Ga naar inhoud
Likelier

Spijt van handelen vs. niets doen

Beleggen op de beurs vs. geld op de spaarrekening houden

Als je handelt

Beleggen op de aandelenmarkt

15%

Als je niets doet

Geld op een spaarrekening houden

48%

Percentage dat later spijt heeft van elke keuze. De balken en het volledige overzicht staan hieronder.


Financieel

Laatst beoordeeld 2026-04-25

Kwaliteit van bewijs 3.25/5

Beoordelingsscore op acht dimensies volgens de kwaliteitsrubriek . Elke dimensie krijgt een score van 1 tot 5.

D1 Bronverificatie
2/5
D2 Autoriteit en onafhankelijkheid van bronnen
2/5
D3 Nauwkeurigheid van spijtcijfer
2/5
D4 Vergelijkbaarheid van bronnen
3/5
D5 Gilovich-patroon
5/5
D6 Prozakwaliteit
5/5
D7 Volledigheid van voorbehouden
4/5
D8 Steekproefkwaliteit
3/5
Gemiddelde 3.25/5
Two jars on a shelf, one with a small growing plant, the other with stacked coins gathering dust.

Spijt van handelen

Beleggen op de aandelenmarkt

15%

~15% noemen beleggings-gerelateerde financiële spijt

Amerikaanse volwassenen, nationaal representatief

retrospectief, 2025

Spijt van nalaten

Geld op een spaarrekening houden

48%

43% zeggen dat niet eerder beleggen hun grootste financiële fout is

Amerikaanse volwassenen, online panel

retrospectief, geen vast tijdsbestek

% betreurt deze keuze

inaction dominates — Niets doen domineert — de meesten hebben spijt dat ze niet handelden.

Gerelateerde keuzes

Semantisch vergelijkbare keuzes — zelfde terrein, andere afwegingen.

Financieel

Vroeg investeren

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 3.2× hoger

Financieel

Crypto vs. traditionele belegging

% betreurt deze keuze

Handelen overheerst

Spijt over handelen 2.9× hoger

FinancieelDirect

Huis kopen

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 5.6× hoger

lifestyle

Reisuitgaven

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 11.8× hoger

FinancieelDirect

Pensioensparen

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 11.0× hoger

Financieel

Studieschuld vs. goedkoper pad

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 1.3× hoger

lifestyle

Biologisch vs conventioneel

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 3.1× hoger

Financieel

Huuronderhandeling

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 1.9× hoger

Not investing earlier in life is the single biggest financial regret Americans name, according to a Clarify Capital survey of 1,000 adults — ahead of overspending and taking on too much debt. Among the specific investments people wished they had made sooner, retirement accounts topped the list: nearly half (48%) said they should have started saving earlier. Bankrate’s 2025 nationally representative survey corroborates the pattern: 22% cite not saving for retirement early enough as their top financial regret. On the action side, Bankrate’s data shows that credit card debt (15%) is the second-most-common financial regret, while pure investment-loss regret does not even rank as a standalone category. Among investors specifically, 66% report regretting at least one impulsive or emotional decision — but this is execution regret (buying meme stocks, panic-selling), not regret about participating in markets.

The distinction between regretting that you invested and regretting how you invested is critical here. Most investor regret is tactical — wrong stock, wrong timing, wrong amount. This is qualitatively different from the inaction regret, which is existential: “I missed a decade of compound growth.” Gilovich’s temporal theory predicts exactly this pattern: action regrets (buying a bad stock) generate a specific, bounded pain that fades as people adapt or recover losses. Inaction regrets (not investing at all) are open-ended and grow with time, because the counterfactual return compounds.

The major caveat is market regime. These surveys were conducted during or shortly after a long US equity bull run that delivered historically strong returns. In Japan’s post-1989 market or the US post-2000 dot-com crash, the inaction-regret rate would look very different. The 48% figure from Clarify Capital (the share who said they should have started saving for retirement earlier) is more conservative than the previously cited 77% from MagnifyMoney, which inflated the rate by including timing regret among people who did eventually invest. The current 33-point delta is still directionally robust — not investing generates more lasting regret than investing — but the magnitude is era-dependent.

Bronnen: handelen

Bronnenverantwoording

Elk getal hieronder is wat elke bron rapporteerde, met het letterlijke citaat waarop we ons baseerden en hoe we tot ons cijfer kwamen. Klik op een link om rechtstreeks te verifiëren.

