本文へスキップ
Likelier

行動 vs. 不行動の後悔

傷つけた相手を許すか、恨みを持ち続けるか

行動した場合

許す

10%

行動しなかった場合

恨みを抱き続ける

33%

それぞれの選択を後で後悔した人の割合。バーと完全な記録は下に表示されます。


ライフスタイル

最終確認 2026-04-26

証拠の質 4.13/5

8次元のレビュー評価。基準は 品質ルーブリック 。各次元は1〜5で評価。

D1 出典の検証
4/5
D2 出典の権威性と独立性
4/5
D3 後悔率の正確性
3/5
D4 出典の比較可能性
3/5
D5 ギロヴィッチ・パターン
5/5
D6 文章の質
5/5
D7 注意事項の完全性
5/5
D8 サンプルの質
4/5
平均 4.13/5
Two hands on opposite sides of a table, one open and relaxed, the other clenched into a fist.
代替データ — この決断に関する直接的な後悔調査は存在しません。比率は後悔を直接尋ねる質問ではなく、満足度スコアとアクセス障壁のデータから導出されています。以下の注意事項を参照してください。

行動への後悔

許す

10%

約10%が許した後に否定的な結果を報告(推定代替指標 — 直接的な後悔測定ではない)

米国成人、全国代表

遡及的、固定期間なし

不作為への後悔

恨みを抱き続ける

33%

33%が恨みを持ち続けることを後悔

世界中の成人、オンラインパネル(国ごとに2,000人)

遡及的、固定期間なし

この選択を後悔した割合

inaction dominates — 不作為が優勢 — 多くは行動しなかったことを後悔しています。

関連する決断

意味的に類似する決断 — 同じ領域、異なるトレードオフ。

lifestyle

謝罪

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が2.0倍高い

lifestyle

縁を切る vs. 友情を維持する

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が1.4倍高い

lifestyle

和解を始める

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が3.3倍高い

lifestyle

友情を保つ vs. 疎遠になる

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が5.9倍高い

lifestyle

変化を受け入れる

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が3.3倍高い

lifestyle

宗教を離れる

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が2.9倍高い

lifestyle

旅行費

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が11.8倍高い

lifestyle

ペットを手放すか飼い続けるか

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が5.7倍高い

33% of adults who hold grudges say they regret doing so, per Trustpilot’s Helping Hands survey of 12,000 adults across six countries. There is no comparable figure for the other side: no large survey has asked whether people regret forgiving. The University of Michigan’s nationally representative survey of 1,423 adults (Toussaint, Williams, Musick and Everson, 2001) found that only 52% said they had forgiven others, and that for adults aged 45 and older forgiving was linked with better self-reported mental and physical health — it reports no regret figure and describes no “small minority” who felt worse after forgiving. The action-side 10% shown here is a placeholder that encodes direction, not a measured rate; it should not be read as evidence that one in ten forgivers regret it. The Trustpilot survey also found 70% “acknowledge” that grudge-holding harms their health, but acknowledgment is not regret — the 33% who explicitly reported regretting their grudges is the more appropriate comparison point.

The physiological case is unusually direct. Witvliet, Ludwig, and Vander Laan (2001) measured 71 participants while they alternated between grudge-rehearsal and forgiveness imagery. Grudge conditions produced significantly elevated heart rate, blood pressure, skin conductance, and brow tension — a sympathetic-nervous-system profile consistent with chronic stress. Rasmussen et al. (2019) confirmed the pattern at scale: across 103 samples totaling 26,043 participants, forgiveness was reliably associated with better psychological and cardiovascular health, though the correlation was modest (r roughly 0.14 to 0.18) and causality remains unestablished.

The main caveat is measurement asymmetry. No major survey has directly asked “Do you regret forgiving?”, and the cited Michigan survey reports no such figure at all — so the action-side 10% is a placeholder, not a measured or inferred rate. The 33% inaction-regret figure is a direct regret question from a consumer panel, not a clinical cohort, and a third of its grudge-holders could not even recall why they were still angry. The directional finding — that grudge-holding generates more regret than forgiving does — is consistent across multiple literatures. The precise magnitude is not established.

