Kualitas bukti 4.0/5
Skor tinjauan delapan dimensi terhadap rubrik kualitas . Setiap dimensi dinilai 1–5.
- D1 Dasar sumber
- 4/5
- D2 Otoritas sumber
- 4/5
- D3 Aritmetika
- 5/5
- D4 Ketidakpastian
- 4/5
- D5 Cakupan
- 4/5
- D6 Prosa
- 4/5
- D7 Kejujuran persepsi
- 4/5
- D8 Kelengkapan peringatan
- 3/5
Berjalan saat tidur pada anak cukup umum sehingga hampir tidak bisa disebut luar biasa. Dalam kohort prospektif Quebec berisi 1.940 anak yang diikuti sejak bayi, sekitar 29% berjalan saat tidur setidaknya sekali antara usia 2½ dan 13 tahun (angka yang dilaporkan dalam siaran pers jurnal), dan proporsi dalam satu tahun mencapai puncak 13,4% pada usia 10 tahun (Petit dkk. 2015). Sebuah meta-analisis yang menggabungkan 51 studi menempatkan angka 12 bulan untuk anak-anak pada 5,0%, dibandingkan 1,5% pada orang dewasa (Stallman dan Kohler 2016); selisih antara kedua sumber mungkin, setidaknya sebagian, mencerminkan perbedaan cara pertanyaan diajukan. Yang belum pernah diukur siapa pun adalah angka yang sebenarnya ditanyakan halaman ini: seberapa sering anak yang berjalan saat tidur terluka. Tidak ada studi yang ditemukan yang melaporkan cedera per anak yang berjalan saat tidur atau per episode, karena itu tidak ada probabilitas yang dipublikasikan di sini.
Yang paling mendekati data berasal dari orang dewasa dan remaja yang lebih tua. Sebuah IGD di Bern menelusuri sekitar 620.000 kunjungan selama kurang lebih 15 tahun dan menemukan 11 cedera terkait berjalan saat tidur; jatuh menjadi mekanisme utama, empat pasien dirawat inap, dan tidak ada yang meninggal (Sauter dkk. 2016). Itu sekitar satu dari setiap 56.000 kunjungan, yang terdengar menenangkan tetapi bukan angka per orang yang berjalan saat tidur: IGD itu tidak melayani siapa pun di bawah 16 tahun, tidak tahu berapa banyak orang yang berjalan saat tidur tinggal di wilayah layanannya, dan hanya menemukan kasus yang rekam medisnya mencantumkan “berjalan saat tidur”. Rasa takut itu sendiri dibangun dari sedikit gambaran yang kuat (ujung atas tangga, pagar yang tidak terkunci, jendela yang terbuka) yang diulang oleh panduan kesehatan anak ketika menyarankan pagar dan jendela terkunci. Panduan semacam itu menandakan bahaya yang masuk akal, bukan frekuensi yang terukur.
Lebih mudah menggambarkan bagaimana angka yang hilang itu akan berbeda antarrumah tangga daripada memperkirakannya. Peluang berjalan saat tidur meningkat seiring riwayat keluarga, dari 22,5% pada anak tanpa orang tua yang berjalan saat tidur menjadi 47,4% dengan satu dan 61,5% dengan dua (Petit dkk. 2015). Tangga, ranjang susun, dan jendela yang terjangkau kemungkinan berpengaruh pada risiko cedera, tetapi belum ada studi yang membandingkan tingkat cedera orang yang berjalan saat tidur di lingkungan-lingkungan tersebut. Untuk jatuh dari tangga dan jendela secara umum, entah anak itu terjaga atau tidak, lihat Jatuh dari tangga (balita) dan Anak jatuh dari jendela; keduanya tidak memisahkan jatuh saat berjalan dalam tidur dari jatuh biasa.
Fakta terkait
Sekitar 3 dari 10 anak (menurut siaran pers jurnal tersebut) dalam kohort Quebec berisi 1.940 anak pernah berjalan saat tidur setidaknya sekali antara usia 2½ dan 13 tahun. Seberapa sering anak yang berjalan saat tidur terluka, di tangga atau di mana pun, belum pernah diukur.
Buku besar klaim
Setiap angka di bawah ini adalah apa yang dilaporkan masing-masing sumber, dengan kutipan kata demi kata yang kami andalkan dan bagaimana kami sampai pada angka kami. Klik tautan mana saja untuk memverifikasi langsung.
-
[1] JAMA Pediatrics (Petit et al. 2015; 169(7):653-658) — Childhood Sleepwalking and Sleep Terrors: A Longitudinal Study of Prevalence and Familial Aggregation
Childhood Sleepwalking and Sleep Terrors: A Longitudinal Study of Prevalence and Familial Aggregation- Statistik
Prospective Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child Development cohort, N=1,940 children followed 1999-2011: sleepwalking prevalence peaked at 13.4% (95% CI 11.3%-15.5%) at age 10; childhood sleepwalking prevalence was 22.5% with no parental history, 47.4% with one sleepwalking parent, and 61.5% with two- Kutipan
“"The peak of prevalence was observed at 1½ years for sleep terrors (34.4% of children; 95% CI, 32.3%-36.5%) and at age 10 years for sleepwalking (13.4%; 95% CI, 11.3%-15.5%)." ... "The prevalence of childhood sleepwalking increases with the degree of parental history of sleepwalking: 22.5% (95% CI, 19.2%-25.8%) for children without a parental history of sleepwalking, 47.4% (95% CI, 38.9%-55.9%) for children who had 1 parent with a history of sleepwalking, and 61.5% (95% CI, 42.8%-80.2%) for children whose mother and father had a history of sleepwalking." [Abstract text; PubMed and JAMA Network were not directly reachable in-session, so the wording was confirmed via exact-phrase search of the indexed abstract] ”
- Data sumber dari
- 2015-07-01
- Diakses
- 2026-09-26
- Perhitungan
- Used only as context for exposure: how many children sleepwalk at all. The 13.4% peak at age 10 is a point prevalence in that year; the 22.5% / 47.4% / 61.5% figures are cumulative childhood prevalence stratified by parental history. No injury outcome is reported, so nothing is converted to a native or normalized probability. The parental-history gradient is described in prose rather than as personal_factor_multipliers because this entry carries no_reliable_estimate and the gradient shifts the chance of sleepwalking, not the chance of injury given sleepwalking.