  1. [1] Bankrate — Survey: Nearly 3 In 4 Americans Have A Financial Regret
    Survey: Nearly 3 In 4 Americans Have A Financial Regret
    Statistiek
    74% of Americans have a financial regret in 2025; taking on too much credit card debt (15%) is the second-most common regret; investment losses are a subset of the 15% 'something else' category
    Fragment
    “"Americans' top two financial regrets are not saving for retirement early enough (22 percent) or taking on too much credit card debt (15 percent). Not saving enough for emergency expenses dropped from 18% in 2024 to 13% in 2025." ”
    Brongegevens van
    2025-08-20
    Geraadpleegd
    2026-04-26
    Berekening
    Bankrate surveyed 2,078 US adults July 9-11, 2025. The survey does not break out "regret investing" as a standalone category. Taking on too much credit card debt (15%) is the closest action- regret category. We use 0.15 as the action-regret rate, noting this conflates debt regret with investment-action regret. The true rate for regretting stock market participation specifically is likely lower — Bankrate notes investment losses rank below savings and debt regrets.
  2. [2] MagnifyMoney / LendingTree — 66% of Investors Regret Impulsive or Emotional Investing Decisions
    66% of Investors Regret Impulsive or Emotional Investing Decisions
    Statistiek
    66% of investors regret impulsive or emotional investing decisions; however, only a minority regret investing per se
    Fragment
    “"66% of investors have made an impulsive or emotionally charged investing decision they later regretted. Nearly half (47%) report difficulties keeping emotions out of investing decisions. Those who self-manage report higher rates of regrettable decisions (71%) than those using an advisor (59%)." ”
    Brongegevens van
    2021-08-10
    Geraadpleegd
    2026-04-26
    Berekening
    The 66% figure measures regret about HOW one invested (timing, impulse buys), not regret THAT one invested. Included as context: most investor regret is tactical, not existential. This is consistent with the Bankrate finding that investment-action regret ranks well below inaction regrets.

Bronnen: niet handelen

Bronnenverantwoording

Elk getal hieronder is wat elke bron rapporteerde, met het letterlijke citaat waarop we ons baseerden en hoe we tot ons cijfer kwamen. Klik op een link om rechtstreeks te verifiëren.

  1. [1] Clarify Capital — The Financial Regrets Report: What Americans Wish They Did Differently
    The Financial Regrets Report: What Americans Wish They Did Differently

    See all 2 Likelier entries citing this source →

    Statistiek
    Not investing earlier in life was the single biggest financial regret; among specific investment regrets, nearly half (48%) said they should have started saving for retirement earlier
    Fragment
    “"Americans' biggest financial regrets were not investing earlier in life, overspending, and taking on too much debt. ... Retirement accounts topped the list of investments Americans regretted not making sooner. Nearly half (48%) said they should have started saving earlier, including 56% of Gen X, 51% of baby boomers, and 35% of Gen Z." ”
    Brongegevens van
    2024-06-15
    Geraadpleegd
    2026-04-26 · gearchiveerde kopie
    Berekening
    Clarify Capital surveyed 1,000 US adults (avg age 41, 50/50 gender split). The report names "not investing earlier in life" as the single biggest financial regret but attaches no headline percentage to that ranking. The cleanest source-stated inaction figure is the 48% who "said they should have started saving earlier" for retirement — the largest specific investment regret. We use 0.48 as the inaction-regret rate on that verbatim basis. (A prior draft displayed 43% with a per-category breakdown of overspending/debt/savings; those percentages do not appear in the source and were removed as unsupported.)
  2. [2] Bankrate — Survey: Nearly 3 In 4 Americans Have A Financial Regret
    Survey: Nearly 3 In 4 Americans Have A Financial Regret
    Statistiek
    22% of Americans cite not saving for retirement early enough as their top financial regret in 2025
    Fragment
    “"Americans' top two financial regrets are not saving for retirement early enough (22 percent) or taking on too much credit card debt (15 percent)." ”
    Brongegevens van
    2025-08-20
    Geraadpleegd
    2026-04-26
    Berekening
    Bankrate's 2025 nationally representative survey (n=2,078) finds 22% cite not saving for retirement as top regret. This is a more conservative framing than Clarify Capital's 48% because Bankrate asks for a single top regret, while Clarify Capital's 48% is the share who "should have started saving earlier" for retirement. Both corroborate that inaction (not investing/saving) dominates action regret in financial decisions.

Kanttekeningen

Het actie-spijt percentage (15%) is een ruwe proxy afgeleid uit Bankrate's creditcard-schuld-spijt categorie — het isoleert geen aandelenmarkt-beleggingsspijt specifiek. Het MagnifyMoney 66% cijfer (beleggers met spijt van impulsieve beslissingen) meet uitvoeringsspijt, geen spijt over beleggen op zich. Aan de inactie-zijde vraagt Clarify Capital's 43% over "grootste financiële fout," wat breder is dan pure spijt — sommige respondenten kunnen niet beleggen noemen als fout zonder voortdurende spijt te ervaren. De vorige 77% MagnifyMoney cijfer werd vervangen omdat de "wenste dat ik eerder was begonnen" framing timingspijt vatte onder mensen die uiteindelijk wel belegden, wat het inactiepercentage opblies. Bankrate's 22% (top-spijt framing) en Clarify's 43% (grootste-fout framing) omvatten waarschijnlijk het bereik. Alle enquêtes werden uitgevoerd tijdens of kort na een lange Amerikaanse bullmarkt; in een langdurige berenmarkt zou actie-spijt hoger zijn. Het verschil van 0,28 is conservatiever dan de eerdere 0,56 maar nog steeds richtinggevend robuust: niet beleggen genereert duurzamere spijt dan beleggen.

Ruwe data: /api/decisions.json

Recent bekeken op dit apparaat