Aller au contenu
Likelier

Regret d’agir vs. de ne pas agir

Passer à un véhicule électrique vs garder une voiture à essence

Si vous agissez

Passer à la voiture électrique

46%

Si vous n’agissez pas

Garder une voiture thermique

16%

Pourcentage de personnes qui regrettent ensuite chaque choix. Les barres et le registre complet s’affichent ci-dessous.


Mode de vie

Dernière révision 2026-04-26

Qualité des preuves 4.25/5

Score d’évaluation en huit dimensions selon la grille de qualité . Chaque dimension notée de 1 à 5.

D1 Vérification des sources
5/5
D2 Autorité et indépendance des sources
4/5
D3 Précision du taux de regret
2/5
D4 Comparabilité des sources
3/5
D5 Motif de Gilovich
5/5
D6 Qualité de la prose
5/5
D7 Complétude des réserves
5/5
D8 Qualité de l’échantillon
5/5
Moyenne 4.25/5
Two car silhouettes side by side, one with an electric plug, the other with a gas pump nozzle.

Regret d'action

Passer à la voiture électrique

46%

46% des propriétaires américains de VE veulent revenir en arrière (proxy d'intention)

Propriétaires américains de VE, panel en ligne

rétrospective, pas de calendrier fixe

Regret d'inaction

Garder une voiture thermique

16%

16% des adultes américains sont susceptibles d'acheter un VE ensuite (proxy d'intention)

Adultes américains, panel basé sur la probabilité

rétrospective, pas de calendrier fixe

% regrettent ce choix

action dominates — L'action domine — la plupart regrettent d'avoir agi.

Décisions associées

Décisions sémantiquement similaires — même terrain, compromis différents.

Financier

Rénovation

% regrettent ce choix

L'action domine

Regret d'action 2.3× plus élevé

lifestyle

Régime végétarien

% regrettent ce choix

L'action domine

Regret d'action 3.8× plus élevé

Financier

Crypto vs. investissement traditionnel

% regrettent ce choix

L'action domine

Regret d'action 2.9× plus élevé

lifestyle

Dépenses de voyage

% regrettent ce choix

L'inaction domine

Regret d'inaction 11.8× plus élevé

FinancierDirecte

Juste taille vs. trop grand

% regrettent ce choix

L'action domine

Regret d'action 1.6× plus élevé

FinancierDirecte

Achat immobilier

% regrettent ce choix

L'inaction domine

Regret d'inaction 5.6× plus élevé

lifestyle

Garder ou replacer son animal

% regrettent ce choix

L'inaction domine

Regret d'inaction 5.7× plus élevé

Financier

Négocier le prix d'une voiture

% regrettent ce choix

L'inaction domine

Regret d'inaction 1.6× plus élevé

Nearly 46% of American EV owners say they are “very likely” to switch back to a gas-powered vehicle, according to McKinsey’s 2024 Mobility Consumer Pulse survey of over 4,000 US respondents. The top complaints are predictable infrastructure gripes: inadequate public charging (35%), high total ownership costs (34%), and the logistical headache of planning long trips (32%). On the other side, only 16% of US adults say they are likely to buy an EV as their next car, per AAA’s 2025 survey — a figure that has been falling, not rising. Both figures are intent proxies, not direct regret measures, which makes the 30-point delta less certain than it appears.

The McKinsey number deserves heavy caveats. InsideEVs and other analysts noted that the survey’s “switch back” framing may capture people who want to add a gas car to their household fleet, not necessarily abandon electric entirely. The respondent pool skewed toward newer, non-Tesla owners — people who bought affordable EVs on lease deals but lack home charging and rely on patchy public networks. J.D. Power’s competing 2025 EVX study found that only 12% of EV owners would consider an ICE replacement — implying action regret closer to 4–12%, not 46%. The 2026 J.D. Power study raised BEV repurchase intent to 96%, leaving only about 4% who would not consider another EV. The gulf between 46% wanting to “switch back” and the 4-12% who won’t consider another EV or lean toward ICE suggests the McKinsey question is measuring something broader than pure regret.

