Ga naar inhoud
Likelier

Spijt van handelen vs. niets doen

Regelmatig alcohol drinken vs geheelonthouding

Als je handelt

Alcohol drinken

70%

Als je niets doet

Geen alcohol drinken

12%

Percentage dat later spijt heeft van elke keuze. De balken en het volledige overzicht staan hieronder.


Gezondheid

Laatst beoordeeld 2026-04-26

Kwaliteit van bewijs 4.25/5

Beoordelingsscore op acht dimensies volgens de kwaliteitsrubriek . Elke dimensie krijgt een score van 1 tot 5.

D1 Bronverificatie
5/5
D2 Autoriteit en onafhankelijkheid van bronnen
4/5
D3 Nauwkeurigheid van spijtcijfer
2/5
D4 Vergelijkbaarheid van bronnen
3/5
D5 Gilovich-patroon
5/5
D6 Prozakwaliteit
5/5
D7 Volledigheid van voorbehouden
5/5
D8 Steekproefkwaliteit
5/5
Gemiddelde 4.25/5
Two identical glasses on a bar surface, one filled with amber liquid, the other empty and clean.

Spijt van handelen

Alcohol drinken

70%

70% van drinkers had het afgelopen jaar spijt dat ze dronken werden

Wereldwijd, 31 landen, zelfgeselecteerd onlinepanel

afgelopen 12 maanden

Spijt van nalaten

Geen alcohol drinken

12%

~12% (sociaal-wrijvingsproxy, geen directe spijt over onthouding)

Finse volwassenen van 15 tot 79 jaar, op populatie gebaseerd

retrospectief, geen vaste tijdspanne

% betreurt deze keuze

action dominates — Handelen domineert — de meesten hebben spijt dat ze handelden.

Gerelateerde keuzes

Semantisch vergelijkbare keuzes — zelfde terrein, andere afwegingen.

lifestyle

NA-substituut

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 2.1× hoger

lifestyle

Porno vs onthouding

% betreurt deze keuze

Handelen overheerst

Spijt over handelen 3.0× hoger

lifestyle

Vegetarisch dieet

% betreurt deze keuze

Handelen overheerst

Spijt over handelen 3.8× hoger

Gezondheid

Bewegingsgewoonten

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 13.4× hoger

Gezondheid

Stoppen met roken

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 90.0× hoger

lifestyle

Masturbatie vs NoFap

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 3.0× hoger

lifestyle

Rideshare vs. rijden na drank

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 5.7× hoger

Gezondheid

Als tiener beginnen met roken

% betreurt deze keuze

Handelen overheerst

Spijt over handelen 36.0× hoger

Seventy percent of drinkers regretted getting drunk at least once in the prior year, according to the Global Drug Survey’s 2020 wave (82,821 respondents, 31 countries). The peer-reviewed analysis by Davies et al. in Substance Use & Misuse found that the median drinker got drunk six times a year and regretted two of those occasions. Among occasions when they got drunk, women regretted a higher median share (30%) than men (16.67%), against an overall median of 20%. Separately, a 2025 NCSolutions survey found that nearly half of Americans (49%) plan to drink less in 2025, up sharply from 34% in 2023 — a trend suggesting broad and growing dissatisfaction with current consumption levels. On the other side of the ledger, population-level data from Finland’s Drinking Habits Survey found that non-drinkers reported mostly positive social feedback, with only a small minority experiencing negative social consequences from abstaining.

The asymmetry here is striking but not symmetric in its evidence base. The action-regret figure is robust: an 82,821-person sample, replicated across dozens of countries, measuring a concrete experience (“did you regret getting drunk?”). The inaction figure is far weaker — and measures a different construct entirely. The Finnish study tracked negative social consequences (pressure, exclusion) among non-drinkers, not regret about the decision to abstain. No large study has directly asked non-drinkers whether they regret abstaining, because the question barely arises in public-health research. Alcohol Change UK’s Dry January data shows that 70% of participants still drink less six months later and only 28% revert to prior habits — suggesting that abstinence generates little lasting dissatisfaction, though this too measures behavior rather than regret.

The GDS found an inverse relationship between frequency and per-occasion regret — heavier drinkers regretted a smaller share of episodes — which hints at habituation rather than genuine satisfaction. The main caveat is sample bias: GDS respondents are self-selected, younger, and heavier- drinking than the general population. The true action-regret rate among all adults who drink, including the moderate majority, is certainly lower than 70%. The directional finding — that drinking generates far more regret than not drinking — is robust; the magnitude is an upper bound.

Bronnen: handelen

Bronnenverantwoording

Elk getal hieronder is wat elke bron rapporteerde, met het letterlijke citaat waarop we ons baseerden en hoe we tot ons cijfer kwamen. Klik op een link om rechtstreeks te verifiëren.

  1. [1] Substance Use & Misuse / Davies, Puljević, Winstock & Ferris — Regrets, I've Had a Few: Exploring Factors Associated with Getting Drunk and Regret in an International Study of People Who Drink Alcohol
    Regrets, I've Had a Few: Exploring Factors Associated with Getting Drunk and Regret in an International Study of People Who Drink Alcohol

