本文へスキップ
Likelier

行動 vs. 不行動の後悔

旅行に使うか貯金するか

行動した場合

旅行にお金を使う

6.0%

行動しなかった場合

旅行せずにお金を貯める

71%

それぞれの選択を後で後悔した人の割合。バーと完全な記録は下に表示されます。


ライフスタイル

最終確認 2026-04-25

証拠の質 3.88/5

8次元のレビュー評価。基準は 品質ルーブリック 。各次元は1〜5で評価。

D1 出典の検証
4/5
D2 出典の権威性と独立性
3/5
D3 後悔率の正確性
3/5
D4 出典の比較可能性
2/5
D5 ギロヴィッチ・パターン
5/5
D6 文章の質
5/5
D7 注意事項の完全性
5/5
D8 サンプルの質
4/5
平均 3.88/5
Two identical suitcases side by side, one open and covered with destination stickers, the other closed and dusty.

行動への後悔

旅行にお金を使う

6.0%

6%が旅行への支出を後悔

米国成人、オンラインパネル

遡及的、固定期間なし

不作為への後悔

旅行せずにお金を貯める

71%

71%が逃した旅行機会を後悔

32か国のグローバル旅行者

遡及的、固定期間なし

この選択を後悔した割合

inaction dominates — 不作為が優勢 — 多くは行動しなかったことを後悔しています。

関連する決断

意味的に類似する決断 — 同じ領域、異なるトレードオフ。

金融

投資

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が3.2倍高い

金融

自宅リフォーム

この選択を後悔した割合

行動が優勢

行動の後悔が2.3倍高い

金融直接

老後貯蓄の時期

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が11.0倍高い

lifestyle

EV vs ガソリン車

この選択を後悔した割合

行動が優勢

行動の後悔が2.9倍高い

lifestyle

有機対従来型

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が3.1倍高い

lifestyle

飲酒後の配車 vs 運転

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が5.7倍高い

金融直接

住宅購入

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が5.6倍高い

金融

早期投資

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が3.2倍高い

71% of travelers worldwide report regretting missed travel opportunities, per Booking.com’s survey of 20,500 people across 32 countries. On the action side, only 6% of adults regret the money they spent on travel, according to a Claris Finance survey of 2,000 adults reported by Money — one of the lowest action-regret rates for any major spending category. The resulting 12:1 ratio makes this the strongest regret asymmetry in the dataset, and one of the cleanest confirmations of Gilovich and Medvec’s inaction-dominance finding.

The psychological mechanism is well-documented. Van Boven and Gilovich (2003) showed that experiential purchases generate more lasting satisfaction than material ones, partly because experiences become part of identity and are psychologically protected from regret. Travel is the canonical experiential purchase. Even trips that went badly tend to become good stories; money saved by not traveling generates no narrative at all. Among adults over 70, Explore Worldwide found that 62% regretted missing at least one dream destination — confirming that this regret does not fade with age but, if anything, intensifies.

The main caveat is sample bias. Booking.com’s respondents are people interested enough in travel to be on a travel platform, inflating the inaction-regret rate. The true population rate for travel regret among all adults — including those with no interest in travel — is certainly lower than 71%. Similarly, the 6% action-regret figure may be deflated by the “rosy retrospection” effect, where people systematically remember experiences more positively than they were. The directional finding (travel regret overwhelmingly favors action) is robust; the magnitude should be read as an upper bound.

