Lewati ke konten
Likelier

Penyesalan bertindak vs. tidak bertindak

Mempertahankan hewan peliharaan vs. mencari rumah baru untuknya

Jika Anda bertindak

Mempertahankan hewan peliharaan

15%

Jika Anda tidak bertindak

Memindahkan hewan ke pemilik lain

86%

Persentase orang yang kemudian menyesali setiap pilihan. Diagram batang dan catatan lengkap ditampilkan di bawah.


Lifestyle

Terakhir ditinjau 2026-05-02

Kualitas bukti 4.13/5

Skor tinjauan delapan dimensi terhadap rubrik kualitas . Setiap dimensi dinilai 1–5.

D1 Verifikasi sumber
5/5
D2 Otoritas & independensi sumber
3/5
D3 Akurasi tingkat penyesalan
3/5
D4 Keterbandingan sumber
3/5
D5 Pola Gilovich
5/5
D6 Kualitas prosa
5/5
D7 Kelengkapan peringatan
5/5
D8 Kualitas sampel
4/5
Rata-rata 4.13/5
Two quiet corners of a home: one with a pet bed and water bowl, one empty.

Penyesalan atas tindakan

Mempertahankan hewan peliharaan

15%

15% pemilik hewan peliharaan Inggris pernah menyesali memiliki hewan peliharaan (RSPCA 2024)

Orang dewasa Inggris yang memiliki hewan peliharaan, representatif nasional

retrospektif, disurvei Maret-April 2024

Penyesalan atas kelambanan

Memindahkan hewan ke pemilik lain

86%

86% orang yang menyerahkan hewan peliharaan dalam 3 tahun terakhir berharap mereka tidak harus melakukannya (HASS 2023/2024)

Orang dewasa AS yang menyerahkan hewan peliharaan dalam 3 tahun terakhir, survei komunitas di 9 komunitas AS

retrospektif, jendela penarikan kembali 3 tahun, disurvei 2023/2024

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

inaction dominates — Tidak bertindak mendominasi — sebagian besar menyesali karena tidak bertindak.

Keputusan terkait

Keputusan yang serupa secara semantik — area yang sama, kompromi yang berbeda.

lifestyle

Diet vegetarian

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Tindakan mendominasi

Penyesalan bertindak 3.8× lebih tinggi

lifestyle

Meninggalkan kampung

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Ketidakaktifan mendominasi

Penyesalan tidak bertindak 1.5× lebih tinggi

lifestyle

Meninggalkan agama

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Ketidakaktifan mendominasi

Penyesalan tidak bertindak 2.9× lebih tinggi

lifestyle

Kota vs pinggiran

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Tindakan mendominasi

Penyesalan bertindak 1.2× lebih tinggi

lifestyle

Pindah ke luar negeri

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Ketidakaktifan mendominasi

Penyesalan tidak bertindak 5.7× lebih tinggi

family

Adopsi vs. besarkan sendiri

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Tindakan mendominasi

Penyesalan bertindak 4.8× lebih tinggi

lifestyle

Mobil listrik vs bensin

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Tindakan mendominasi

Penyesalan bertindak 2.9× lebih tinggi

lifestyle

Menjaga persahabatan vs. kehilangan

% menyesal dengan pilihan ini

Ketidakaktifan mendominasi

Penyesalan tidak bertindak 5.9× lebih tinggi

Among UK pet owners who kept their animals, 15% say they have regretted owning a pet at some time (RSPCA/YouGov 2024, n=6,053). Among US residents who surrendered a pet within the past three years, 86% wished they had not had to (HASS Community Values Survey 2023/2024, n=2,500). The 71-percentage-point gap is one of the largest bilateral asymmetries in this dataset and points strongly toward the inaction side: people who gave up their pets regret it far more often than people who kept them.