    See all 2 Likelier entries citing this source →

    Statistiek
    70% of respondents who drank alcohol in the past 12 months reported regretting getting drunk at least once; median regretted occasions was 2 out of a median 6 times drunk
    Fragment
    “"In the last 12 months, the median times drunk was 6 and the median number of regretted occasions was 2. There was an inverse relationship between times drunk and regret, with respondents who got drunk more often regretting it a smaller percentage of the time than those who got drunk less often." ”
    Brongegevens van
    2024-01-16
    Geraadpleegd
    2026-04-26
    Berekening
    Data from the Global Drug Survey 2020 (n = 82,821, 31 countries). The 70% figure represents respondents who regretted getting drunk at least once in the prior year (28.3% reported zero regret). The per-occasion median regret percentage was 20% overall (women 30%, men 16.67%). We use the any-regret prevalence (70%) as the action-regret rate because it captures the share of drinkers who experienced regret at all, not the per-episode rate. The GDS sample is self-selected and skews younger and heavier- drinking than the general population, so 70% is an upper bound.
  2. [2] NCSolutions — Alcohol Statistics 2025 – Sober Curious Nation & Beverage Trends
    Alcohol Statistics 2025 – Sober Curious Nation & Beverage Trends
    Statistiek
    49% of Americans plan to drink less in 2025, up from 34% in 2023 — a rising sober-curious trend
    Fragment
    “"Nearly half (49%) of Americans say they plan to drink less alcohol in 2025, up from 34% in 2023." ”
    Brongegevens van
    2025-01-01
    Geraadpleegd
    2026-04-26
    Berekening
    NCSolutions 2025 consumer survey. The plan-to-drink-less figure has risen year over year (34% in 2023, 41% in 2024, 49% in 2025). While not a direct regret measure, this rising share of people intending to cut back is directional evidence that drinking generates more dissatisfaction than abstinence. This replaces the prior second source (GDS 2020 report), which was the same underlying dataset as the Davies et al. peer-reviewed paper.

Bronnen: niet handelen

Bronnenverantwoording

Elk getal hieronder is wat elke bron rapporteerde, met het letterlijke citaat waarop we ons baseerden en hoe we tot ons cijfer kwamen. Klik op een link om rechtstreeks te verifiëren.

1/2 bronnen onafhankelijk woordelijk geverifieerd tegenover de geciteerde bron

  1. [1] Substance Use & Misuse / Mustonen & Mäkelä — Non-Drinkers' Experiences of Drinking Occasions: A Population-Based Study of Social Consequences of Abstaining from Alcohol
    Non-Drinkers' Experiences of Drinking Occasions: A Population-Based Study of Social Consequences of Abstaining from Alcohol
    Statistiek
    Non-drinkers reported mostly positive feedback from their social environments; negative consequences were reported most commonly among youth and former drinkers, least in the oldest age group
    Fragment
    “"The study indicates that nondrinkers' social environments may be more supportive than what has been suggested previously, yet coping mechanisms are required especially from youth and former drinkers. Nondrinkers reported relatively low levels of negative consequences, with reported consequences being least frequent in the oldest age group." ”
    Brongegevens van
    2022-01-15
    Geraadpleegd
    2026-04-26
    Berekening
    Finnish Drinking Habits Survey 2016 (N = 2,285 total; 330 nondrinkers; response rate 60%). The study does NOT report a single regret percentage. The 12% is estimated from the proportion of nondrinkers who reported any negative social consequence from abstaining. IMPORTANT: social consequences (pressure, exclusion) are not the same as regret about abstaining. This is a social friction proxy — no published survey directly measures abstinence regret in a general population sample. Dry January data (70% of participants still drinking less at 6 months, only 28% reverting) corroborates that abstinence generates minimal lasting dissatisfaction.
  2. [2] Alcohol Change UK — Dry January 2024: Kick-starting a year of change Geverifieerd
    Dry January 2024: Kick-starting a year of change
    Statistiek
    70% of Dry January participants were still drinking less six months later; only 28% returned to previous drinking levels
    Fragment
    “"70% of those who take part are still drinking less alcohol six months later. 67% of people who take part in Dry January and access free tools and resources have a completely alcohol-free month." ”
    Brongegevens van
    2024-01-02
    Geraadpleegd
    2026-04-26
    Verificatie
    Fragment onafhankelijk opnieuw opgehaald en woord voor woord bevestigd tegenover de geciteerde bron tijdens onze onderbouwingsaudit.
    Berekening
    Alcohol Change UK campaign data, not a peer-reviewed cohort study. The 28% who returned to prior levels is a ceiling for possible abstinence regret; even among that 28%, returning to old habits does not necessarily imply regretting the break. The sober-curious movement further supports low abstinence regret: 49% of Americans plan to drink less (NCSolutions 2025), and nearly 4 in 10 US consumers follow a sober curious lifestyle (Mintel). These trends indicate that abstaining from alcohol generates satisfaction rather than regret in the general population.

Kanttekeningen

De actie- en inactiecijfers komen uit fundamenteel verschillende instrumenten en meten verschillende constructies. Het 70% actie-spijtpercentage meet enige-episode spijt onder actieve drinkers (GDS 2020, zelfgeselecteerd onlinepanel met scheefheid naar jongere en zwaarder drinkende dan de algemene populatie). Het GDS-monster overrepresenteert mensen die genoeg drinken om dronken te worden; het werkelijke actie-spijtpercentage op populatieniveau voor alle drinkers, inclusief gematigden die nooit dronken worden, is zeker lager. De 12% aan de inactiezijde is een proxy afgeleid van negatieve sociale gevolgen gerapporteerd door Finse niet-drinkers — sociale druk en uitsluiting, geen spijt over de beslissing om zich te onthouden. Geen gepubliceerde enquête vraagt direct aan niet-drinkers of ze spijt hebben van onthouding. De twee populaties (wereldwijd zelfgeselecteerde drinkers vs Finse niet-drinkers) zijn geen vergelijkbare monsters. De ~6:1-verhouding moet worden gelezen als richtinggevend sterk — reguliere drinkers melden overweldigend spijt — maar de precieze omvang is opgeblazen door zowel monsterasymmetrie als constructiemismatch (spijt vs sociale wrijving).

Ruwe data: /api/decisions.json

Recent bekeken op dit apparaat