The asymmetry may also be transient. Early adoption of any technology produces higher buyer’s remorse because infrastructure, pricing, and product quality are still maturing. Gas cars benefit from a century of sunk-cost infrastructure that makes inaction nearly frictionless. If charging networks densify and battery costs continue falling, the action- regret rate will likely compress. For now, the data says what it says: most gas-car owners feel no pull toward EVs, and a large minority of EV owners express interest in returning to gas — though whether that constitutes regret or merely flexibility remains genuinely unclear.

Sources : action

Registre des sources

Chaque chiffre ci-dessous correspond à ce que la source a rapporté, avec la citation textuelle sur laquelle nous nous sommes appuyés et la méthode de calcul. Cliquez sur un lien pour vérifier directement.

1/3 sources vérifiées de manière indépendante, mot pour mot, par rapport à la source citée

  1. [1] McKinsey & Company — New twists in the electric-vehicle transition: A consumer perspective
    New twists in the electric-vehicle transition: A consumer perspective
    Statistique
    46% of US EV owners said they were 'very likely' to switch back to a gas-powered vehicle for their next purchase
    Extrait
    “"Forty-six percent of battery electric vehicle owners in the United States said they were 'very likely' to switch back to owning an internal-combustion-engine vehicle for their next purchase. Thirty-five percent cited inadequate public charging infrastructure, 34% said total costs were too high, and 32% said long-trip planning was too difficult." ”
    Données source de
    2024-06-18
    Consulté le
    2026-04-26
    Calcul
    McKinsey Mobility Consumer Pulse, February 2024. Surveyed 36,954 mobility users across nine countries; US subsample N = 4,112. The 46% figure reflects those selecting "very likely" to switch back to ICE. This measures switching intent, not regret directly — some respondents may want to add a gas car while keeping their EV, not abandon electric entirely.
  2. [2] InsideEVs — Are Half Of EV Owners Really 'Switching Back' To Gas? It's Complicated.
    Are Half Of EV Owners Really 'Switching Back' To Gas? It's Complicated.
    Statistique
    The 46% figure includes new EV owners who lack home charging, bought non-Tesla EVs with weaker charging networks, and may be considering adding a gas car rather than fully abandoning EVs
    Extrait
    “"Those new owners surveyed are increasingly moving away from the profile that long-defined EV life: upper-income or wealthy, probably a single-family homeowner and probably buying a Tesla. Instead, they're buying from other brands at more affordable prices, often enticed by aggressive leasing and financing deals for EVs. But that also means that they're living without Tesla's robust and reliable fast-charging network; may live in apartments without easy access to charging; and are less willing to put up with the kinds of EV-related headaches that many early adopters took in stride." ”
    Données source de
    2024-06-25
    Consulté le
    2026-04-26
    Calcul
    InsideEVs contextual analysis. Notes that "switch back" may include adding a gas vehicle to the household fleet rather than pure abandonment. The McKinsey methodology was not fully disclosed, and the question wording may conflate fleet diversification with outright regret.
  3. [3] J.D. Power — 2025 U.S. Electric Vehicle Experience (EVX) Ownership Study Vérifié
    2025 U.S. Electric Vehicle Experience (EVX) Ownership Study
    Statistique
    94% of BEV owners are likely to consider purchasing another BEV; only 12% likely to consider replacing EV with ICE
    Extrait
    “"94% of pure EV (BEV) owners are likely to consider purchasing another BEV for their next vehicle. Only 12% of BEV owners are likely to consider replacing their EV with an internal combustion engine-powered vehicle during their next purchase." ”
    Données source de
    2025-03-12
    Consulté le
    2026-04-26
    Vérification
    Extrait récupéré et confirmé de manière indépendante, mot pour mot, par rapport à la source citée lors de notre audit de vérification.
    Calcul
    J.D. Power 2025 EVX Ownership Study provides a contradicting data point. The 12% ICE-switch rate vs McKinsey's 46% likely reflects differences in question wording, sample composition, and what "switch back" means. J.D. Power's 2026 study raised BEV repurchase intent to 96%. The true action-regret rate likely falls between 12% and 46% depending on how strictly one defines "regret."

Sources : inaction

Registre des sources

Chaque chiffre ci-dessous correspond à ce que la source a rapporté, avec la citation textuelle sur laquelle nous nous sommes appuyés et la méthode de calcul. Cliquez sur un lien pour vérifier directement.