出典: 行動

根拠台帳

以下の各数値は各出典が報告した内容であり、引用した原文の抜粋と算出方法を記載しています。リンクをクリックして直接確認できます。

1/2 件の出典が引用元と一字一句一致することを独立して検証済み

  1. [1] Money / Claris Finance survey — These Are Americans' Biggest Financial Regrets 検証済み
    These Are Americans' Biggest Financial Regrets
    統計値
    Among all age groups, only 6% regretted the money they spent traveling; close to 20% said they traveled a lot and had no regrets
    抜粋
    “"Among all age groups, only 6% regretted the money they spent traveling, while close to 20% said they traveled 'a lot' and had no regrets. A new survey of 2,000 adults by Claris Finance." ”
    出典データ
    2019-09-15
    アクセス日
    2026-04-25
    検証
    グラウンディング監査の際、抜粋を引用元から独立して再取得し、原文と一字一句一致することを確認しました。
    計算過程
    Claris Finance survey of 2,000 adults, reported by Money (money.com). The 6% figure represents those who specifically regretted the financial outlay on travel. This is one of the lowest action-regret rates in any spending category.
  2. [2] Bankrate — Travel Vs. Savings: Many Americans Are Prioritizing Wanderlust Amid Economic Uncertainty
    Travel Vs. Savings: Many Americans Are Prioritizing Wanderlust Amid Economic Uncertainty
    統計値
    Americans increasingly prioritize travel spending even amid economic uncertainty; regret about travel expenditure is rare
    抜粋
    “"Many Americans are prioritizing travel even amid economic uncertainty. Survey data consistently shows that experiential spending — particularly travel — generates less regret than material purchases." ”
    出典データ
    2023-08-14
    アクセス日
    2026-04-25
    計算過程
    Bankrate contextual reporting. Corroborates that travel spending regret is unusually low compared to other discretionary categories.

出典: 不作為

根拠台帳

以下の各数値は各出典が報告した内容であり、引用した原文の抜粋と算出方法を記載しています。リンクをクリックして直接確認できます。

  1. [1] Booking.com — Younger generations are most regretful about missed travel opportunities
    Younger generations are most regretful about missed travel opportunities
    統計値
    71% of global travelers regret having missed opportunities to travel in their lives
    抜粋
    “"A study by Booking.com has revealed that up to 71% of travellers around the world regret having missed opportunities to travel in their lives. The most common regrets: not traveling more often (46%), not traveling more when younger (35%), not visiting more of the countries traveled to (29%)." ”
    出典データ
    2022-11-02
    アクセス日
    2026-04-25
    計算過程
    Booking.com surveyed 20,500 people across 32 countries. The 71% includes all forms of travel-opportunity regret, not just financial trade-offs. We use it as the inaction-regret rate because the core sentiment is "I should have traveled more."
  2. [2] NZ Herald / Explore Worldwide — Biggest travel regrets of people over 70 revealed in survey
    Biggest travel regrets of people over 70 revealed in survey
    統計値
    62% of people over 70 regretted missing out on visiting at least one dream destination
    抜粋
    “"62 per cent of people over the age of 70 regretted missing out on visiting at least one dream destination. Travel regret persists and even intensifies in old age." ”
    出典データ
    2023-03-15
    アクセス日
    2026-04-25
    計算過程
    Explore Worldwide survey of adults over 70. The 62% among elderly respondents confirms that travel inaction regret does not fade with time — consistent with Gilovich's temporal pattern.

注意事項

INDUSTRY-FUNDING BIAS: Both primary sources have financial interests in promoting travel. Booking.com is a travel booking platform; its 71% inaction-regret figure comes from surveying travelers on its own platform, a population pre-selected for travel interest. Claris Finance is a financial services company; its 6% action-regret figure comes from a survey likely designed to frame travel spending as low-regret. No independent academic study was found that measures both travel-spending regret and travel-forgoing regret in the same population. The action and inaction figures come from different surveys with different populations (US adults vs global travelers across 32 countries). The Claris Finance 6% is also likely deflated by experiential-purchase bias: people psychologically protect memories of experiences more than material goods (Van Boven & Gilovich, 2003). The Bankrate contextual source does not provide a specific regret percentage. The 12:1 ratio is the most extreme in the dataset and should be interpreted as directionally suggestive rather than precisely calibrated — the true ratio is almost certainly smaller once industry-selection bias is accounted for.

生データ: /api/decisions.json

このデバイスで最近見た項目