本文へスキップ
Likelier

行動 vs. 不行動の後悔

SNSを続けるか、アカウントを削除するか

行動した場合

SNSを使い続ける

45%

行動しなかった場合

SNSアカウントを削除する

14%

それぞれの選択を後で後悔した人の割合。バーと完全な記録は下に表示されます。


ライフスタイル

最終確認 2026-04-26

証拠の質 3.75/5

8次元のレビュー評価。基準は 品質ルーブリック 。各次元は1〜5で評価。

D1 出典の検証
4/5
D2 出典の権威性と独立性
3/5
D3 後悔率の正確性
2/5
D4 出典の比較可能性
3/5
D5 ギロヴィッチ・パターン
5/5
D6 文章の質
5/5
D7 注意事項の完全性
5/5
D8 サンプルの質
3/5
平均 3.75/5
A smartphone screen split down the middle, one half glowing with notification badges, the other half dark and silent.
代替データ — この決断に関する直接的な後悔調査は存在しません。比率は後悔を直接尋ねる質問ではなく、満足度スコアとアクセス障壁のデータから導出されています。以下の注意事項を参照してください。

行動への後悔

SNSを使い続ける

45%

45%が、若い頃のSNSの多用を後悔している

アジア太平洋地域の成人、オンラインパネル(アクティブなソーシャルメディアユーザー)

遡及的、固定期間なし

不作為への後悔

SNSアカウントを削除する

14%

Facebookを削除した人の約14%は幸福感に変化がなかったと報告した(0%が不幸せになった)——満足度が中立という上限であり、測定された後悔ではない

Facebookを削除または非アクティブ化した米国成人

遡及的、固定期間なし

この選択を後悔した割合

action dominates — 行動が優勢 — 多くは行動したことを後悔しています。

関連する決断

意味的に類似する決断 — 同じ領域、異なるトレードオフ。

lifestyle

繊細な話を公開 vs. プライベートに保つ

この選択を後悔した割合

行動が優勢

行動の後悔が2.4倍高い

lifestyle

EV vs ガソリン車

この選択を後悔した割合

行動が優勢

行動の後悔が2.9倍高い

lifestyle

宗教を離れる

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が2.9倍高い

lifestyle

地元を離れる

この選択を後悔した割合

不作為が優勢

不作為の後悔が1.5倍高い

family直接

子どものSNSアカウントへのアクセス

この選択を後悔した割合

行動が優勢

行動の後悔が5.4倍高い

lifestyle

菜食主義

この選択を後悔した割合

行動が優勢

行動の後悔が3.8倍高い

lifestyle

意思決定に人工知能を活用

この選択を後悔した割合

均衡

ほぼ均衡

lifestyle

ポルノ視聴 vs 禁欲

この選択を後悔した割合

行動が優勢

行動の後悔が3.0倍高い

Nearly 45% of adults who are active on social media say they regret how much they used it when they were younger, according to a Kaspersky survey of 1,240 working professionals across six Asia-Pacific countries (Australia, India, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Vietnam). On the other side, Security.org’s survey of 1,012 US adults found that roughly 14% of those who deleted Facebook reported no change in happiness afterward, 86% described themselves as happier, and 0% said they were less happy. That survey never asks “do you regret deleting?”, so the true deletion-regret rate it implies is closer to zero than to 14% — the ~14% is the satisfaction-neutral group, a conservative ceiling rather than a measured regret rate. The implied ratio favors deletion, but the comparison is imprecise: one survey measures retrospective volume regret among current users, the other measures post-deletion mood among a self-selected group of quitters.

The strongest experimental evidence comes from Hunt, Marx, Lipson, and Young (2018) at the University of Pennsylvania. In a randomized controlled trial, 143 undergraduates were assigned to either limit Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat to 10 minutes per platform per day or use social media as usual for three weeks. The limited-use group showed significant reductions in loneliness and depression compared to controls over the three weeks. This is one of the few studies establishing a causal (not merely correlational) link between social media reduction and improved well-being.

The main weakness in framing this as a clean action-vs-inaction pair is that “deleting social media” is rarely a permanent, total act. Many deleters migrate to other platforms, reactivate after a few months, or simply reduce usage without full deletion. The Security.org survey focused exclusively on Facebook, not all social media. The Kaspersky figure applies to Asia-Pacific professionals, not a globally representative sample. What the data does suggest, directionally, is that sustained heavy use generates more stated regret than leaving does — a finding corroborated by Hunt et al.’s experimental evidence that reduction causes genuine well-being improvement.

