Ga naar inhoud
Likelier

Spijt van handelen vs. niets doen

Borstvergroting ondergaan versus niet ondergaan

Als je handelt

Borstvergroting ondergaan

7,0%

Als je niets doet

Geen borstvergroting ondergaan

5,0%

Percentage dat later spijt heeft van elke keuze. De balken en het volledige overzicht staan hieronder.


Gezondheid

Laatst beoordeeld 2026-05-10

Kwaliteit van bewijs 4.25/5

Beoordelingsscore op acht dimensies volgens de kwaliteitsrubriek . Elke dimensie krijgt een score van 1 tot 5.

D1 Bronverificatie
4/5
D2 Autoriteit en onafhankelijkheid van bronnen
5/5
D3 Nauwkeurigheid van spijtcijfer
3/5
D4 Vergelijkbaarheid van bronnen
3/5
D5 Gilovich-patroon
4/5
D6 Prozakwaliteit
5/5
D7 Volledigheid van voorbehouden
5/5
D8 Steekproefkwaliteit
5/5
Gemiddelde 4.25/5
Two identical silhouettes side by side, one with a small surgical consent form resting beneath it, the other bare, on a neutral surface.

Spijt van handelen

Borstvergroting ondergaan

7,0%

~7% spijt van de procedure (bereik 5,1–9,1% over studies)

Cosmetische borstaugmentatie patiënten, systematische review

retrospectief, typisch 1–5 jaar na procedure

Spijt van nalaten

Geen borstvergroting ondergaan

5,0%

~5% (proxy-schatting — geen directe inactie-spijt enquête bestaat)

Amerikaanse volwassen vrouwen die overwegen maar geen cosmetische procedures nastreven

retrospectief, geen vast tijdsbestek

% betreurt deze keuze

balanced — Ongeveer in balans — beide keuzes leveren vergelijkbare spijt op.

Gerelateerde keuzes

Semantisch vergelijkbare keuzes — zelfde terrein, andere afwegingen.

Gezondheid

Cosmetische chirurgie

% betreurt deze keuze

In evenwicht

Grotendeels in evenwicht

Gezondheid

Brazilian Butt Lift (BBL)

% betreurt deze keuze

In evenwicht

Grotendeels in evenwicht

Gezondheid

Preventieve mastectomie of surveillance

% betreurt deze keuze

In evenwicht

Grotendeels in evenwicht

Gezondheid

Lichaamspiercings

% betreurt deze keuze

Handelen overheerst

Spijt over handelen 4.0× hoger

Gezondheid

Korea: cosmetische chirurgie vs. weigeren

% betreurt deze keuze

Handelen overheerst

Spijt over handelen 4.0× hoger

Gezondheid

Haartransplantatie

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 5.0× hoger

Gezondheid

Vasectomie

% betreurt deze keuze

In evenwicht

Grotendeels in evenwicht

lifestyle

Tatoeage

% betreurt deze keuze

Handelen overheerst

Spijt over handelen 1.6× hoger

Breast augmentation has one of the lowest regret rates in elective cosmetic surgery. A 2024 systematic review in the American Journal of Surgery — the most comprehensive available, covering regret across surgical subspecialties — places the breast-augmentation-specific range at 5.1—9.1%, with a midpoint around 7%. This is substantially lower than body contouring (11—33%) and far lower than many non-cosmetic elective procedures. A separate 2024 meta-analysis of 18,322 patients using the validated BREAST-Q instrument found large post-operative improvements in psychosocial well-being, sexual well- being, and breast satisfaction — domain gains that explain why regret remains modest despite the physical risks of the procedure.

The complication picture is more sobering than the regret rate suggests. Capsular contracture — abnormal scar tissue that hardens around the implant — is a well-documented long-term risk: the Sientra 10-year cohort reported a 10.8% Kaplan-Meier rate. Implant rupture occurs in approximately 7.8% of patients at 10 years. Both complications can require revision surgery; the FDA maintains a Breast Implant Registry to track long-term outcomes. Among patients who later underwent explant for implant illness, a multicenter longitudinal study of 156 patients found that 83.3% reported retroactive regret about the original augmentation decision — though this population is a small, highly selected subset with unusually severe complications.

