Ga naar inhoud
Likelier

Spijt van handelen vs. niets doen

Je uitspreken over een probleem vs zwijgen om conflict te vermijden

Als je handelt

Je uitspreken

38%

Als je niets doet

Zwijgen

53%

Percentage dat later spijt heeft van elke keuze. De balken en het volledige overzicht staan hieronder.


Carrière

Laatst beoordeeld 2026-04-26

Kwaliteit van bewijs 4.75/5

Beoordelingsscore op acht dimensies volgens de kwaliteitsrubriek . Elke dimensie krijgt een score van 1 tot 5.

D1 Bronverificatie
5/5
D2 Autoriteit en onafhankelijkheid van bronnen
5/5
D3 Nauwkeurigheid van spijtcijfer
4/5
D4 Vergelijkbaarheid van bronnen
5/5
D5 Gilovich-patroon
5/5
D6 Prozakwaliteit
5/5
D7 Volledigheid van voorbehouden
5/5
D8 Steekproefkwaliteit
4/5
Gemiddelde 4.75/5
Direct bewijs
Two identical office chairs at a conference table, one pushed back with a microphone in front, the other tucked in with an empty place setting.

Spijt van handelen

Je uitspreken

38%

38% hebben spijt van spreken in een vergadering

Werknemers in VS, UK, Frankrijk, Duitsland

retrospectief, geen vast tijdsbestek

Spijt van nalaten

Zwijgen

53%

53% hebben spijt van niet spreken in een vergadering

Werknemers in VS, UK, Frankrijk, Duitsland

retrospectief, geen vast tijdsbestek

% betreurt deze keuze

inaction dominates — Niets doen domineert — de meesten hebben spijt dat ze niet handelden.

Gerelateerde keuzes

Semantisch vergelijkbare keuzes — zelfde terrein, andere afwegingen.

career

Carrièrewissel

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 1.5× hoger

careerDirect

Salarisverhoging vragen

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 3.0× hoger

career

Ontslag nemen

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 2.2× hoger

career

Carrière vs balans

% betreurt deze keuze

Handelen overheerst

Spijt over handelen 1.3× hoger

career

Promotie nastreven vs rol accepteren

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 1.9× hoger

lifestyle

Ernstige fout toegeven vs. verbergen

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 2.9× hoger

career

Eigen bedrijf

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 5.5× hoger

lifestyle

Protest vs. stilte

% betreurt deze keuze

Niet-handelen overheerst

Spijt over niet-handelen 3.3× hoger

53% of workers say they have regretted not speaking up in a meeting, compared to 38% who regret having spoken up, according to Resume Now’s International Career Regrets Survey of 1,000 workers across the US, UK, France, and Germany. The gap is real but moderate — a 1.4:1 ratio that puts workplace voice closer to “balanced” than the lopsided inaction dominance seen in domains like travel or career risk-taking. A separate Zety survey of over 1,000 US workers found that 98% harbored some form of career regret, with women regretting not speaking up at a rate 34% higher than men.

The academic underpinning comes from Detert and Edmondson’s 2011 research on implicit voice theories — the taken-for-granted beliefs employees hold about when speaking up is risky or futile. Across 190 interviews and follow-up survey studies, they documented five distinct self-censorship rules that suppress voice even when the message would benefit the organization. The mechanism is straightforward: people default to silence because the social cost of speaking up (embarrassing a manager, being labeled a troublemaker) feels immediate and concrete, while the cost of silence (a problem festers, an opportunity evaporates) is diffuse and delayed. Gilovich and Medvec’s temporal pattern predicts exactly this: the sting of having spoken up fades as people rationalize or forget, but the nagging sense of “I should have said something” compounds over time.

The modest delta here deserves a caveat the flashier regret pairs do not need. Speaking up at work is not costless — 43% of employees fear retaliation for voicing concerns, and research shows that frequent or low-quality voice can lower status and performance ratings. This is one of the few domains where action regret holds non-trivial ground because the consequences of speaking up (a damaged relationship, a lost promotion) can be concrete and lasting. The directional finding still favors action, consistent with the broader regret literature, but the margin is narrow enough that blanket advice to “always speak up” would overstate what the data support.

