本文へスキップ
Likelier

行動 vs. 不行動の後悔

子どものLifeを定期的にSNSに投稿するか、デジタルプライバシーを守るか

行動した場合

子どもの日常を日常的にSNSで共有する(シェアレンティング)

52%

行動しなかった場合

子どものデジタルプライバシーを守りSNSに出さない

8.0%

それぞれの選択を後で後悔した人の割合。バーと完全な記録は下に表示されます。


家族

最終確認 2026-05-13

証拠の質 4.38/5

8次元のレビュー評価。基準は 品質ルーブリック 。各次元は1〜5で評価。

D1 出典の検証
4/5
D2 出典の権威性と独立性
5/5
D3 後悔率の正確性
5/5
D4 出典の比較可能性
4/5
D5 ギロヴィッチ・パターン
4/5
D6 文章の質
4/5
D7 注意事項の完全性
4/5
D8 サンプルの質
5/5
平均 4.38/5
A smartphone showing a child's photo post beside a privacy padlock symbol on a plain background
代替データ — この決断に関する直接的な後悔調査は存在しません。比率は後悔を直接尋ねる質問ではなく、満足度スコアとアクセス障壁のデータから導出されています。以下の注意事項を参照してください。

行動への後悔

子どもの日常を日常的にSNSで共有する(シェアレンティング)

52%

親の52%が、共有した内容によって子どもが大きくなったときに恥ずかしい思いをすることを懸念している(懸念のプロキシであり、測定された後悔ではない)

ソーシャルメディアで定期的に子の写真や動画を投稿する米国親

横断的、2015年

不作為への後悔

子どものデジタルプライバシーを守りSNSに出さない

8.0%

プライバシーを守る親の後悔を測る調査はない。示されている約8%は測定された率ではなく、埋め合わせのプレースホルダーである

ソーシャルメディアで子に関する投稿を積極的に制限または回避する米国親

横断的、2019年

この選択を後悔した割合

action dominates — 行動が優勢 — 多くは行動したことを後悔しています。

関連する決断

意味的に類似する決断 — 同じ領域、異なるトレードオフ。

family直接

子どものSNSアカウントへのアクセス

この選択を後悔した割合

行動が優勢

行動の後悔が5.4倍高い

lifestyle

繊細な話を公開 vs. プライベートに保つ

この選択を後悔した割合

行動が優勢

行動の後悔が2.4倍高い

family

自由放任 vs. 過保護な子育て

この選択を後悔した割合

行動が優勢

行動の後悔が2.3倍高い

family

助ける vs. 自力で乗り越えさせる

この選択を後悔した割合

行動が優勢

行動の後悔が1.2倍高い

family

私立 vs 公立

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が3.2倍高い

family

しつけ vs. 寛容

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が2.4倍高い

family

甘やかす vs. 自制する

この選択を後悔した割合

行動が優勢

行動の後悔が2.9倍高い

family

家族の食事

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が6.9倍高い

Among US parents of children age four and under, 52% are concerned their child might be embarrassed when older by what is shared about them on social media, and roughly two-thirds are concerned about private information (68%) or photos (67%) being found, according to the C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital National Poll on Children’s Health (fielded 2014, n=569). These are concerns about a hypothetical future, not retrospective regret, and they coexist with continued sharing: a 2020 Pew Research Center survey found that 82% of social-media-using parents have posted photos, videos, or information about their children, yet only 16% say they worry sometimes or often that their child will later be upset about it. On the inaction side, no published survey directly asks non-sharing parents whether they regret their restraint. The ~8% shown for that side is an imputed placeholder, not a measured rate; the entry is flagged as a proxy comparison.

The decision differs structurally from most regret pairs because its full consequences unfold over years, not weeks. A child photographed extensively in infancy cannot consent and may, at age 12 or 16, discover years of publicly archived posts depicting their private developmental milestones, childhood embarrassments, or medical experiences. Once content is indexed, screenshot, or held by third-party data brokers, deletion from the original platform does not reliably remove it. The Mott Poll was fielded in late 2014, before the normalization of Stories, Reels, and TikTok — current sharenting rates are substantially higher, and the volume of archived content per child has grown accordingly.

Gilovich and Medvec’s temporal asymmetry research predicts that action regrets are more vivid in the short term but that inaction regrets accumulate over time. Sharenting is unusual in that the short-term feedback is consistently positive (social validation, likes, grandparent engagement) while the long-term cost accrues to the child, not the parent. This feedback mismatch — positive reinforcement at time of posting, negative consequence to a third party years later — may cause parents to systematically underestimate action-side regret at the moment of decision and encounter it only retrospectively, when the child is old enough to object.

