Ga naar inhoud
Likelier

Spijt van handelen vs. niets doen

Spaargeld in cryptocurrency beleggen vs. in traditionele beleggingen blijven

Als je handelt

Spaargeld in cryptovaluta beleggen

46%

Als je niets doet

In traditionele beleggingen blijven

16%

Percentage dat later spijt heeft van elke keuze. De balken en het volledige overzicht staan hieronder.


Financieel

Laatst beoordeeld 2026-05-13

Kwaliteit van bewijs 4.63/5

Beoordelingsscore op acht dimensies volgens de kwaliteitsrubriek . Elke dimensie krijgt een score van 1 tot 5.

D1 Bronverificatie
5/5
D2 Autoriteit en onafhankelijkheid van bronnen
5/5
D3 Nauwkeurigheid van spijtcijfer
3/5
D4 Vergelijkbaarheid van bronnen
4/5
D5 Gilovich-patroon
5/5
D6 Prozakwaliteit
5/5
D7 Volledigheid van voorbehouden
5/5
D8 Steekproefkwaliteit
5/5
Gemiddelde 4.63/5
Two piggy banks side by side, one decorated with a Bitcoin symbol, the other plain with a dollar sign.

Spijt van handelen

Spaargeld in cryptovaluta beleggen

46%

46% van Amerikaanse crypto-beleggers zeiden dat hun belegging slechter presteerde dan verwacht

Amerikaanse volwassenen die in cryptocurrency belegden, nationaal representatief

retrospectief, 2022

Spijt van nalaten

In traditionele beleggingen blijven

16%

16% van de mensen die geen crypto kochten hebben er spijt van dat ze dat niet deden

Amerikaanse volwassenen die het afgelopen jaar geen cryptocurrency kochten

retrospectief, 2022

% betreurt deze keuze

action dominates — Handelen domineert — de meesten hebben spijt dat ze handelden.

Gerelateerde keuzes

Semantisch vergelijkbare keuzes — zelfde terrein, andere afwegingen.

Financieel

Beleggen

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 3.2× hoger

Financieel

Vroeg investeren

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 3.2× hoger

lifestyle

EV vs benzine

% betreurt deze keuze

Handelen overheerst

Spijt over handelen 2.9× hoger

Financieel

Woningrenovatie

% betreurt deze keuze

Handelen overheerst

Spijt over handelen 2.3× hoger

Financieel

Vaste vs. variabele hypotheek

% betreurt deze keuze

Handelen overheerst

Spijt over handelen 3.6× hoger

FinancieelDirect

Huis kopen

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 5.6× hoger

Financieel

Huuronderhandeling

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 1.9× hoger

lifestyle

Reisuitgaven

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 11.8× hoger

46% of US crypto investors reported their investments did worse than expected, according to Pew Research Center’s nationally representative 2022 survey of 6,034 adults. That figure captures the core tension: cryptocurrency attracted mainstream adoption with promises of outsized returns, but nearly half of those who acted on the opportunity came away disappointed. On the other side, 16% of Americans who did not buy cryptocurrency told ConsumerAffairs in a 2022 survey of 1,074 adults that they regretted staying out — a real but minority experience of inaction regret (34% were glad they didn’t, and 51% were neutral).

The numbers are regime-dependent in ways that matter. Pew’s 46% was recorded near the post-Terra/LUNA collapse, when Bitcoin had fallen roughly 70% from its 2021 peak. A survey taken at the top of a bull market would show higher inaction regret and lower action regret; a survey taken deeper in a bear market might produce even higher action regret. The ConsumerAffairs inaction figure was also captured in 2022, near the same drawdown, which likely muted the missed-gains regret that a bull-market survey would have surfaced. The S&P 500’s roughly 150% gain from 2019 to 2024 provided traditional-asset holders with strong objective grounds for contentment, which likely held down their regret rate.

Gilovich’s temporal model predicts that action regrets are more salient in the short run but fade as people adapt, while inaction regrets persist. That pattern may play out differently here: crypto investors who took large losses have a concrete, specific loss to mourn, while non-investors who missed a bull run are haunted by a counterfactual that grows and shrinks with every market cycle. The 30-point gap favoring action regret is real but unusually volatile for this asset class. Unlike missing a decade of S&P returns, missing a crypto bull run is not a one-time counterfactual — it recurs every time the price makes headlines.

Bronnen: handelen

Bronnenverantwoording

Elk getal hieronder is wat elke bron rapporteerde, met het letterlijke citaat waarop we ons baseerden en hoe we tot ons cijfer kwamen. Klik op een link om rechtstreeks te verifiëren.