Bronnen: handelen

Bronnenverantwoording

Elk getal hieronder is wat elke bron rapporteerde, met het letterlijke citaat waarop we ons baseerden en hoe we tot ons cijfer kwamen. Klik op een link om rechtstreeks te verifiëren.

1/2 bronnen onafhankelijk woordelijk geverifieerd tegenover de geciteerde bron

  1. [1] Resume Now — The Road Not Taken: Greatest Career Regrets Revealed Geverifieerd
    The Road Not Taken: Greatest Career Regrets Revealed

    See all 8 Likelier entries citing this source →

    Statistiek
    38% of workers have regretted speaking up in a meeting
    Fragment
    “"53% have regretted not speaking up in a meeting, compared to 38% who have regretted speaking up in a meeting." ”
    Brongegevens van
    2025-01-10
    Geraadpleegd
    2026-04-26
    Verificatie
    Fragment onafhankelijk opnieuw opgehaald en woord voor woord bevestigd tegenover de geciteerde bron tijdens onze onderbouwingsaudit.
    Berekening
    Resume Now International Career Regrets Survey of 1,000 workers across four countries (US, UK, France, Germany), fielded January 2024. The 38% figure represents those who specifically regretted having voiced an opinion in a meeting. Used directly as action- side regret rate.
  2. [2] Journal of Management Studies — An Exploratory Study of Employee Silence: Issues that Employees Don't Communicate Upward and Why
    An Exploratory Study of Employee Silence: Issues that Employees Don't Communicate Upward and Why
    Statistiek
    85% of employees reported situations where they felt unable to raise an issue to a supervisor despite believing it was important; the most frequent reason was fear of being labeled negatively
    Fragment
    “"85% of respondents said they had been in situations where they felt unable to raise an issue to a supervisor even though they felt the issue was important. The most frequently mentioned reason for remaining silent was the fear of being viewed or labeled negatively, and as a consequence, damaging valued relationships." ”
    Brongegevens van
    2003-09-01
    Geraadpleegd
    2026-04-26
    Berekening
    Milliken, Morrison & Hewlin (2003), Journal of Management Studies 40(6), 1453-1476. Interviewed 40 full-time employees across diverse industries. The 85% figure establishes that the vast majority of employees have experienced the voice/silence dilemma. The fear of negative labeling explains why action regret (38%) is non-trivially high in this domain — speaking up carries real social risk that does not fade easily.

Bronnen: niet handelen

Bronnenverantwoording

Elk getal hieronder is wat elke bron rapporteerde, met het letterlijke citaat waarop we ons baseerden en hoe we tot ons cijfer kwamen. Klik op een link om rechtstreeks te verifiëren.

2/4 bronnen onafhankelijk woordelijk geverifieerd tegenover de geciteerde bron

  1. [1] Resume Now — The Road Not Taken: Greatest Career Regrets Revealed Geverifieerd
    The Road Not Taken: Greatest Career Regrets Revealed