2/2 sources vérifiées de manière indépendante, mot pour mot, par rapport à la source citée

  1. [1] AAA — AAA: Americans Slow to Adopt Electric Vehicles Vérifié
    AAA: Americans Slow to Adopt Electric Vehicles
    Statistique
    Only 16% of US adults said they were 'very likely' or 'likely' to purchase an EV as their next vehicle; 63% said they were 'unlikely' or 'very unlikely'
    Extrait
    “"Only 16% of U.S. adults report being 'very likely' or 'likely' to purchase a fully electric vehicle (EV) as their next car. The percentage of consumers indicating they would be 'unlikely' or 'very unlikely' to purchase an EV rose to 63%, the highest since 2022." ”
    Données source de
    2025-06-12
    Consulté le
    2026-04-26
    Vérification
    Extrait récupéré et confirmé de manière indépendante, mot pour mot, par rapport à la source citée lors de notre audit de vérification.
    Calcul
    AAA survey conducted March 6-10, 2025, probability-based panel representative of US households, N = 1,128. The 16% "likely to buy EV" figure is an upper-bound proxy for inaction regret among gas-car keepers — it captures aspiration toward switching, not regret per se. The true inaction-regret rate is likely lower because stated purchase intent overstates actual switching behavior.
  2. [2] Gallup — EV Ownership Ticks Up, but Fewer Nonowners Want to Buy One Vérifié
    EV Ownership Ticks Up, but Fewer Nonowners Want to Buy One
    Statistique
    Only 44% of US adults say they are 'seriously considering or might consider' buying an EV, down from 55% in 2023; 48% say they do not intend to buy one
    Extrait
    “"Less than half of adults, 44%, now say they are either seriously considering or might consider buying an EV in the future, down from 55% in 2023, while the proportion not intending to buy one has increased from 41% to 48%. Sixty-one percent of lower-income Americans say they would not buy an EV, up 18 percentage points from 43% in 2023." ”
    Données source de
    2024-04-08
    Consulté le
    2026-04-26
    Vérification
    Extrait récupéré et confirmé de manière indépendante, mot pour mot, par rapport à la source citée lors de notre audit de vérification.
    Calcul
    Gallup annual tracking poll. The declining EV interest corroborates the AAA finding that most gas-car owners are content with their choice. Among non-owners, interest has fallen 7 points year-over-year, suggesting inaction regret is not intensifying.

Réserves

AVERTISSEMENT PROXY : Aucun taux n'est une mesure directe du regret. Le 46% de McKinsey capture l'intention déclarée de « revenir en arrière », qui confond le regret pur et simple avec la diversification de flotte — certains répondants peuvent simplement vouloir ajouter une voiture à essence tout en gardant leur VE. Le 16% de AAA capture la probabilité d'achat, pas le regret ; la plupart des propriétaires de voitures à essence qui sont satisfaits ne pensent simplement jamais aux VE. Des enquêtes concurrentes contredisent fortement le chiffre de McKinsey : l'étude EVX 2025 de J.D. Power a constaté que 94% des propriétaires de VE envisageraient d'acheter un autre VE (seuls 12% envisagent un retour à ICE), et leur étude 2026 a porté cela à 96%. L'écart provient probablement de la formulation des questions, de la composition de l'échantillon (le panel de McKinsey incluait de nombreux propriétaires non-Tesla première fois sans chargement à domicile), et de savoir si « revenir en arrière » signifie « abandonner les VE complètement » ou « ajouter une voiture à essence ». La conclusion de dominance d'action est inhabituelle dans la littérature de Gilovich et peut refléter un moment de technologie transitoire plutôt qu'un schéma stable de regret à long terme. Les deux chiffres doivent être lus comme des proxies d'intention, pas des mesures directes de regret. Les données d'enquête sont tirées exclusivement d'échantillons des États-Unis ; les taux de satisfaction et de regret dans les pays avec des structures institutionnelles différentes — normes des consommateurs, déploiement d'infrastructure de chargement, taxes sur les carburants et structures d'incitation VE — peuvent différer substantiellement.

Données brutes : /api/decisions.json

Récemment consultés sur cet appareil