-
[2] JAMA Pediatrics press release via EurekAlert! (AAAS) — Kids likely to sleepwalk if parents have history of nocturnal strolls
Kids likely to sleepwalk if parents have history of nocturnal strolls- Statistik
Overall childhood prevalence of sleepwalking, ages 2½ to 13, was 29.1% in the Quebec cohort- Kutipan
“"The overall childhood prevalence of sleepwalking (ages 2½ to 13 years) was 29.1 percent." ”
- Data sumber dari
- 2015-05-04
- Diakses
- 2026-09-26
- Perhitungan
- The journal's own press release for Petit et al. (2015), cited because it states the cumulative 2½-to-13 figure in one line. The 29.1% could not be found in the indexed abstract text via search, so it rests on this release rather than the peer-reviewed abstract; the abstract's parental-history strata (22.5% to 61.5%) are consistent with it. Rounded to "about 29%" / "about 3 in 10" in the quick answer and prose. Exposure context only; no injury figure.
- Independensi
- Not independent of Petit et al. (2015); it summarizes the same study.
-
[3] PLOS ONE (Stallman & Kohler 2016) — Prevalence of Sleepwalking: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Prevalence of Sleepwalking: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis- Statistik
Meta-analysis of 51 studies (N=100,490): lifetime sleepwalking prevalence 6.9% (95% CI 4.6%-10.3%); 12-month prevalence 5.0% (95% CI 3.8%-6.5%) in children versus 1.5% (95% CI 1.0%-2.3%) in adults- Kutipan
“"The estimated lifetime prevalence of sleepwalking was 6.9% (95% CI 4.6%-10.3%). The current prevalence rate of sleepwalking within the last 12 months was significantly higher in children [5.0% (95% CI 3.8%-6.5%)] than adults [1.5% (95% CI 1.0%-2.3%)]." [Abstract text; PLOS and PMC were not directly reachable in-session, so the wording was confirmed via search of the indexed abstract; dash and bracket punctuation may differ slightly from the published typography] ”
- Data sumber dari
- 2016-11-10
- Diakses
- 2026-09-26
- Perhitungan
- Supplies the pooled 12-month figure: roughly 1 in 20 children sleepwalk in a given year. The pooled lifetime figure (6.9%, mixed ages) is far below the Quebec cohort's 29.1% because most pooled studies used single retrospective questions rather than repeated prospective parent reports (an interpretation, not a finding of either paper), which suggests sleepwalking counts are sensitive to method. Exposure context only; no injury figure.
- Independensi
- Independent research group and methodology (pooled cross-sectional studies) from the Quebec cohort.
-
[4] Western Journal of Emergency Medicine (Sauter et al. 2016; 17(6):709-712) — Somnambulism: Emergency Department Admissions Due to Sleepwalking-Related Trauma
Somnambulism: Emergency Department Admissions Due to Sleepwalking-Related Trauma- Statistik
11 sleepwalking-related trauma presentations among about 620,000 ED admissions at Inselspital, Bern, 2000-2015; falls were the leading mechanism; 4 of 11 (36.4%) were hospitalized; no deaths; adult department treating patients aged 16 and over (two of the 11 were 16)- Kutipan
“"Of 620,000 screened ED admissions, 11 were associated with trauma and sleepwalking." ... "Although sleepwalking seems benign in the majority of cases and most of the few injured patients will not require hospitalization, major injuries are possible." [First sentence from the abstract; second from the full-text Conclusion (the abstract reads "did not require"). Both checked against the Europe PMC full text, 2026-09-27] ”
- Data sumber dari
- 2016-11-01
- Diakses
- 2026-09-26
- Perhitungan
- The only systematic count of sleepwalking injuries located. It cannot anchor a pediatric estimate: the adult department treats patients aged 16 and over, there is no denominator of sleepwalkers in the catchment, and cases were found by chart search, which misses injuries not recorded as sleepwalking-related. 11 / 620,000 is a share of ED visits (about 1 in 56,000), not a probability per sleepwalker, and is shown for scale only. This is the reason for no_reliable_estimate.
-
[5] Nemours KidsHealth — Sleepwalking (for Parents)
Sleepwalking (for Parents)- Statistik
Pediatric safety guidance for sleepwalking children: gates at bedroom door and/or stair top; locked windows and doors- Kutipan
“"Install safety gates outside your child's room and/or at the top of any stairs." ... "Lock the windows and doors in your child's bedroom and throughout your home in case your young sleepwalker wanders." [kidshealth.org was not directly reachable in-session; wording confirmed via exact-phrase search of the indexed page] ”
- Data sumber dari
- 2026-09-26
- Diakses
- 2026-09-26
- Perhitungan
- Establishes that stairs and windows are the hazards pediatric guidance singles out. Guidance, not evidence of frequency: it gives no injury rate and no data on how much gates or locks reduce injury among sleepwalkers. source_date set to access date because the page shows a rolling review date.