出典: 行動

根拠台帳

以下の各数値は各出典が報告した内容であり、引用した原文の抜粋と算出方法を記載しています。リンクをクリックして直接確認できます。

1/2 件の出典が引用元と一字一句一致することを独立して検証済み

  1. [1] C.S. Mott Children's Hospital National Poll on Children's Health — Parents on Social Media: Likes and Dislikes of Sharenting
    Parents on Social Media: Likes and Dislikes of Sharenting
    統計値
    52% of parents are concerned that, when older, their child might be embarrassed about what has been shared on social media; 68% are concerned about private information about their child being found, and 67% about photos being shared
    抜粋
    “"More than two-thirds of parents are concerned about someone finding out private information about their child (68%) or sharing photos of their child (67%). Over half (52%) are concerned that, when older, their child might be embarrassed about what is shared on social media." ”
    出典データ
    2015-03-16
    アクセス日
    2026-06-30
    計算過程
    C.S. Mott Children's Hospital National Poll on Children's Health, Vol. 23 Issue 2 ("Parents on Social Media: Likes and Dislikes of Sharenting"), survey fielded November/December 2014, N=569 parents of children age 4 and under. Nationally representative US sample. The 52% captures parents concerned that their child might be embarrassed about shared content when older -- the side label is a forward-looking concern about future embarrassment, not a direct "I regret what I posted" question. The 0.52 numeral is the poll's verbatim embarrassment-concern reading but is a concern proxy, not measured regret.
  2. [2] Pew Research Center — Parents' attitudes -- and experiences -- related to digital technology 検証済み
    Parents' attitudes -- and experiences -- related to digital technology
    統計値
    82% of parents who use social media have posted photos, videos or other information about their children on these sites; 16% say they sometimes or often worry their children might be upset in the future about what was posted (83% rarely or never worry)
    抜粋
    “"82% of parents who use social media say they have posted photos, videos or other information about their children on these sites. ... The majority of parents who share photos, videos and information about their children on social media say they rarely or never (83%) worry that in the future their children might be upset about the things they posted about them on social media sites. Just 16% say they worry about this sometimes or often." ”
    出典データ
    2020-07-28
    アクセス日
    2026-06-30
    検証
    グラウンディング監査の際、抜粋を引用元から独立して再取得し、原文と一字一句一致することを確認しました。
    計算過程
    Pew Research Center, "Parenting Children in the Age of Screens" (American Trends Panel Wave 63, fielded March 2-15, 2020). Documents that sharenting is near-universal among social-media-using parents (82% have posted about their children) while only a 16% minority worry sometimes/often that their child will later be upset -- a lower self-reported worry rate than the Mott concern figures. Used as corroborating evidence on the action side, not in rate arithmetic.

出典: 不作為

根拠台帳

以下の各数値は各出典が報告した内容であり、引用した原文の抜粋と算出方法を記載しています。リンクをクリックして直接確認できます。

  1. [1] Pew Research Center — Parenting Children in the Age of Screens
    Parenting Children in the Age of Screens

    See all 2 Likelier entries citing this source →

    統計値
    Among parents whose under-12 child uses a voice-activated assistant, about 39% are at least somewhat concerned about the data the assistant collects about their child (11% very concerned)
    抜粋
    “"About four-in-ten parents of a child age 11 or younger who uses or interacts with a voice-activated assistant (39%) say they are at least somewhat concerned about the data these assistants collect about their child, including 11% who say they are very concerned." ”
    出典データ
    2020-07-28
    アクセス日
    2026-06-30
    計算過程
    Pew Research Center, "Parenting Children in the Age of Screens" (American Trends Panel Wave 63, fielded March 2-15, 2020). This source documents that parental concern about child data collection is real but partial (39% concerned about voice-assistant data among the relevant subgroup) -- it establishes the motivation behind privacy protection. It does NOT measure regret among privacy-protective parents. No published survey asks non-sharing parents whether they regret their restraint, so the inaction side carries no reliable regret estimate (see regret_display).

注意事項

Both rates on this entry are proxies, not measured regret -- the entry is flagged proxy_only. The action-side figure captures parental CONCERN, not retrospective regret: 52% of parents in the C.S. Mott poll said they were concerned their child might be embarrassed when older by what is shared, and the same poll found 68%/67% concerned about private information or photos. These are forward-looking worries, not "I regret specific posts" answers, and many parents who voiced them kept sharing (Pew finds 82% of social-media-using parents have posted about their children, yet only 16% worry sometimes or often that their child will later be upset). The inaction-side 8% is NOT a measured rate: no published survey asks privacy-protective parents whether they regret their restraint, so the numeral is an imputed placeholder retained only because the schema requires a number -- treat the inaction side as having no reliable regret estimate. A distinctive feature of this decision is that regret may intensify as the child ages: children photographed extensively in early childhood cannot consent to their digital footprint and may later object to years of publicly archived posts. Content posted to platforms between 2010 and 2025 is likely to persist indefinitely even after deletion, given archiving, screenshots, and third-party data brokers. The Mott Poll was conducted in 2015, before the widespread normalization of Instagram Stories, TikTok, and BeReal-style spontaneous sharing -- sharenting rates and subsequent concerns have likely increased since then.

生データ: /api/decisions.json

このデバイスで最近見た項目