On the inaction side, no published survey directly measures regret among women who considered but chose not to get breast augmentation. The ASDS consumer survey (70% of Americans considering some cosmetic procedure) and the Ipsos body-dissatisfaction figure (37% feel dissatisfied whenever they look in the mirror) are too broad to function as inaction-regret proxies: both conflate general appearance concern with surgical-specific regret. The 5% inaction estimate is a constructed placeholder — a conservative downward adjustment reflecting that persistent, surgery-specific regret is far less common than diffuse body dissatisfaction. The delta (0.02) should be read as “roughly balanced with a slight action tilt,” not as a precise quantitative claim. Unlike most life decisions, where inaction regret dominates over time, breast augmentation joins the small class of decisions — tattoos, cosmetic surgery broadly — where action regret is at least as common as inaction regret, held up by the physical permanence of the result.

Bronnen: handelen

Bronnenverantwoording

Elk getal hieronder is wat elke bron rapporteerde, met het letterlijke citaat waarop we ons baseerden en hoe we tot ons cijfer kwamen. Klik op een link om rechtstreeks te verifiëren.

  1. [1] The American Journal of Surgery — A systematic review of patient regret after surgery
    A systematic review of patient regret after surgery

    See all 2 Likelier entries citing this source →

    Statistiek
    Regret after breast augmentation: 5.1–9.1%
    Fragment
    “"Regret after elective plastic surgery operations is significantly higher compared to gender-affirming surgery. The percentage of patients reporting regret ranged from 0 to 47.1% in breast reconstruction, 5.1–9.1% in breast augmentation, and 10.82–33.3% in body contouring." ”
    Brongegevens van
    2024-04-30
    Geraadpleegd
    2026-05-10
    Berekening
    2024 AJS systematic review of patient regret across surgical subspecialties. Breast augmentation-specific subrange: 5.1–9.1%. We use 7% as the approximate midpoint. This is the most procedure-specific regret figure available in the peer-reviewed literature for cosmetic breast augmentation.
  2. [2] Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery — Quality of life and satisfaction after breast augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Breast-Q patient-reported outcomes
    Quality of life and satisfaction after breast augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Breast-Q patient-reported outcomes
    Statistiek
    Significant improvements across all BREAST-Q domains post-augmentation (39 studies, 18,322 patients): psychosocial well-being +38.10, sexual well-being +40.20, satisfaction with breast +47.88
    Fragment
    “"[Paraphrase from abstract -- full text paywalled] The pairwise meta-analysis of 39 studies comprising 53 patient cohorts and 18,322 patients revealed significant improvements in patient-reported psychosocial well-being (MD +38.10), sexual well-being (MD +40.20), and satisfaction with breast (MD +47.88) after breast augmentation (all p < 0.00001). BREAST-Q scores increased from 37.2, 31.1, and 26.3 to 75.0, 70.6, and 72.7 respectively." ”
    Brongegevens van
    2024-06-01
    Geraadpleegd
    2026-05-10
    Berekening
    2024 systematic review and meta-analysis of BREAST-Q outcomes. The high post-operative satisfaction scores (medians in the 70s on a 100-point scale) are consistent with the relatively low 7% regret rate. The large magnitude of improvement across psychosocial and sexual well-being domains explains why regret remains modest despite the risks of complications. Used as corroborating context, not the primary regret rate source.
  3. [3] Brazilian Journal of Plastic Surgery (RBCP) — Breast silicone explant: a multicenter longitudinal study
    Breast silicone explant: a multicenter longitudinal study
    Statistiek
    83.3% of patients who underwent breast implant explantation reported regret about the original augmentation decision (n=156)
    Fragment
    “"Of the patients evaluated, 83.3% reported regret having had the implant surgery, while 0.6% regretted having had the explant surgery." ”
    Brongegevens van
    2022-01-01
    Geraadpleegd
    2026-07-03
    Berekening
    Multicenter longitudinal observational study of 156 patients who underwent breast silicone explantation (Rev Bras Cir Plast 2022;37, DOI 10.5935/2177-1235.2022RBCP0026). Cited in body prose as context for the explant-for-illness subgroup: patients who progress to explant report very high retroactive regret about the original augmentation decision, but this is a small, highly selected, severe-complication subset, not representative of the general augmentation population used for the 5.1-9.1% action-regret range above. Not used to compute the action_side regret_rate (0.07), which remains anchored to the AJS systematic review.

