kutipan
“"People's biggest regrets are a reflection of where in life they see their largest opportunities; that is, where they see tangible prospects for change, growth, and renewal."
”
Data sumber dari
2005-09-01
Diakses
2026-05-30
Verifikasi
Kutipan diambil ulang secara independen dan dikonfirmasi kata demi kata terhadap sumber terkutip selama audit pendasaran kami.
Perhitungan
Roese & Summerville (2005), Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31(9), 1273-1285. Foundational meta-analysis of 11 regret-ranking datasets. Pornography consumption does not appear as a top regret domain in any large lifetime-regret survey, which is itself informative: across thousands of respondents, abstaining from porn does not register as a missed-opportunity signal. Used as theoretical anchor for why the inaction-side rate is plausibly very low — the regret literature systematically identifies the domains where unchosen paths generate durable retrospection, and pornography abstinence is not one of them. Not a direct measurement; supports the order-of-magnitude construction.
Catatan
PENGUKURAN PROXY DI SELURUH DATA. Tidak ada survei yang dipublikasikan secara langsung menanyakan orang dewasa AS "apakah Anda menyesal penggunaan pornografi Anda?" atau "apakah Anda menyesal pantang dari pornografi?" Tingkat 9% sisi tindakan adalah pangsa orang dewasa populasi-umum yang mengatakan mereka saat ini sedang mencoba menghentikan penggunaan porno (Barna 2015, N=1.188 dalam subsampel dewasa-umum, total studi N=3.771). Tingkat 3% sisi tidak-bertindak adalah perkiraan orde-besaran yang dibangun dari tidak adanya sinyal penyesalan yang terdokumentasi di antara pantang dalam studi pemeringkatan-penyesalan utama dan permintaan terungkap mendekati-nol untuk porno di antara orang dewasa yang saat ini tidak menggunakannya. Temuan arah — penyesalan sisi-tindakan secara bermakna melebihi penyesalan sisi-tidak-bertindak — konsisten dengan basis bukti yang lebih luas, tetapi besaran absolutnya adalah konstruksi proxy.
RELIGIUSITAS DAN INKONGRUENSI MORAL ADALAH MEDIATOR YANG MENJADI TUMPUAN. Meta-analisis Grubbs et al. (2019) menetapkan bahwa masalah pornografi yang dipersepsikan-sendiri melacak inkongruensi moral — kesenjangan antara penggunaan dan keyakinan tentang penggunaan — lebih kuat daripada melacak frekuensi penggunaan. Di antara orang Kristen praktis yang menggunakan porno, pangsa yang mencoba berhenti jauh lebih tinggi (19% sedang mencoba, 21% berharap menggunakan lebih sedikit, 40% ingin berhenti sama sekali) daripada angka populasi umum 9%/14%/18%, dan subsampel Kristen Barna melaporkan 29% merasa banyak rasa bersalah versus 12% untuk orang dewasa yang tidak mempraktikkan. Tingkat headline 9% menyembunyikan heterogenitas ini: ia merata-ratakan populasi konservatif religius dengan kesulitan inkongruensi-moral tinggi dan populasi non-religius dengan kesulitan mendekati-nol tentang penggunaan. Whelan & Brown (2021, Journal of Sexual Medicine, N=942) memperkuat ini: penggunaan pornografi saja tidak menunjukkan asosiasi dengan disfungsi ereksi, ejakulasi dini, atau ketidakpuasan seksual, tetapi kecanduan yang dipersepsikan-sendiri secara unik memprediksi ketiganya — yaitu, keyakinan bahwa penggunaan seseorang bermasalah, bukan penggunaan itu sendiri, menghasilkan sinyal penyesalan hilir.
POLA GILOVICH ATIPIKAL DI SINI. Sebagian besar dilema pasangan-penyesalan dalam dataset ini menunjukkan penyesalan jangka panjang yang didominasi-tidak-bertindak (Gilovich & Medvec 1994; Roese & Summerville 2005). Penggunaan pornografi adalah salah satu dari sedikit domain di mana penyesalan sisi-tindakan mungkin melebihi penyesalan sisi-tidak-bertindak di seluruh populasi, karena tindakan membawa sinyal kesulitan yang dapat diukur (9% saat ini mencoba penghentian) sementara tidak-bertindak tidak membawa sinyal penyesalan yang terdokumentasi dalam literatur penyesalan-seumur-hidup. Ini adalah pola tingkat-populasi; untuk setiap responden individu dengan kesulitan didorong-inkongruensi-moral-tinggi, penyesalan sisi-tindakan mungkin mendominasi, sementara untuk pengguna sesekali non-religius sinyal penyesalan mungkin mendekati nol.
PEMBINGKAIAN MENGASUMSIKAN COUNTERFACTUAL PENGGUNA-RUTIN. Sisi tindakan dimodelkan sebagai "konsumsi rutin (mingguan atau lebih sering)"; di antara orang dewasa AS usia 25+ ini menggambarkan sekitar 20–30% dari populasi umum (Barna memperkirakan 14–21% mingguan, 6–12% setiap hari). Dilema membingkai orang dewasa ini memilih antara mempertahankan pola mereka dan pantang. Untuk pengguna sesekali (1–2 kali per bulan, 13–19% orang dewasa) atau bukan-pengguna (49%), dilema kurang akut. Data perbandingan lintas-nasional tipis: International Sex Survey melaporkan antara 3,2% dan 16,6% orang dewasa memenuhi kriteria penggunaan-pornografi-bermasalah di 42 negara (Bothe et al. 2020 PPCS-6 cut-off), menyarankan populasi setara-penyesalan bervariasi secara substansial menurut konteks nasional.