The psychology here tracks the exit-cost structure of pet ownership. Relinquishment carries substantial disenfranchised grief — the loss is often treated as less legitimate than human bereavement, which suppresses social support and amplifies regret. Many surrenders are coerced rather than chosen: the HASS survey’s own context notes that housing loss, financial hardship, and health emergencies are common drivers of relinquishment. A person who surrendered a dog because a landlord prohibited pets did not make a free preference reversal; the 86% “wished they didn’t have to” rate captures this entire population, including those for whom no better option existed. The action-side psychology runs differently: pet regret among owners is largely front-loaded with information that was available before acquisition — cost, time demands, behavioural issues — and coexists with high attachment (HABRI 2022: 92% of pet owners globally say there is no reason they would ever be convinced to give up their pet). Regret and continued attachment are not mutually exclusive.

Three caveats shape how this entry should be read. First, the two surveys are not methodologically symmetric: RSPCA asks UK owners about lifetime regret, HASS asks US surrenderers about regret within a 3-year window from a community services survey. Both biases (RSPCA under-reporting due to reputational framing, HASS over-reporting due to self-selection of engaged community respondents) work in the same direction — compressing the gap — yet the gap remains 71 points. Second, species heterogeneity matters: dog ownership generates the highest regret profile given time, space, and cost demands; cat and small-animal regret rates are lower and rarely appear in survey literature. Third, the rise from 13% (2023) to 15% (2024) coincides with a period of above-inflation pet-care cost increases — 81% of RSPCA/YouGov respondents reported higher costs in 2023, up from 68% in 2022 — so the current 15% may normalise downward if those cost pressures ease, though no RSPCA wave prior to 2023 published a directly comparable regret figure to confirm a longer-run baseline.

Sumber: tindakan

Buku besar klaim

Setiap angka di bawah ini adalah apa yang dilaporkan masing-masing sumber, dengan kutipan kata demi kata yang kami andalkan dan bagaimana kami sampai pada angka kami. Klik tautan mana saja untuk memverifikasi langsung.

3/3 sumber diverifikasi secara independen kata demi kata terhadap sumber terkutip

  1. [1] RSPCA / YouGov — Animal Kindness Index 2024 Terverifikasi
    Animal Kindness Index 2024
    Statistik
    15% of UK pet owners (1 in 7) say they have regretted owning a pet at some time, up from 13% (1 in 8) in 2023
    Kutipan
    “"Financial concerns are fuelling an increase in the proportion of pet owners who regret having a pet — with one in seven (15%) regretting having a pet in 2024, compared to one in eight (13%) in 2023. This is equivalent to 2.6 million pets whose owners have experienced regret." ”
    Data sumber dari
    2024-06-01
    Diakses
    2026-05-01
    Verifikasi
    Kutipan diambil ulang secara independen dan dikonfirmasi kata demi kata terhadap sumber terkutip selama audit pendasaran kami.
    Perhitungan
    RSPCA Animal Kindness Index 2024, conducted by YouGov online among 6,053 UK adults between 27 March and 10 April 2024. Results weighted to be representative of the UK adult population aged 16+. The 15% figure is a direct retrospective regret measure ("have you ever regretted owning a pet"). Used directly as the action-side rate.
  2. [2] RSPCA / YouGov — Animal Kindness Index 2023 — Pet Owners Terverifikasi
    Animal Kindness Index 2023 — Pet Owners
    Statistik
    13% of UK pet owners (1 in 8) say they have regretted owning a pet; reasons include behavioural issues (28%), cost (25%), circumstances changing (18%), and insufficient time (15%)
    Kutipan
    “"One in eight pet owners (13%) say they have regretted owning a pet at some time. The cost of looking after pets has risen faster than inflation, which is around 8%, with significant price increases across pet care products. 81% of respondents say it's more expensive to look after their pets, compared to 68% in 2022." ”
    Data sumber dari
    2023-06-01
    Diakses
    2026-05-01
    Verifikasi
    Kutipan diambil ulang secara independen dan dikonfirmasi kata demi kata terhadap sumber terkutip selama audit pendasaran kami.
    Perhitungan
    RSPCA Animal Kindness Index 2023, also conducted by YouGov. The 13% figure from 2023 corroborates the 2024 figure (15%) and establishes a rising trend driven by cost inflation. Used as corroborating source; primary action-side rate is from the 2024 wave.
  3. [3] Human Animal Bond Research Institute (HABRI) / Zoetis — New Research Confirms the Strong Bond Between People and Pets is a Global Phenomenon, 95% Worldwide Say Pets Are Family Terverifikasi
    New Research Confirms the Strong Bond Between People and Pets is a Global Phenomenon, 95% Worldwide Say Pets Are Family
    Statistik
    92% of pet owners globally say there is no reason they would ever be convinced to give up their pet
    Kutipan
    “"92% say there's no reason they would ever be convinced to give up their pet." ”
    Data sumber dari
    2022-01-16
    Diakses
    2026-07-03
    Verifikasi
    Kutipan diambil ulang secara independen dan dikonfirmasi kata demi kata terhadap sumber terkutip selama audit pendasaran kami.
    Perhitungan
    HABRI/Zoetis International Human-Animal Bond Survey, n=16,140 pet owners (plus 1,207 veterinarians) across eight countries (US, UK, France, Germany, Spain, Brazil, Japan, China), fielded 2021 and released January 16, 2022. Cited in body prose as corroborating evidence that pet-ownership regret coexists with high attachment; not used in the primary action-side regret-rate arithmetic, which remains the RSPCA/YouGov 15% figure above.