Bronnen: niet handelen

Bronnenverantwoording

Elk getal hieronder is wat elke bron rapporteerde, met het letterlijke citaat waarop we ons baseerden en hoe we tot ons cijfer kwamen. Klik op een link om rechtstreeks te verifiëren.

  1. [1] American Society for Dermatologic Surgery (ASDS) — ASDS Survey: Seven Out of Ten Consumers Considering Cosmetic Procedures
    ASDS Survey: Seven Out of Ten Consumers Considering Cosmetic Procedures
    Statistiek
    70% of consumers considering a cosmetic dermatologic procedure
    Fragment
    “"Seven out of ten consumers are considering cosmetic procedures, according to the ASDS consumer survey. The consideration rate has risen steadily over the past decade." ”
    Brongegevens van
    2025-03-01
    Geraadpleegd
    2026-05-10
    Berekening
    ASDS annual consumer survey. The 70% figure encompasses all cosmetic procedures including minimally invasive (Botox, fillers), not surgical augmentation specifically. No published survey directly asks women who chose not to pursue breast augmentation whether they regret that inaction. The 5% is a conservative proxy: interest in cosmetic procedures is high, but converting curiosity into sustained inaction regret specific to breast augmentation is much rarer. This is an order-of-magnitude placeholder, not a measured finding.
  2. [2] Ipsos — Most Americans Experience Feeling Dissatisfied with How Their Body Looks from Time to Time
    Most Americans Experience Feeling Dissatisfied with How Their Body Looks from Time to Time

    See all 3 Likelier entries citing this source →

    Statistiek
    37% of Americans feel dissatisfied with their body whenever they look in the mirror
    Fragment
    “"Most Americans experience feeling dissatisfied with how their body looks from time to time, including nearly two in five who feel this way whenever they look in the mirror." ”
    Brongegevens van
    2018-01-10
    Geraadpleegd
    2026-05-10
    Berekening
    Ipsos nationally representative survey of 1,005 US adults. The 37% body dissatisfaction figure is a broad measure of appearance distress, not a breast-augmentation-specific regret measure. A small fraction of women with persistent chest-related body dissatisfaction who never pursue augmentation may carry lasting inaction regret, but this sub-fraction has not been measured. The 5% proxy is a downward adjustment from 37%, accounting for the fact that body dissatisfaction is far more common than regret specifically about not pursuing surgery.

Kanttekeningen

De twee zijden zijn niet methodologisch vergelijkbaar. De 7% actie-spijtschatting is getrokken uit de 5,1–9,1% subrange in een 2024 AJS systematische review — echte peer-reviewed data met procedure-specifieke granulariteit. De 5% inactie-schatting is een geconstrueerde proxy: geen grootschalige enquête heeft ooit vrouwen gevraagd die ervoor kozen om geen borstaugmentatie te krijgen of ze spijt hebben van die beslissing. Het ASDS cosmetische-overweging percentage (70%) en Ipsos lichaam-ontevredenheid percentage (37%) zijn veel te breed om als directe inactie-spijt maten te functioneren. Het werkelijke inactie-percentage is onbekend en kan hoger of lager zijn dan 5%. Verschillende factoren compliceren ook het actiepercentage: studies met langere follow-up neigen hogere spijt te tonen naarmate complicaties zich opstapelen (capsulaire contractuurpercentages bereiken 10,8% op 10 jaar per de Sientra cohort, en implantaatruptuur bereikt 7,8% op 10 jaar), terwijl studies op 1–2 jaar tevredenheidspercentages boven 90% rapporteren. Het verschil (0,02) weerspiegelt een ongeveer gebalanceerd Gilovich-profiel, met een lichte kanteling naar actie-spijt — wat een echte omkering is van het typische inactie-dominantie patroon. Spijtpercentages moeten niet worden geëxtrapoleerd naar populaties buiten de Verenigde Staten of naar niet-electieve borstchirurgie (reconstructie, reductie), die zeer verschillende spijtprofielen dragen.

Ruwe data: /api/decisions.json

Recent bekeken op dit apparaat