  1. [1] Pew Research Center — 46% of Americans who have invested in cryptocurrency say it's done worse than expected
    46% of Americans who have invested in cryptocurrency say it's done worse than expected
    Statistiek
    46% of US adults who had invested in, traded, or used cryptocurrency said their investment had done worse than expected
    Fragment
    “"Among those who have invested in, traded, or used cryptocurrency, 46% say their investments have done worse than expected. Just 15% say they've done better than expected, while 31% say about as expected and 8% are unsure." ”
    Brongegevens van
    2022-08-23
    Geraadpleegd
    2026-05-13
    Berekening
    Pew surveyed 6,034 US adults July 5-17, 2022. Of the 16% who had ever invested in, traded, or used crypto, 46% reported worse-than-expected outcomes. We use this as the action-regret proxy: investments that "did worse than expected" closely parallel the regret construct — the expectation gap is the dominant driver of investment regret. The 2024 Pew update found 38% still reported worse-than-expected results, slightly lower; the 2022 figure is used here as the most methodologically comparable snapshot tied to a specific market period.
  2. [2] Gallup — Cryptocurrency Still Has Limited Main Street Appeal
    Cryptocurrency Still Has Limited Main Street Appeal
    Statistiek
    14% of Americans currently own cryptocurrency as of June 2025; ownership remains concentrated among younger men
    Fragment
    “"Fourteen percent of U.S. adults overall report owning bitcoin or another cryptocurrency. Ownership is much higher, at 25%, among men aged 18 to 49 than among men aged 50 and older (12%), women aged 50 and older (9%) and women aged 18 to 49 (8%). College graduates (19%), upper-income Americans (19%) and political conservatives (18%) also report above-average ownership." ”
    Brongegevens van
    2025-06-15
    Geraadpleegd
    2026-05-14
    Berekening
    Gallup August 2025 tracking poll. Ownership plateau at 14% suggests that many early investors have not re-entered or have exited the market. Included as context for the stable-but- concentrated investor population; does not alter the action- regret rate.

Bronnen: niet handelen

Bronnenverantwoording

Elk getal hieronder is wat elke bron rapporteerde, met het letterlijke citaat waarop we ons baseerden en hoe we tot ons cijfer kwamen. Klik op een link om rechtstreeks te verifiëren.

  1. [1] ConsumerAffairs — The most regretted financial decisions in America: Survey
    The most regretted financial decisions in America: Survey
    Statistiek
    Among US adults who did not buy cryptocurrency in the past year, 16% say they regret it (34% glad they didn't, 51% neutral)
    Fragment
    “"Have you bought cryptocurrency within the past year? [No] — I'm glad I didn't: 34%. Neutral: 51%. I regret it: 16%." (From the "Collectible and crypto regret" graphic; source line reads "Survey of 1,074 U.S. adults".) ”
    Brongegevens van
    2022-05-10
    Geraadpleegd
    2026-07-14 · gearchiveerde kopie
    Berekening
    ConsumerAffairs surveyed 1,074 US adults (published 2022-05-10). The crypto-regret graphic splits respondents by whether they bought crypto in the past year. Among those who did NOT buy, 16% say they regret it — a direct inaction-regret measure for non-owners (the remainder: 34% glad they didn't, 51% neutral, totalling ~100% net of rounding). The 16% figure was read directly off the primary "Collectible and crypto regret" infographic (verified via web.archive.org / CDN image, 2026-07-14), not from a secondary paraphrase. This replaces a previously cited Bankrate "September 2022" figure (23%, with a 36%/12% age split) whose URL does not resolve and whose statistic could not be located in any real Bankrate source — it was removed as unverifiable. Both surveys sit near the 2022 crypto drawdown, so measured inaction regret is likely suppressed relative to a bull-market survey.

Kanttekeningen

Het actie-spijt percentage (46%) meet beleggingen die "slechter presteerden dan verwacht," wat een prestatie-teleurstelling proxy is, geen directe "ik heb spijt van beleggen" vraag. Sommige respondenten kunnen ontevreden zijn geweest terwijl ze nog steeds geloofden dat crypto de juiste langetermijnweddenschap was. De Pew 2024 update vond dat het percentage was gedaald tot 38%, wat suggereert dat de oorspronkelijke 46% piekpessimisme weerspiegelt rond de 2022 marktbodem. Het inactie-percentage (16%) komt uit een aparte ConsumerAffairs-enquête onder 1.074 Amerikaanse volwassenen, gepubliceerd in 2022, dus de populaties zijn niet direct gematched. De werkelijke inactie-spijt fluctueert waarschijnlijk substantieel met de Bitcoin-prijs: in een bullmarkt ervaren niet-eigenaren scherp hogere FOMO, terwijl crypto-beleggers die rond pieken kochten de meeste spijt vasthouden. Beide cijfers zijn zwaar regime-afhankelijk, en de 16% werd gemeten rond de 2022 koersdaling toen spijt over gemiste winsten gedempt was. De S&P 500 won ongeveer 150% van 2019 tot 2024, wat betekent dat traditionele-activa houders die een indexfonds volgden sterke objectieve rechtvaardiging hadden voor hun inactie; hun gemeten spijtpercentage kan deels die tevredenheid weerspiegelen.

Ruwe data: /api/decisions.json

Recent bekeken op dit apparaat