出典: 行動

根拠台帳

以下の各数値は各出典が報告した内容であり、引用した原文の抜粋と算出方法を記載しています。リンクをクリックして直接確認できます。

1/2 件の出典が引用元と一字一句一致することを独立して検証済み

  1. [1] Cyber Magazine / Kaspersky — 45% of people regret using social media in younger years 検証済み
    45% of people regret using social media in younger years
    統計値
    45% of respondents regret using social media as much as they did when they were younger
    抜粋
    “"45 percent of people regret using social media as much as they did when they were younger. Old social posts can present challenges with job applications and progression." ”
    出典データ
    2020-09-15
    アクセス日
    2026-04-26
    検証
    グラウンディング監査の際、抜粋を引用元から独立して再取得し、原文と一字一句一致することを確認しました。
    計算過程
    Kaspersky Digital Reputation Economy survey conducted by YouGov in November 2020 across six Asia-Pacific countries (Australia, India, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Vietnam), n = 1,240 working professionals who use social media at least 1 hour/day. The 45% figure captures retrospective regret about volume of past social media use, not current-session regret. Population is Asia-Pacific, not global — earlier descriptions of this as a "global" survey were inaccurate.
  2. [2] Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology — No More FOMO: Limiting Social Media Decreases Loneliness and Depression
    No More FOMO: Limiting Social Media Decreases Loneliness and Depression
    統計値
    Limiting social media to 30 minutes/day significantly reduced loneliness and depression over 3 weeks compared to unrestricted use
    抜粋
    “"The limited use group showed significant reductions in loneliness and depression over three weeks compared to the control group." ”
    出典データ
    2018-11-01
    アクセス日
    2026-04-26
    計算過程
    Hunt, Marx, Lipson & Young (2018), University of Pennsylvania. 143 undergraduates randomized to limit Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat to 10 min each/day vs use-as-usual for 3 weeks. Limited-use group showed significant reductions in loneliness and depression. Provides experimental evidence that reduced use improves well-being, supporting the action-side regret finding. Does not provide a binary regret rate itself.

出典: 不作為

根拠台帳

以下の各数値は各出典が報告した内容であり、引用した原文の抜粋と算出方法を記載しています。リンクをクリックして直接確認できます。

1/2 件の出典が引用元と一字一句一致することを独立して検証済み

  1. [1] Security.org — Detailing the Delete Facebook Phenomenon 検証済み
    Detailing the Delete Facebook Phenomenon
    統計値
    Of those who deleted/deactivated Facebook: 45.6% significantly happier, 40.5% slightly happier, 13.9% neither more nor less happy, 0% less happy. The survey measures happiness change, not regret.
    抜粋
    “"Nearly half of them (46 percent) said they were significantly happier after getting rid of Facebook, while 41 percent said it made them slightly happier." ”
    出典データ
    2021-01-15
    アクセス日
    2026-04-26
    検証
    グラウンディング監査の際、抜粋を引用元から独立して再取得し、原文と一字一句一致することを確認しました。
    計算過程
    Security.org surveyed 1,012 US adults who had ever held a Facebook account. Among those who deleted or deactivated, the happiness breakdown was: 45.6% significantly happier, 40.5% slightly happier (86% happier total), 13.9% neither more nor less happy, and 0% less happy (0% slightly less + 0% significantly less). The survey asks ONLY about happiness change — it never asks "do you regret deleting?" Because 0% reported being less happy, the true deletion-regret rate implied by this data is near zero, not 14%. The ~14% we surface is the satisfaction-NEUTRAL group used as a conservative ceiling on the share who felt no benefit — a proxy, not a measured regret rate (hence proxy_only: true). Note: article was updated/republished in 2025 but original data collection was 2021.
  2. [2] University of Michigan / Michigan Medicine — Many young people recognize negative impact of social media and have considered deleting accounts
    Many young people recognize negative impact of social media and have considered deleting accounts
    統計値
    More than half of 14-24-year-olds have deleted or thought about deleting social media accounts due to bullying, misinformation, safety risks, and distressing content
    抜粋
    “"More than half of respondents ages 14-24 said they've deleted or thought about deleting accounts. Reasons include bullying, misinformation, safety risks, fakeness and distressing content." ”
    出典データ
    2022-11-01
    アクセス日
    2026-04-26
    計算過程
    University of Michigan C.S. Mott Children's Hospital National Poll on Children's Health, November 2022. Over 50% of young people have deleted or considered deleting accounts. Corroborates that deletion intent is common and driven by negative experiences, not impulsive decisions likely to generate regret.

注意事項

The action and inaction figures come from different surveys with different populations and different operationalizations of "regret." The Kaspersky 45% measures retrospective regret about past usage volume among Asia-Pacific working professionals (not "global" as previously described — the survey was conducted by YouGov in six Asia-Pacific countries in November 2020). The Security.org ~14% is an imputed ceiling: it is the satisfaction-neutral group ("neither more nor less happy", 13.9%) from a happiness measure among US Facebook deleters — not a direct regret question. Critically, 0% of deleters said they were less happy, so the true deletion-regret rate implied by the data is near zero; the ~14% is a conservative upper bound on the share who felt no benefit, carried as a proxy (proxy_only: true). These are different constructs (stated regret about volume vs happiness change after deletion) measured on different populations (Asia-Pacific professionals vs US Facebook users). Hunt et al. (2018, U Penn, n=143) provides the strongest experimental evidence: randomly limiting social media to 30 min/day significantly reduced depression and loneliness, suggesting that heavy use genuinely causes harm rather than merely correlating with it. Facebook deletion is not equivalent to deleting all social media; people who leave one platform often migrate to another. The roughly 3:1 ratio should be read as directionally suggestive — those who stay are more likely to express regret than those who leave — but the precise magnitude is weakly grounded.

生データ: /api/decisions.json

このデバイスで最近見た項目