出典: 行動

根拠台帳

以下の各数値は各出典が報告した内容であり、引用した原文の抜粋と算出方法を記載しています。リンクをクリックして直接確認できます。

1/2 件の出典が引用元と一字一句一致することを独立して検証済み

  1. [1] University of Michigan / Institute for Social Research — How link between forgiveness and health changes with age
    How link between forgiveness and health changes with age
    統計値
    52% of a nationally representative sample of 1,423 Americans reported forgiving others; forgiveness of others was linked with better self-reported mental and physical health for adults aged 45 and older
    抜粋
    “"Nearly 60 percent of a nationally representative sample of 1,423 Americans report that they have forgiven themselves for past mistakes and wrong-doing... but only 52 percent say they have forgiven others... In those aged 45 and older, forgiving others was linked with better self-reported mental and physical health." ”
    出典データ
    2001-12-11
    アクセス日
    2026-04-26
    計算過程
    University of Michigan nationally representative survey of 1,423 US adults (Toussaint, Williams, Musick & Everson, 2001). The 52% forgave-others rate is verbatim from the ISR release. The study does NOT report any "regret forgiving" figure and describes only positive associations between forgiveness of others and health; it contains no "small minority experiencing negative outcomes" finding. No large-scale survey directly measures regret after forgiving, so the action-side 0.10 is an order-of-magnitude PLACEHOLDER, not a value inferred from any source-stated figure — see proxy_only and caveats. It exists only to preserve the schema's required numeric field and to encode the direction (inaction dominates), not as a calibrated rate.
  2. [2] Psychological Science — Granting forgiveness or harboring grudges: implications for emotion, physiology, and health 検証済み
    Granting forgiveness or harboring grudges: implications for emotion, physiology, and health
    統計値
    Forgiveness imagery produced lower heart rate, blood pressure, skin conductance, and facial EMG compared to grudge rehearsal in 71 participants
    抜粋
    “"Unforgiving thoughts prompted more aversive emotion, and significantly higher corrugator EMG, skin conductance, heart rate, and blood pressure changes from baseline. Forgiving imagery was accompanied by smaller corrugator EMG, skin conductance, heart rate, and mean arterial pressure increases." ”
    出典データ
    2001-03-01
    アクセス日
    2026-04-26
    検証
    グラウンディング監査の際、抜粋を引用元から独立して再取得し、原文と一字一句一致することを確認しました。
    計算過程
    Witvliet, Ludwig & Vander Laan (2001), N=71. Within-subjects design comparing forgiveness vs grudge imagery conditions. Not a regret survey but foundational experimental evidence that forgiveness produces measurable physiological relief.

出典: 不作為

根拠台帳

以下の各数値は各出典が報告した内容であり、引用した原文の抜粋と算出方法を記載しています。リンクをクリックして直接確認できます。

1/2 件の出典が引用元と一字一句一致することを独立して検証済み

  1. [1] Trustpilot / Helping Hands survey — Average adult holds seven grudges, Trustpilot research finds
    Average adult holds seven grudges, Trustpilot research finds
    統計値
    33% of adults surveyed regretted holding grudges; separately, 33% admitted their mental health suffered from ongoing feuds; 70% acknowledged grudge-holding is harmful to health
    抜粋
    “"Around a third admitted their mental health has suffered as a direct result of ongoing feuds — which could partly explain why over a third regret holding grudges. Although 70% acknowledged that it was harmful to their health to hold onto a grudge, about the same percentage admitted to harboring a grudge." ”
    出典データ
    2023-06-15
    アクセス日
    2026-04-26
    計算過程
    Trustpilot Helping Hands survey of 12,000 adults globally (2,000 per country: UK, US, Australia, Netherlands, France, Italy). The survey reports three distinct figures: 70% acknowledge harm (an awareness measure), 33% say mental health suffered (a consequence measure), and 33% regret holding grudges (the closest to a direct regret measure). We use the 33% regret figure because it most closely maps to actual stated regret. This is a consumer panel, not a clinical or academic sample.
  2. [2] Psychology & Health — Meta-analytic connections between forgiveness and health: the moderating effects of forgiveness-related distinctions 検証済み
    Meta-analytic connections between forgiveness and health: the moderating effects of forgiveness-related distinctions
    統計値
    Across 103 samples (N = 26,043), forgiveness was reliably associated with better psychological and physical health; unforgiveness correlated with worse outcomes
    抜粋
    “"The findings provided considerable support to current theorizing about the health benefits of forgiveness. Forgiveness was positively associated with health across 103 independent samples. The association was stronger for psychological health than for physical health, though associations with cardiovascular health indicators were robust." ”
    出典データ
    2019-05-01
    アクセス日
    2026-04-26
    検証
    グラウンディング監査の際、抜粋を引用元から独立して再取得し、原文と一字一句一致することを確認しました。
    計算過程
    Rasmussen et al. (2019) meta-analysis, 103 samples, 606 correlations, N = 26,043. Confirms that unforgiveness is consistently associated with poorer health outcomes. The correlation (r ~ 0.14-0.18) is modest but consistent, and causality is not established.

注意事項

The action-side regret rate is a PLACEHOLDER, not a measured or inferred value. No large-scale survey has directly asked "Do you regret forgiving someone?", and the cited University of Michigan survey does not report any negative-outcome or regret figure for people who forgave — it describes only positive associations between forgiveness of others and health. The 0.10 therefore does not trace to any source-stated statistic; it exists solely to satisfy the schema's required numeric field and to encode the direction (holding a grudge generates more regret than forgiving). Do not read it as a calibrated rate. The inaction-side 33% comes from Trustpilot's Helping Hands consumer panel (12,000 adults globally), which is the more robust figure — it directly asks about grudge regret, though it is a consumer panel rather than a clinical or academic sample. The same survey also found 70% "acknowledge harm" from grudge-holding, but that awareness measure is not regret. The Witvliet et al. (2001) lab study (N=71) is within-subjects and short-duration; chronic grudge physiology is extrapolated, not directly measured over years. The Rasmussen (2019) meta-analytic correlation between forgiveness and health (r ~ 0.14-0.18) is modest in effect size, and causality is not established — healthier people may simply find it easier to forgive. The 3.3:1 ratio should be read as directionally favoring action, not as a precise calibration.

生データ: /api/decisions.json

このデバイスで最近見た項目