Sumber: tidak bertindak

Buku besar klaim

Setiap angka di bawah ini adalah apa yang dilaporkan masing-masing sumber, dengan kutipan kata demi kata yang kami andalkan dan bagaimana kami sampai pada angka kami. Klik tautan mana saja untuk memverifikasi langsung.

  1. [1] Human Animal Support Services (HASS) — HASS Community Values Survey Results
    HASS Community Values Survey Results
    Statistik
    86% of people who had relinquished a pet in the past three years wished they did not have to
    Kutipan
    “"86% of people who had relinquished a pet in the past three years wished they did not have to." ”
    Data sumber dari
    2024-02-01
    Diakses
    2026-05-02
    Perhitungan
    HASS Community Values Survey, n=2,500 respondents across nine US communities, conducted by professional survey firm. The 86% figure measures constrained regret: respondents who had actually surrendered a pet and wished the circumstances had not required it. This captures both pure preference reversal ("I regret giving up my pet") and coerced regret ("circumstances forced my hand but I wish they hadn't"). The distinction matters: a meaningful share of surrenders result from housing loss, financial crisis, or health emergencies — situations where the relinquisher knew at the time there was no better option yet still experienced regret. Used directly as the inaction-side rate. The wording "wished they did not have to" is the most direct available proxy for post-relinquishment regret; no large study asks the cleaner question "do you regret giving up your pet?" as a standalone item.

Catatan

Ukuran tindakan dan non-tindakan diambil dari negara yang berbeda (Inggris dan AS), instrumen yang berbeda (RSPCA/YouGov vs. survei komunitas HASS), dan pembingkaian pertanyaan yang berbeda. Pertanyaan sisi tindakan ("apakah Anda pernah menyesali memiliki hewan peliharaan?") adalah retrospektif seumur hidup; pertanyaan sisi non-tindakan ("berharap mereka tidak harus" menyerahkan) memiliki jendela penarikan kembali 3 tahun dan menggabungkan pembalikan preferensi sejati dengan penyesalan yang dipaksakan. Kesenjangan 71 poin persentase cukup besar sehingga tidak ada noise tingkat negara atau perbedaan pembingkaian pertanyaan yang merupakan penjelasan yang plausibel. Spesies penting: penyesalan anjing tertinggi (waktu, biaya, tuntutan ruang); penyesalan kucing dan hewan kecil lebih rendah. Inflasi biaya pasca-pandemi kemungkinan menggelembungkan tingkat penyesalan 2024. Entri ini berlaku untuk keputusan menyerahkan hewan peliharaan yang ada.

Data mentah: /api/decisions.json

Baru-baru ini dilihat di perangkat ini