    See all 8 Likelier entries citing this source →

    Statistiek
    53% of workers have regretted not speaking up in a meeting
    Fragment
    “"53% have regretted not speaking up in a meeting, compared to 38% who have regretted speaking up in a meeting." ”
    Brongegevens van
    2025-01-10
    Geraadpleegd
    2026-04-26
    Verificatie
    Fragment onafhankelijk opnieuw opgehaald en woord voor woord bevestigd tegenover de geciteerde bron tijdens onze onderbouwingsaudit.
    Berekening
    Same Resume Now survey as the action side. The 53% figure represents those who specifically regretted remaining silent in a meeting when they had something to say. Used directly as inaction-side regret rate.
  2. [2] Academy of Management Journal — Implicit Voice Theories: Taken-for-Granted Rules of Self-Censorship at Work
    Implicit Voice Theories: Taken-for-Granted Rules of Self-Censorship at Work
    Statistiek
    Employees hold five distinct implicit theories that systematically suppress workplace voice even when speaking up would be pro-organizational
    Fragment
    “"Qualitative data from 190 interviews conducted in a knowledge-intensive multinational corporation suggest that fine-grained implicit theories underlie reluctance to voice even pro-organizational suggestions. Survey measures across subsequent studies establish that these implicit voice theories are widely held and significantly augment explanation of workplace silence." ”
    Brongegevens van
    2011-06-01
    Geraadpleegd
    2026-04-26
    Berekening
    Detert & Edmondson (2011), Academy of Management Journal 54(3), 461-488. This peer-reviewed study does not provide a single regret percentage but establishes the psychological mechanism behind self-censorship at work. It documents that employees routinely silence themselves based on taken-for-granted beliefs about hierarchy, even when speaking up would benefit the organization. Used as the theoretical anchor for why inaction regret in this domain is so prevalent.
  3. [3] Crucial Learning (formerly VitalSmarts) — Costly Conversations: How Lack of Communication is Costing Organizations Thousands in Revenue Geverifieerd
    Costly Conversations: How Lack of Communication is Costing Organizations Thousands in Revenue
    Statistiek
    43% of 1,100 employees estimate wasting two weeks or more ruminating about unresolved workplace problems; 1 in 3 estimate silence cost their organization at least $25,000
    Fragment
    “"43 percent of respondents estimate they waste two weeks or more ruminating about an unresolved problem at work. 1 in 3 employees estimate their inability to speak up in a crucial moment has cost their organization at least $25,000." ”
    Brongegevens van
    2022-02-15
    Geraadpleegd
    2026-04-26
    Verificatie
    Fragment onafhankelijk opnieuw opgehaald en woord voor woord bevestigd tegenover de geciteerde bron tijdens onze onderbouwingsaudit.
    Berekening
    Crucial Learning (formerly VitalSmarts) survey of 1,100 employees, December 2021 (follow-up to 2016 study). The 43% rumination figure and the financial cost estimates demonstrate that workplace silence generates significant ongoing regret and cognitive burden. Independently sourced from the Resume Now survey, corroborating the high inaction-regret pattern.
  4. [4] Zety — Biggest Career Regrets Revealed: Learn from Others' Mistakes
    Biggest Career Regrets Revealed: Learn from Others' Mistakes
    Statistiek
    98% of 1,000+ respondents experienced career regret; women regretted not speaking up at work at a rate 34% higher than men
    Fragment
    “"Female respondents most frequently lamented not speaking up about a problem at work, at a rate of 34 percent more than men. Just 2 percent reported they had no career regrets." ”
    Brongegevens van
    2019-10-01
    Geraadpleegd
    2026-04-26
    Berekening
    Zety survey of 1,000+ US workers. The 98% figure refers to overall career regret, not speaking-up regret specifically. The 34% gender gap highlights that not speaking up is disproportionately regretted by women. Used as corroborating evidence for the inaction-regret pattern.

Kanttekeningen

De kern actie- en inactie-percentages (38% en 53%) komen uit dezelfde Resume Now enquête, wat een sterkte is voor directe vergelijking maar een beperking in dat het sample zelfgeselecteerde carrièresite-gebruikers zijn — waarschijnlijk meer carrière-betrokken dan de algemene populatie. De vraag gaat specifiek over vergaderingen, niet alle werkplek-stilte; spijt over stil blijven over ethische of veiligheidsproblemen kan substantieel hoger zijn. Onafhankelijke bevestiging komt uit drie aanvullende bronnen: Milliken, Morrison & Hewlin (2003) vonden dat 85% van werknemers de stem/stilte dilemma had ervaren; Crucial Learning's 2021-enquête van 1.100 werknemers vond dat 43% twee weken of meer verspilt aan piekeren over onopgeloste problemen; en de Zety 34% genderkloof wijst in dezelfde richting. De 1,4:1 ratio is bescheiden naar regret-pair standaarden; werkplekstem is een van de weinige domeinen waar actie-spijt niet-triviaal hoog is, waarschijnlijk omdat spreken werkelijk professioneel risico draagt (vergelding, statusverlies) dat niet zo gemakkelijk vervaagt als andere actie-spijt.

Ruwe data: /api/decisions.json

Recent bekeken op dit apparaat